Previous Chapter: 5 The Impact of the NSF SBIR/STTR Programs: Outcomes of NSF SBIR and STTR Awardees
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.

References

Arrow, K. J. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 29(3):155-173.

Arthur, W. B. 2007. The structure of invention. Research Policy 36(2):274-287.

Audretsch, D. B., A. N. Link, and J. T. Scott. 2002. Public/private partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-supported research. Research Policy 31(1):145-158.

Auerswald, P. E., and L. M. Branscomb. 2003. Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: Financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. Journal of Technology Transfer 28(3-4):227-239.

Bernstein, S., X. Giroud, and R. Townsend. 2016. The impact of venture capital monitoring. Journal of Finance 71(4):1591-1622.

BIRAC (Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council). n.d. About us. https://birac.nic.in/desc_new.php?id=89.

Block, F. 2008. Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics and Society 36(2):169-206.

Bush, V. 1945. Science: The endless frontier. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Chen, C., S. Kahanamoku, A. Tripati, R. Alegado, V. Morris, K. Andrade, and J. Hosbey. 2022, November 29. Meta-research: Systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation. eLife. https://elifesciences.org/articles/83071.

Clayton, P. A., Feldman, M. P., and N. Lowe. 2018. Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives 32:104-124.

Cook, L., M. Marx, and E. Yimfur. 2022. Funding Black high-growth startups. Working Paper No. 30682. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

CRS (Congressional Research Service). 2021, April 9. The National Science Foundation: An overview. CRS Report R46753. Washington, DC: CRS.

Dawnbreaker, Inc. 2020. Women’s inclusion in small business innovation research & small business technology transfer programs. Prepared for the National Women’s Business Council. https://cdn.www.nwbc.gov/

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.

wp-content/uploads/2020/08/11124006/Women-In-SBIR-Report_NW BC_Final_2020-08-07.pdf.

EEOC (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). n.d. Diversity in high tech. https://www.eeoc.gov/special-report/diversity-high-tech (accessed March 15, 2023).

European Innovation Council. n.d. About the European Innovation Council. https://eic.ec.europa.eu/about-european-innovation-council_en (accessed January 20, 2023).

Ewens, M., and R. Townsend. 2020. Are early stage investors biased against women? Journal of Financial Economics 135(3):653-677. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:135:y:2020:i:3:p:653677.

Feldman, M., T. Hadjimichael, L. Lanahan, and T. Kemeny. 2016. The logic of economic development: A definition and model for investment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34(1):5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/.

Gans, J., and S. Stern. 2003. When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit? Evidence from the SBIR program. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12(4):361-384.

GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2021. Small business research programs: Agencies should further improve award timelines. GAO-22-104677. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-104677.pdf.

Guzman, J., and A. Kacperczyk. 2019. Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Research Policy 48(7):1666-1680. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:7:p:1666-1680.

Haeussler, C., and J. A. Colyvas. 2011. Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy 40(1):41-54.

Haltiwanger, J., R. S. Jarmin, and J. Miranda. 2013. Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(2):347-361.

Howell, S. T. 2017. Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review 107(4):1136-1164.

Howell, S. T. 2019. Analysis of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Fossil Energy SBIR programs. Prepared for the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/benefits-eere-small-business-innovation-grants-confirmed-new-study.

Howell, S., and J. D. Brown. 2020. Do cash windfalls affect wages? Evidence from R&D grants to small firms. New York: New York University Stern School of Business. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3474633.

Inoue, H., and E. Yamaguchi. 2017. Evaluation of the Small Business Innovation Research program in Japan. Sage Open 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017690791.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.

Joshi, A. M., T. M. Inouye, and J. A. Robinson. 2018. How does agency workforce diversity influence federal R&D funding of minority and women technology entrepreneurs? An analysis of the SBIR and STTR programs, 2001–2011. Small Business Economics 50:499-519.

Kanze, D., M. Conley, T. Okimoto, D. Phillips, and J. Merluzzi. 2020. Evidence that investors penalize female founders for lack of industry fit. Science Advances 6(4). https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abd7664.

Lanahan, L., and D. Armanios. 2018. Does more certification always benefit a venture? Organization Science 29(5):931-947.

Lanahan, L., and M. P. Feldman. 2015. Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Research Policy 44(7):1387-1402.

Lanahan, L., and M. P. Feldman. 2018. Approximating exogenous variation in R&D: Evidence from the Kentucky and North Carolina SBIR state match programs. Review of Economics and Statistics 100(4):740-752.

Lanahan, L., A. Joshi, and E. Johnson. 2021. Do public R&D subsidies produce jobs? Evidence from the SBIR/STTR program. Research Policy 50(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104286.

Lanahan, L., D. Armanios, and A. Joshi. 2022. Inappropriateness penalty, desirability premium: What do more certifications actually signal? Organization Science 33(2):854-871.

Lerner, J. 2000. The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Private Equity 3(2):55-78.

Liu, G. 2014, August 28. Incentives for doing business in Taiwan: SBIR. Taiwan News. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/2558902.

Lockett, A., and M. Wright 2005. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy 34(7):1043-1057.

Marx, M. 2022. Non-compete agreements, gender, and entrepreneurship. Organization Science 33(5):1756-1772.

Mazzucato, M. 2013. Financing innovation: Creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(4):851-867.

Mazzucato, M. 2015. The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.

Myers, K., and L. Lanahan. 2022. Estimating spillovers from publicly funded R&D: Evidence from the US Department of Energy. American Economic Review 112(7):2393-2423.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2015. SBIR at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18944.

NASEM. 2020. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25674.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.

NASEM. 2022. Assessment of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26376.

