Peer Review of Interim Report on Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Predicting Wellhead Oil-Burning Efficiency at Bench and Intermediate Scales (2021)

Chapter: Appendix C: Peer Review Schedule and Committee Meeting Summaries

Visit NAP.edu/10766 to get more information about this book, to buy it in print, or to download it as a free PDF.
Previous Chapter: Appendix B: Anonymized Committee Responses to Charge Questions
Page 35 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Peer Review Schedule and Committee Meeting Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Peer Review of Interim Report on Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Predicting Wellhead Oil-Burning Efficiency at Bench and Intermediate Scales. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26211.
Save
Cancel

Appendix C

Peer Review Schedule and Committee Meeting Summaries

Project Schedule and Timeline
Month Activities and Milestones
November 2020
  • Contract awarded and project start
December 2020
  • Sponsor orientation and launch meeting
  • Draft peer review charge document
  • Dissemination of Call for Nominations
January-February 2021
  • Committee selection process
  • Government Orientation Meeting
  • Documentation of the Peer Review Selection Process
March 2021
  • Review of proposal begins o Prepare the Peer Review Materials o Manage the Peer Review Process
  • Provide draft charge document to committee
  • Peer Review Meeting 1
April 2021
  • Collect and compile committee comments on review questions
  • Peer Review Meeting 2
  • Peer Review Meeting 3
May-July 2021
  • Peer Review Meeting 4
  • Revise and finalize consensus findings and conclusions
  • Complete report draft
  • Complete National Academies Report Review Committee process
  • Finalize report, deliver to BSEE, public release
August 2021
  • Publish NAS Consensus Report
  • Government Follow-up Meeting
September-November 2021
  • Dissemination activities
  • Close out of the contract

Committee Meeting Summaries

Peer Review Meeting 1
March 26, 2021

Closed meeting of the committee to conduct the bias and conflict of interest discussion. Academies’ staff led a discussion with the committee to address potential biases and conflicts of interests and to allow the committee opportunity to determine if it is appropriately constituted to address their Statement of Task.

Page 36 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Peer Review Schedule and Committee Meeting Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Peer Review of Interim Report on Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Predicting Wellhead Oil-Burning Efficiency at Bench and Intermediate Scales. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26211.
Save
Cancel

Peer Review Meeting 2
April 6, 2021

The committee first met in closed session to discuss their Statement of Task, the charge questions provided to the committee by the project sponsor, and the project schedule. The committee then entered an open session to meet with the project sponsors and the authors of the interim report to ask relevant questions to provide clarity on their task.

Peer Review Meeting 3
April 21, 2021

The committee heard from the authors of the interim report to ask additional questions in open session. The meeting was also open to pre-registered members of the public for comments.

Peer Review Meeting 4
May 12-13, 2021

During a two-day closed session meeting, the committee finalized their conclusions and recommendations, came to consensus on their responses to the provided charge questions, and finalized drafting the report.

Page 35 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Peer Review Schedule and Committee Meeting Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Peer Review of Interim Report on Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Predicting Wellhead Oil-Burning Efficiency at Bench and Intermediate Scales. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26211.
Save
Cancel
Page 35
Page 36 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Peer Review Schedule and Committee Meeting Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Peer Review of Interim Report on Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Predicting Wellhead Oil-Burning Efficiency at Bench and Intermediate Scales. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26211.
Save
Cancel
Page 36
Next Chapter: Appendix D: Additional Resources
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.