Skip to main content

The Future of Atmospheric Chemistry Research

Completed

This report summarizes the rationale and need for supporting a comprehensive U.S. research program in atmospheric chemistry; comments on the broad trends in laboratory, field, satellite, and modeling studies of atmospheric chemistry; determines the priority areas of research for advancing the basic science of atmospheric chemistry; and identifies the highest priority needs for improvements in the research infrastructure to address those priority research topics.

Description

An ad hoc committee will identify priorities and strategic steps forward for atmospheric chemistry research for the next decade, in the context of the current state of knowledge, ongoing research activities, and resource availability. The committee will report a compelling research strategy and identify where additional investments in research infrastructure could best advance scientific understanding. The report will include the following elements:

  1. A brief summary of the rationale and need for supporting a comprehensive U.S. research program in atmospheric chemistry, including how research in this area contributes to advancing our understanding of climate change, air quality, the carbon and nitrogen cycles, the energy and water cycles, and the overall role of the atmosphere in Earth system science.
  2. A commentary on the broad trends in laboratory, field, satellite, and modeling studies of atmospheric chemistry, as well as application of atmospheric chemistry knowledge that may influence the overall field of Earth Sciences in the coming decade.
  3. A determination of the priority areas of research for advancing the basic science of atmospheric chemistry over the coming decade. In prioritization, the committee should consider the need for a balance among laboratory studies, field campaigns, modeling efforts, and instrument development. The committee is requested to provide research areas/topics sorted by their prioritization, and to explain how the priorities were developed.
  4. An analysis of the research infrastructure needed to address the priority research topics identified in #3 and identification of the highest priority needs for improvements in this infrastructure. This analysis will include an assessment of the need for new measurement technologies, observational platforms, and major infrastructure investments in atmospheric chemistry over the next decade.

The committee’s report should incorporate input from the broader atmospheric chemistry research community, including scientists working in academia, government, and private sector. The committee should consider how the proposed research agenda relates to the broader federal agency and international context for atmospheric chemistry, but focus on those activities that might best be supported by the National Science Foundation. The committee should not make specific budget recommendations, but should comment generally on budget implications as part of determining priority areas for research.

Contributors

Committee

Co-Chair

Co-Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Download all bios

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Disclosure of Conflict of Interest: Dr. Christine Wiedinmyer

In accordance with Section 15 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the "Academy shall make its best efforts to ensure that no individual appointed to serve on [a] committee has a conflict of interest that is relevant to the functions to be performed, unless such conflict is promptly and publicly disclosed and the Academy determines that the conflict is unavoidable." A conflict of interest refers to an interest, ordinarily financial, of an individual that could be directly affected by the work of the committee. As specified in the Academy's policy and procedures (http://www.nationalacademies.org/coi/index.html), an objective determination is made for each provisionally appointed committee member whether or not a conflict of interest exists given the facts of the individual's financial and other interests and the task being undertaken by the committee. A determination of a conflict of interest for an individual is not an assessment of that individual's actual behavior or character or ability to act objectively despite the conflicting interest.

We have concluded that for the committee to accomplish the tasks for which it was established its membership must include among others, members who have current knowledge of the range of modes used by the National Science Foundation to support the atmospheric sciences, including small research centers, mission-oriented research programs, and Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC). NSF supports one FFRDC in the atmospheric sciences, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), which supports a significant portion of research in the discipline. Because NCAR is a large and evolving entity, committee members are needed who have an up-to-date and comprehensive understanding of its past and future directions.

To meet the need for this expertise and experience, Dr. Christine Wiedinmyer is proposed for appointment to the committee even though we have concluded that she has a conflict of interest because she is employed as a staff scientist at NCAR.

As stated in her biographical summary, Dr. Wiedinmyer brings to the committee first-hand knowledge of how NCAR is currently transforming to embrace a more interdisciplinary approach to atmospheric sciences, and she has considerable experience in evaluating ways in which climate, technology, and policy impact air quality. This unique expertise is critical to the committee’s ability to fulfill its tasks related to determining priority areas of research for advancing the basic science of atmospheric chemistry considering the need for a balance in research modes and approaches. We believe that Dr. Wiedinmyer can serve effectively as a member of the committee, taking into account the composition of the committee, the work to be performed, and the procedures to be followed in completing the work.

After an extensive search, we have been unable to find another individual with the equivalent institutional experience and technical expertise as Dr. Wiedinmyer who does not have a similar conflict of interest. Therefore, we have concluded that this conflict is unavoidable.

Sponsors

National Science Foundation

Staff

Edward Dunlea

Lead

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.