NCSES (National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics). 2021. The STEM labor force of today: Scientists, engineers, and skilled technical workers. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212/participation-of-demographic-groups-in-stem (accessed December 28, 2022).

NCSES. 2022a. Federal funds for research and development: Fiscal years 2020-21. Data Tables. NSF 22-323. April 28. Table 7. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22323.

NCSES. 2022b. InfoBrief: Businesses spent over a half trillion dollars for R&D performance in the United States during 2020, a 9.1% increase over 2019. NSF22-343, October 4. Table 1. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22343.

Nelson, R. R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67(3):297-306.

Nelson, R. R. 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York and London: Oxford University Press.

Nemet, G. F. 2009. Demand pull, technology push, and government-led incentives for nonincremental technical change. Research Policy 38(5):700-709.

Netherlands Enterprise Agency. n.d. SBIR innovation competition. Utrecht: Netherlands Enterprise Agency. https://business.gov.nl/subsidy/small-business-innovation-research.

Neumark, D., B. Wall, and J. Zhang. 2011. Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series. Review of Economics and Statistics 93(1):16-29.

NRC (National Research Council). 2008a. An assessment of the SBIR program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11989.

NRC. 2008b. An assessment of the SBIR program at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18944.

NSF (National Science Foundation). n.d.a. About America’s Seed Fund powered by NSF. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/our-program (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.b. Meet TIP—Technology, Innovation and Partnerships. https://beta.nsf.gov/tip/latest (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.c. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Solicitation topics & subtopics. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/assets/files/applicants/combined-topics.pdf (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.d. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Project pitch. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/apply/project-pitch/ (accessed December 11, 2022).

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.

NSF. n.d.e. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Merit review guidelines. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/resources/review/merit-review (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.f. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Boot camp. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/resources/awardees/phase-1/bootcamp (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.g. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Educational opportunities. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/resources/awardees/supplement/educational/ (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.h. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Supplemental funding overview. Alexandria, VA. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/resources/awardees/supplement/overview/ (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.i. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Ambassador toolkit. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/resources/awardees/phase-1/ambassador/ (accessed December 11, 2022).

NSF. n.d.j. America’s Seed Fund powered by the National Science Foundation: Events. Alexandria, VA. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/events (accessed December 12, 2022).

NSF. n.d.k. The history of NSF SBIR. https://seedfund.nsf.gov/press (accessed January 30, 2023).

NSF. n.d.l. Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR). https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/epscor (accessed January 30, 2023).

NSF. 2013. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR): Phase I Solicitation FY-2014: NSF 13-546; Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR): Phase I Solicitation FY-2014: NSF 13-547. NSF webinar presentation by Jesus Soriano, May 29, 2022. https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/sbdc/_pdf/Soriano.Jesus.TechGrants.2013.5.29.pdf.

NSF. 2020, March 25. Dear colleague letter: Request for SBIR/STTR Phase I proposals addressing COVID-19. NSF 20-065. Alexandria, VA: NSF.

NSF. 2022a, November 15. FY 2022 agency financial report. NSF 23-002. Alexandria, VA: NSF.

NSF. 2022b. Leading the world in discovery and innovation, STEM talent development and the delivery of benefits from research—NSF strategic plan for fiscal years (FY) 2022-2026. https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/strategic_plan.

Raffo, J. 2020. MATCHIT: Stata module to match two datasets based on similar text patterns. EconPapers. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s457992.

Samila, S., and O. Sørensen. 2020, January 9. Venture capital as a catalyst to commercialization SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1533787.

SBA (Small Business Administration). n.d. About SBIR. https://www.sbir.gov/about (accessed December 19, 2022).

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.

SBA. 1982. The state of small business: A report of the President transmitted to the Congress. Washington, DC: SBA.

SBA. 2020. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program: Policy directive. https://www.sbir.gov/sites/default/files/SBA_SBIR_STTR_POLICY_DIRECTIVE_OCT_2020_v2.pdf.

Sherwin, C. W., and R. S. Isenson. 1967. Project hindsight. Science 156(3782):1571-1577.

Siegel, D. S., and C. Wessner. 2012. Universities and the success of entrepreneurial ventures: Evidence from the small business innovation research program. Journal of Technology Transfer 37(4):404-415.

Siegel, D. S., D. Waldman, and A. Link. 2003. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy 32(1):27-48.

Sørensen, J. B., and T. E. Stuart. 2000. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(1):81-112.

Sørensen, O., and T. Stuart. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology 106(6):1546-1586.

Tibbetts, R. 2011. Reauthorizing SBIR: The critical importance of SBIR and small high-tech firms in stimulating and strengthening the U.S. economy. Appendix M of U.S. Congress, House Committee on Small Business, Hearing on Spurring Innovation and Job Creation: The SBIR Program. March 16. 112th Cong. 1st session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Toole, A. A., and D. Czarnitzki. 2007. Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63(4):716-738.

Toole, A. A., and D. Czarnitzki. 2010. Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? Management Science 56(9):1599-1614.

U.K. Government. 2020. SBRI: The Small Business Research Initiative. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/sbri-the-small-businessresearch-initiative.

Wallsten, S. J. 2000. The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. RAND Journal of Economics 31(1):82-100.

Wang, Y. B., J. Z. Li, and J. L. Furman. 2017. Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s Innofund program. Research Policy 46(6):1142-1161.

Younkin, P., and V. Kuppuswamy. 2017. The colorblind crowd? Founder Race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Science 64(7):3269-3287. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2774.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.
Page 107
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.
Page 108
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.
Page 109
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.
Page 110
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.
Page 111
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Review of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26884.
Page 112
Next Chapter: APPENDIXES
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.