References

AEA (American Evaluation Association). 2011. Public statement on cultural competence in evaluation. Fairhaven, MA: AEA. ———, n.d. What is evaluation? https://www.eval.org/About/What-is-Evaluation.

Albright, K., P. Shah, M. Santodomingo, and J. Scandlyn. 2020. Dissemination of information about climate change by state and local public health departments: United States, 2019–2020. American Journal of Public Health 110(8):1184–1190. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.305723.

Aleta, A., and Y. Moreno. 2019. Multilayer networks in a nutshell. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10(1):45–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013259.

Allan, R. P., P. A. Arias, S. Berger, J. G. Canadell, C. Cassou, D. Chen, A. Cherchi, S. L. Connors, E. Coppola, and F. A. Cruz. 2023. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Almasy, T., and D. Thompson. 2013. Media relations strategy, tracking and evaluation essentials for nonprofit organizations. Atlanta: Healthcare Georgia Foundation. https://search.issuelab.org/resources/28572/28572.pdf.

AMEC (International Association for the Measurement and Evaluation of Communication). 2024. Integrated evaluation framework. https://amecorg.com/amecframework.

Anstead, N. 2021. Social media in politics. In The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society, edited by R. Mansell. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Aral, S. 2016. The future of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 121(6):1931–1939. https://doi.org/10.1086/686293.

Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4):216–224.

Avery, C. W., A. R. Crimmins, S. Basile, and A. Lustig. 2023. Appendix 1: Assessment development process. In Fifth national climate assessment, edited by A. R. Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, and T. K. Maycock. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.

Avery, C. W., D. R. Reidmiller, T. S. Carter, K. L. M. Lewis, and K. Reeves. 2018. Report development process. In Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth national climate assessment, Volume II, edited by D. R. Reidmiller, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, K. L. M. Lewis, T. K. Maycock, and B. C. Stewart. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.

Balbach, E. D. 1999. Using case studies to do program evaluation. Sacramento: California Department of Health Services.

Bamzai-Dodson, A., A. E. Cravens, A. Wade, and R. A. McPherson. 2021. Engaging with stakeholders to produce actionable science: A framework and guidance. Weather, Climate, and Society 13(4):1027–1041. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-21-0046.1.

Bazzaz Abkenar, S., M. Haghi Kashani, E. Mahdipour, and S. M. Jameii. 2021. Big data analytics meets social media: A systematic review of techniques, open issues, and future directions. Telematics and Informatics 57:e101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101517.

Behl, M., S. Carley, R. Connolly, and F. Niepold. 2015. Teaching about the ocean and coasts with the National Climate Assessment. Current: The Journal of Marine Education 29(4):18.

Bener, A. B., B. Çağlayan, A. D. Henry, and P. Prałat. 2016. Empirical models of social learning in a large, evolving network. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0160307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160307.

Besley, J. C., and A. Dudo. 2022. Strategic science communication: A guide to setting the right objectives for more effective public engagement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bianconi, G. 2023. Multilayer networks: Structure and function. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bidwell, D., T. Dietz, and D. Scavia. 2013. Fostering knowledge networks for climate adaptation. Nature Climate Change 3:610–611.

Björneborn, L., and P. Ingwersen. 2004. Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(14):1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077.

Blamey, A., and M. Mackenzie. 2007. Theories of change and realistic evaluation. Evaluation 13(4):439–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007082129.

Bloom, A. 2021, December 9. With great care, climate change is in the classroom. The Nature Conservancy. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/who-we-are/how-we-work/youth-engagement/climate-change-education-us.

Blunden, J., T. Boyer, and E. Bartow-Gillies. 2023. State of the climate in 2022. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 104(9):S1–S516. https://doi.org/10.1175/2023bamsstateoftheclimate.1.

Borgatti, S. P. 2024. Analyzing social networks. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Boyack, K. W., and R. Klavans. 2010. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(12):2389–2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419.

Brass, D. J. 2022. New developments in social network analysis. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 9(1):225–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090628.

Braunschweiger, D. 2022. Cross-scale collaboration for adaptation to climate change: A two-mode network analysis of bridging actors in Switzerland. Regional Environmental Change 22(110). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01958-4.

Brimicombe, C. 2022. Is there a climate change reporting bias? A case study of English-language news articles, 2017–2022. Geoscience Communication 5(3):281–287. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-281-2022.

Brin, S., and L. Page. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1):107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X.

Buizer, J. L., P. Fleming, S. L. Hays, K. Dow, C. B. Field, D. Gustafson, A. Luers, and R. H. Moss. 2013. Report on preparing the nation for change: Building a sustained National Climate Assessment process. National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee. https://downloads.globalchange.gov/nca/NCADAC/NCADAC_Sustained_Assessment_Special_Report_Sept2013.pdf.

Burt, R. S., and N. Celotto. 1992. The network structure of management roles in a large matrix firm. Evaluation and Program Planning 15(3):303–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(92)90095-C.

Bykov, I. 2021. On special issue: The Politization of Social Problems in Mass Media. Journal of Political Research 5(4):3–6. https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2021-5-4-3-6.

