Skip to main content

State-of-the-Science and the Future of Cumulative Impact Assessment

In progress

Any project, supported or not by a committee, that is currently being worked on or is considered active, and will have an end date.

On November 14, 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency informed the National Academy of Sciences that it should terminate all work on this activity. This activity has ended, and the pre-publication version of the report now available will serve as the final product.

Description

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (National Academies) propose to assist the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by assembling an ad hoc committee that will convene state-of-the-science workshops and develop a consensus report to advise on how EPA might further develop the scientific foundation underlying the practice of cumulative impact assessment.
The charge questions to the committee are as follows:

  • How can elements of prior risk assessment advice from the National Academies, developments by EPA and others, and response from communities inform a holistic and inclusive approach to developing and implementing cumulative impact assessment?
  • What types of stressors, both now and anticipated in the future, should be prioritized, characterized, and considered in combination in a cumulative impact assessment to best reflect overall burdens facing diverse communities and populations?
  • How can cumulative impact assessment consider factors that may make a community more vulnerable to stressors, barriers to strengthening a community’s ability to respond to stressors, and critical paths to improved community health and well-being in the future?
  • How can community and tribal data and knowledge be incorporated into cumulative impact assessment?
  • What approaches for assessing overall health and well-being are most useful for incorporating into cumulative impact assessment?
  • How can uncertainty in cumulative impact assessments be characterized?
  • How can cumulative impact assessment be adapted to different communities, generalized to regional or national scale, and remain flexible for EPA's different programmatic needs?

Collaborators

Committee

Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Staff Officer

Sponsors

EPA

Staff

Kate Guyton

Lead

Austin Scheetz

Anthony DePinto

John Ben Soileau

Elizabeth Boyle

Thomasina Lyles

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.