Skip to main content
Standing Committee

Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal Standing Committee

The 2022 National Academies report, A Research Strategy for Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration, details the state of science of several marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) approaches along with an agenda of critical research needed to increase the knowledge base of this very complex climate mitigation approach and thus enable informed decision making on next steps. As the field is rapidly evolving, the National Academies Ocean Studies Board will establish a new standing committee to regularly update the 2022 report so that it remains relevant and serves as a trusted, vetted, and transparent resource for the mCDR community.

In progress

Any project, supported or not by a committee, that is currently being worked on or is considered active, and will have an end date.

Description

A standing committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will address the following needs of the marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) community:

  • Creation of a digital, online version of the National Academies’ 2022 report, A Research Strategy for Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal that can be revised and published with peer-reviewed updates as warranted to ensure that the 2022 report remains relevant and serves as a trusted, vetted, and transparent resource for the wide range of stakeholders comprising the mCDR community. Updates could include:

o Inclusion of an annual or semi-annual “state of the science, technology, and research” update, summarizing the landscape of the rapidly advancing field of mCDR.

o Updates of fundamental understanding and specific research and development needs of any marine CDR approach. This would include updating independent modules of the report and updating the summary tables of feasibility for the various marine CDR approaches as new information on potential, scalability, environmental impacts, cost, and other factors becomes available.

o Updates of overarching research and development needs of cross-cutting mCDR research (not approach-specific) such as legal and regulatory issues, social dimensions and environmental justice considerations, and monitoring, reporting, and verification. This could include additions such as consensus on a code of conduct for conducting mCDR research in a responsible and transparent manner or specific recommendations for monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) of atmospheric carbon dioxide removed (including data transparency), and prioritization of mCDR approaches.

o Additional information not fully covered in the original report, such as the consideration of environmental impacts on deep-sea ecosystems, assessment of new or co-located approaches, or ad hoc peer review of reports or projects completed outside the National Academies.

  • Initiation of new studies or new components to the digital mCDR report
Work with Us
Looking for independent, nonpartisan guidance from the nation’s top subject-matter experts? We stand ready to help potential sponsors across a variety of sectors shape research and policy agendas, regulation, investments, operations, state and local initiatives, and more.
Keck building

Collaborators

Committee

Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Kelly Oskvig

Staff Officer

Sponsors

Carbon to Sea Initiative

National Academy of Sciences George and Cynthia Mitchell Endowment for Sustainability Science

Staff

Kelly Oskvig

Lead

KOskvig@nas.edu

Safah Wyne

SWyne@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.