Completed
Topics
A 2017 report, Review of the Marine Recreational Information Program discusses the difficulty of collecting necessary data on recreational fisheries. In some cases, enforcement of catch limits requires short recreational fishing seasons, further complicating data collection, monitoring, and management. The Modernizing Recreational Fisheries Management Act of 2018 called for a National Academies study on how well the Marine Recreational Information Program meets the needs of in-season management of fisheries with annual catch limits (ACLs). This study will also consider how survey methods or management strategies might be modified to better meet those needs.
Featured publication
Consensus
ยท2021
Marine recreational fishing is a popular activity enjoyed by more than 9 million Americans annually and is a driver of the American ocean-or blue-economy. To ensure that fish populations are not overexploited, the NOAA Fisheries' Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) monitors recreational c...
View details
Description
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will convene an ad hoc committee that will evaluate:
(A) if and how the design of the Marine Recreational Information Program, for the purposes of stock assessment and the determination of stock management reference points, can be improved to better meet the needs of in-season
management of annual catch limits (ACLs);
(B) what actions the Secretary, Councils, and States could take to improve the accuracy and timeliness of data collection and analysis to improve or supplement the Marine Recreational Information Program and facilitate in-season management;
(C) alternative management approaches that could be applied to recreational fisheries, consistent with requirements for fisheries with ACLs, for which the Marine Recreational Information Program is not sufficient to meet the needs of in-season management
This evaluation will include the following:
(1) fishery-specific assessment of the in-season management needs for fisheries subject to an ACL in each region,
(2) an objective, independent evaluation of how well current survey methods in each region meet the needs of the defined in-season management of recreational fisheries with ACLs,
(3) an evaluation of how current ACL in-season management strategies utilize information provided by the current surveys,
(4) an assessment of how survey methods and/or management strategies could be modified to better meet the needs for
ACL monitoring and accountability measures to ensure that overfishing does not occur, and
(5) an assessment of the trade-offs that should be considered when determining appropriate pairing of survey methods with ACL management strategies, including the relative costs or resource requirements of the survey methods considered by the committee.
Contributors
Sponsors
Department of Commerce
Staff
Constance Karras
Lead
Alexandra Skrivanek
Lead
Grace Callahan