Completed
The report examines the scientific, technical, environmental, human health and safety, and regulatory aspects of uranium mining, milling, and processing as they relate to the Commonwealth of Virginia. The study was conducted to assist the Commonwealth in determining whether uranium mining, milling, and processing can be undertaken in a manner that safeguards the environment, natural and historic resources, agricultural lands, and the health and well-being of its citizens.
Featured publication
Consensus
·2012
Uranium mining in the Commonwealth of Virginia has been prohibited since 1982 by a state moratorium, although approval for restricted uranium exploration in the state was granted in 2007. Uranium Mining in Virginia examines the scientific, technical, environmental, human health and safety, and regul...
View details
Description
Uranium mining in the Commonwealth of Virginia has been prohibited since 1982 by a state moratorium, although approval for restricted uranium exploration in the state was granted in 2007. A National Research Council study will examine the scientific, technical, environmental, human health and safety, and regulatory aspects of uranium mining, milling, and processing as they relate to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of assisting the Commonwealth to determine whether uranium mining, milling, and processing can be undertaken in a manner that safeguards the environment, natural and historic resources, agricultural lands, and the health and well-being of its citizens. In particular, the study will:
1) Assess the potential short- and long-term occupational and public health and safety considerations from uranium mining, milling, processing, and reclamation, including the potential human health risks from exposure to “daughter” products of radioactive decay of uranium.
2) Review global and national uranium market trends.
3) Identify and briefly describe the main types of uranium deposits worldwide including, for example, geologic characteristics, mining operations, and best practices.
4) Analyze the impact of uranium mining, milling, processing, and reclamation operations on public health, safety, and the environment at sites with comparable geologic, hydrologic, climatic, and population characteristics to those found in the Commonwealth. Such analysis shall describe any available mitigating measures to reduce or eliminate the negative impacts from uranium operations.
5) Review the geologic, environmental, geographic, climatic, and cultural settings and exploration status of uranium resources in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
6) Review the primary technical options and best practices approaches for uranium mining, milling, processing, and reclamation that might be applicable within the Commonwealth of Virginia, including discussion of improvements made since 1980 in the design, construction, and monitoring of tailings impoundments (“cells”).
7) Review the state and federal regulatory framework for uranium mining, milling, processing, and reclamation.
8) Review federal requirements for secure handling of uranium materials, including personnel, transportation, site security, and material control and accountability.
9) Identify the issues that may need to be considered regarding the quality and quantity of groundwater and surface water, and the quality of soil and air from uranium mining, milling, processing, and reclamation. As relevant, water and waste management and severe weather effects or other stochastic events may also be considered.
10) Assess the potential ecosystem issues for uranium mining, milling, processing, and reclamation.
11) Identify baseline data and approaches necessary to monitor environmental and human impacts associated with uranium mining, milling, processing, and reclamation.
12) Prepare a non-technical public dissemination document of the committee’s report.
By addressing these questions, the study will provide independent, expert advice that can be used to inform decisions about the future of uranium mining in the Commonwealth of Virginia; however, the study will not make recommendations about whether or not uranium mining should be permitted nor will the study include site-specific assessments.
Contributors
Committee
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest: Henry Schnell
In accordance with Section 15 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the "Academy shall make its best efforts to ensure that no individual appointed to serve on [a] committee has a conflict of interest that is relevant to the functions to be performed, unless such conflict is promptly and publicly disclosed and the Academy determines that the conflict is unavoidable." A conflict of interest refers to an interest, ordinarily financial, of an individual that could be directly affected by the work of the committee. As specified in the Academy's policy and procedures (http://www.nationalacademies.org/coi/index.html), an objective determination is made for each provisionally appointed committee member whether or not a conflict of interest exists given the facts of the individual's financial and other interests and the task being undertaken by the committee. A determination of a conflict of interest for an individual is not an assessment of that individual's actual behavior or character or ability to act objectively despite the conflicting interest.
We have concluded that for this committee to accomplish the tasks for which it was established its membership must include among others, at least one person who has practical experience with and expertise in uranium mining and processing methods.
To meet the need for this expertise and experience, Mr. Henry Schnell is proposed for appointment to the committee even though we have concluded that he has a conflict of interest because he works for AREVA NC Inc, a company with worldwide business interests that include uranium exploration, mining, processing, and mine reclamation.
As his biographical summary makes clear, Mr. Schnell has over 40 years of experience in research and development in mining and ore treatment methods, including 21 years specializing in uranium mining, operations, and processing. This experience and expertise is critical to the ability of the committee to fulfill its task. In addition, AREVA Inc. no longer mines uranium in the United States. We believe that Mr. Schnell can serve effectively as a member of the committee and that the committee can produce an objective report, taking into account the composition of the committee, the work to be performed, and the procedures to be followed in completing the work.
After an extensive search, we have been unable to find another individual with the equivalent experience and technical expertise as Mr. Schnell who does not have a similar conflict of interest. Therefore, we have concluded that this potential conflict is unavoidable.
Committee Membership Roster Comments
Note (08-30-2010): The bio-sketches of the following committee members have been updated: Corby Anderson, Scott Brooks, and Jeffrey Wong.
Note (01-24-2011): New members, Paul D. Blanc and Keith N. Eshleman, added.
Note (08-17-2011): Due to other unanticipated committments, Dr. J. Ruiz resigned from the committee as he was unable to participate in committee activities.
Sponsors
Private: For Profit
State or Local
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Virginia Uranium, Inc.
Staff
David Feary
Lead
Courtney DeVane
Nicholas Rogers