The following materials (written documents) were
made available to the committee in the closed
sessions:
1. Green, E.S. and J. Savitz. The Benefits of Active Remediation of Contaminated Sediment. Submitted June 1, 2006.
2. Information packets from EPA on Superfund site information, remedial activities, and monitoring data. Information on the following sites was provided: Bayou Bonfouca, LA; Commencement Bay, Nearshore Tideflats (Hylebos and Sitcum), WA; Grasse River, NY; Harbor Island (Todd Shipyard and Lockheed Shipyard), WA; Ketchikan Pulp Company, AK; Manistique Harbor, MI; Marathon Battery, NY; Newport Naval and Education Training Center, RI; Outboard Marine Corporation, IL; Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, WA; and United Heckathorn, CA.
3. Information packets from Sediment Management Work Group on Superfund site information, remedial activities, and monitoring data. Information on the following sites was provided: Bayou Bonfouca, LA; Cumberland Bay, NY; Fox River, WI; GM-Massena, NY; Grasse River, NY; Manistique Harbor, MI; Marathon Battery, NY; Outboard Marine Corporation, IL; and United Heckathorn, CA.
4. Visual aids used for the following presentations:
a.Contaminated Sediment Dredging Residuals: Recent Monitoring Data and Management Implications, Clay Patmont, Anchor Environmental
b.Summary and Analysis of Monitoring Data at Superfund Dredging Sites, Steven Nadeau, Sediment Management Work Group
c.Overview of Superfund Dredging Activities and Monitoring Data from the Grasse River, NY, John Connolly, QEA; Young Chang, U.S. EPA Region 2; Larry McShea, Alcoa
d.Overview of Superfund Dredging Activities and Monitoring Data in Little Lake Butte des Morts, WI, Rick Fox, Natural Resource Technology; Mike Jury, CH2M Hill; and John Kern, KERN Statistical Services
5. Baker, J.E., W.F. Bohlen, R. Bopp, B. Brownawell, T.K. Collier, F.J. Farley, W.R. Geyer, and R. Nairn. 2001. PCBs in the Upper Hudson River: The Science Behind the Dredging Controversy, A White Paper Prepared for the Hudson River Foundation, New York, NY. October 25, 2001 [online]. Available: http://www.seagrant.sunysb.edu/
HEP/archive/hrfpcb102901.pdf [accessed June 20, 2006].
6. Cleland, J. 2000. Results of Contaminated Sediment Cleanups Relevant to The Hudson River: An Update to Scenic Hudson’s Report Advances in Dredging Contaminated Sediment. Scenic Hudson, Poughkeepsie, NY. October 2000 [online]. Available: http://www.scenichudson.org/pcbs/pcb_dredge.pdf [accessed June 20, 2006].
7. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Realizing Remediation II: An Updated Summary of Contaminated Sediment Remediation Activities in the Great Lakes Basin. Great Lakes National Program Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. July 2000 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/sediment/
realizing2/index.html [accessed June 20, 2006].
8. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Realizing Remediation: A Summary of Contaminated Sediment Remediation Activities in the Great Lakes Basin. Great Lakes National Program Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. March 1998 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/sediment/realizing/realcover.html [accessed June 20, 2006].