A REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING-
RELATED PROGRAMS AT THE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS
AND TECHNOLOGY
FISCAL YEAR 2012
Panel on Review of the Manufacturing-Related Programs at the
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Laboratory Assessments Board
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the panel responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
This study was supported by Sponsor Award # 1195 (under SB134106Z0011) between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project.
Copies of this report are available from
Laboratory Assessments Board
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
National Research Council
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Copyright 2012 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.
PANEL ON REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING-RELATED PROGRAMS
AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
KANTI JAIN, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Chair
HADI A. AKEEL, Amteng Corporation
JULIE CHEN, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
DIANNE CHONG, The Boeing Company
RANDALL R. GORHAM, JR., Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
JEFF GUST, Fluke Calibration
LAWRENCE L. KAZMERSKI, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
JOHN W. KOZARICH, ActivX Biosciences, Incorporated
DOUGLAS LOY, Deloy, LLC
ROBERT E. SCHAFRIK, General Electric Aircraft Engines
LYLE H. SCHWARTZ, Air Force Office of Scientific Research (retired)
F. STAN SETTLES, University of Southern California
MICHAEL G. SPENCER, Cornell University
MATTHEW J. ZALUZEC, Ford Motor Company
Staff
JAMES P. McGEE, Director
CY BUTNER, Senior Program Officer
LIZA HAMILTON, Administrative Coordinator
EVA LABRE, Program Associate
Acknowledgment of Reviewers
This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
John E. Allison, University of Michigan,
Julia Phillips, Sandia National Laboratories,
Kathleen Taylor, General Motors Corporation (retired), and
James C. Wyant, University of Arizona.
Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Neil A. Duffie of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring panel and the institution.
This page intentionally left blank.
Contents
1 THE CHARGE TO THE PANEL AND THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Technical Merit and Scientific Caliber
NIST Engagement with Outside Stakeholders
Program Coordination and Cohesion
Description and Discussion of Programs
Technical Merit and Scientific Caliber
NIST Engagement with Outside Stakeholders
Program Coordination and Cohesion
4 NEXT-GENERATION MATERIALS MEASUREMENTS, MODELING, AND SIMULATION
Technical Merit and Scientific Caliber
NIST Engagement with Outside Stakeholders
This page intentionally left blank.