Campbell, E., S. Patzer, L. Beall, A. Gallagher, and E. Maibach. 2020. Using social science in National Park Service climate communications: A case study in the National Capital Region. Parks Stewardship Forum 36(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/p536146377.

Carrington, P. J., J. Scott, and S. Wasserman (Eds.). 2005. Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchell. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14):8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100.

Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 1999. Framework for program evaluation in public health. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4811.pdf.

———. 2011. Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide. https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/guide/CDCEvalManual.pdf.

———. 2018. Program evaluation framework checklist for step 2. https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/steps/step2/index.htm.

———.2022. Preferred terms for select population groups & communities. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/Preferred_Terms.html.

———. 2023a. Program evaluation. https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/index.htm.

———. 2023b. A Framework for Program Evaluation. https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/framework/index.htm.

CDC, n.d. Practical use of program evaluation among sexually transmitted disease (STD) programs. https://www.cdc.gov/std/program/pupestd.htm

Chen, H.-T. 2005. Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chen, W., C. Castillo, and L. V. S. Lakshmanan. 2022. Information and influence propagation in social networks. Cham: Springer International.

Cho, R. 2023. Climate education in the U.S.: Where it stands, and why it matters. State of the Planet: News from the Columbia Climate School. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2023/02/09/climate-education-in-the-u-s-where-it-stands-and-why-it-matters/.

Chouinard, J. A. 2013. The case for participatory evaluation in an era of accountability. American Journal of Evaluation 34(2):237–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013478142.

Clarke, B., F. Otto, R. Stuart-Smith, and L. Harrington. 2022. Extreme weather impacts of climate change: An attribution perspective. Environmental Research: Climate 1(1):e012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac6e7d.

Cloyd, E., S. C. Moser, E. Maibach, J. Maldonado, and T. Chen. 2016. Engagement in the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment: Commitment, capacity, and communication for impact. Climatic Change 135(1):39–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1568-y.

College Board. 2021. AP Environmental Science overview. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap-environmental-science-course-overview.pdf.

Colorado Trust. 2002. Guidelines and best practices for culturally competent evaluations. https://www.coloradotrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/GuidelinesBestPracticesCulturally04.pdf.

Corbera, E., L. Calvet-Mir, H. Hughes and M. Paterson. 2016. Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. Nature Climate Change 6(1):94–99.

Cousins, J. B., and E. Whitmore. 1998. Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 1998(80):5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1114.

Crano, W. D., M. B. Brewer, and A. Lac. 2014. Principles and methods of social research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768311.

Cummings, C. L. 2017. Science communication. In The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods, edited by M. Allen. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cunningham, R., C. Cvitanovic, T. Measham, B. Jacobs, A.-M. Dowd, and B. Harman. 2016. Engaging communities in climate adaptation: The potential of social networks. Climate Policy 16(7):894–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1052955.

Cvitanovic, C., R. Cunningham, A. M. Dowd, S. M. Howden, and E. I. Van Putten. 2017. Using social network analysis to monitor and assess the effectiveness of knowledge brokers at connecting scientists and decision-makers: An Australian case study. Environmental Policy and Governance 27(3):256–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1752.

Dantzker, H., M. Shah, R. Gupta, C. Merse, J, Yoo, and K. Ward. 2016. Evaluation of the Third NCA Production and Dissemination Processes and Products: Briefing to the Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment. Presented at Bethesda, MD.

Declet-Barreto, J. 2024. Union of Concerned Scientists’ perspective on the National Climate Assessment. Presentation at the 5th National Climate Assessment Information Gathering Session on February 28, 2024, Washington, DC.

Ding, Y., G. Zhang, T. Chambers, M. Song, X. Wang, and C. Zhai. 2014. Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(9):1820–1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23256.

Djenontin, I. N. S., and A. M. Meadow. 2018. The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: Lessons from international practice. Environmental Management 61(6):885–903.

Dolšak, N., and A. Prakash. 2022. Three faces of climate justice. Annual Review of Political Science 25(1):283–301. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-125514.

Dubois, B., and M. E. Krasny. 2016. Educating with resilience in mind: Addressing climate change in post-Sandy New York City. Journal of Environmental Education 47(4):255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1167004.

Dudek, J., D. G. Pina, and R. Costas. 2021. Co-link analysis as a monitoring tool: A webometric use case to map the web relationships of research projects. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, pp. 339–344. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.04251.

EOP (Executive Office of the President. 2021. Executive Order 14008 of January 27, 2021. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/01/2021-02177/tackling-the-climate-crisis-at-home-and-abroad.

———. 2023. A federal framework and action plan for climate services. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ftac_report_03222023_508.pdf

Errett, N. A., K. Dolan, C. Hartwell, J. Vickery, and J. J. Hess. 2022. Adapting by their bootstraps: State and territorial public health agencies struggle to meet the mounting challenge of climate change. American Journal of Public Health 112(10):1379–1381. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2022.307038.

EvalCommunity. 2024. Evaluation glossary. https://www.evalcommunity.com/evaluation-glossary/.

———, n.d. Types of evaluation: Theory, case studies and job interview preparation. https://www.evalcommunity.com/career-center/types-of-evaluation/.

Feiock, R. C., I. W. Lee, and H. J. Park. 2012. Administrators’ and elected officials’ collaboration networks: Selecting partners to reduce risk in economic development. Public Administration Review 72(Suppl.):S58–S68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02659.x.

Fisher, D. R. 2012. Youth political participation: Bridging activism and electoral politics. Annual Review of Sociology 38(1):119–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145439.

Fitzgerald, H. E. 2018. Community. In The SAGE encyclopedia of lifespan human development, edited by M. Bornstein and M. H. Bornstein. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Frank, K. A., and R. Xu. 2020. Causal inference for social network analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190251765.013.21.

Frank, K. A., T. Chen, E. Brown, A. Larsen, and W. B. J. Baule. 2023. A network intervention for natural resource management in the context of climate change. Social Networks 75:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.03.003.

Frumkin, H., J. Hess, G. Luber, J. Malilay, and M. McGeehin. 2008. Climate change: The public health response. American Journal of Public Health 98(3):435–445. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2007.119362.

GAO (General Accounting Office). 1987. Case study evaluations. https://www.gao.gov/products/132683.

GAO (Government Accountability Office) 2018. Climate change: Analysis of reported federal funding. https://www.gao.gov/assets/d18223.pdf.

Goodrich, K. A., K. D. Sjostrom, C. Vaughan, L. Nichols, A. Bednarek, and M. C. Lemos. 2020. Who are boundary spanners and how can we support them in making knowledge more actionable in sustainability fields? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.001.

Gorman, B. 2011. The death and life of American journalism: The media revolution that will begin the world again. Canadian Journal of Communication 35(4):634–636. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2010v35n4a2414.

Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6):1360–1380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392.

Greene, J. C. 1988. Communication of results and utilization in participatory program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 11(4):341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(88)90047-X.

GSA and OMB (U.S. General Services Administration and Office of Management and Budget). n.d. About the PRA. https://pra.digital.gov/about.

Hall, J. A., M. Blair, J. L. Buizer, D. I. Gustafson, B. Holland, S. C. Moser, and A. M. Waple. 2014. Sustained assessment: A new vision for future U.S. assessments. In Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third national Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp. 719–726. http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/response-strategies/sustained-assessment.

Henry, A. D. 2016. Network segregation and policy learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.23.

———. 2020. Meeting the challenge of learning for sustainability through policy networks. Human Ecology Review 26(2): 171–193.

———. 2023. Evaluating collaborative institutions by segregation and homophily in policy networks. Public Administration 101(2):604–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12800.

Henry, A. D., and B. Vollan. 2014. Networks and the challenge of sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39:583–610. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101813-013246.

Henry, A. D., K. Ingold, D. Nohrstedt, and C. M. Weible. 2014. Policy change in comparative contexts: Applying the advocacy coalition framework outside of western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16(4):299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.941200.

Henry, A. D., T. Dietz, and R. L. Sweeney. 2021. Coevolution of networks and beliefs in U.S. environmental risk policy. Policy Studies Journal 49(3):675–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12407.

Hoffman, M., M. Lubell, and V. Hillis. 2014. Linking knowledge and action through mental models of sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(36):13016–13021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400435111.

Hunter, L. Y. 2023. Social media, disinformation, and democracy: How different types of social media usage affect democracy cross-nationally. Democratization 30(6):1040–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2208355.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2021. Climate change 2021—the physical science basis. Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/415F29233B8BD19FB55F65E3DC67272B.

———. 2023. Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by H. Lee and J. Romero. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 35–115. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

Jacobs, K., S. Moser, and J. Buizer. 2016. The U.S. National Climate Assessment. Cham: Springer Climate. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5.

Jagannathan, K., J. C. Arnott, C. Wyborn, N. Klenk, K. J. Mach, R. H. Moss, and K. D. Sjostrom. 2020. Great expectations? Reconciling the aspiration, outcome, and possibility of co-production. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.010.

Jones, N. A., H. Ross, T. Lynam, P. Perez, and A. Leitch. 2011. Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society 16(1):46.

Joseph, H. A., E. Mallen, M. McLaughlin, E. Grossman, T. J. Holmes, A. Locklear, E. Powell, L. Thie, C. K. Uejio, K. Vacca, C. Williams, T. Bishop, C. Jeffers, H. Siegel, and C. Austin. 2023. Evaluating public health strategies for climate adaptation: Challenges and opportunities from the Climate-Ready States and Cities Initiative. PLoS Climate 2(3):e0000102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000102.

Julian, D. A. 1997. The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device. Evaluation and Program Planning 20(3):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00002-5.

Junge, K., J. Cullen, and G. Iacopini. 2020. Using contribution analysis to evaluate large-scale, transformation change processes. Evaluation 26(2):227–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020912270.

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kalafatis, S. E., M. C. Lemos, Y.-J. Lo, and K. A. Frank. 2015. Increasing information usability for climate adaptation: The role of knowledge networks and communities of practice. Global Environmental Change 32:30–39.

Kallemeyn, L. M. 2009. Methodological changes and respecting stakeholder dignity. American Journal of Evaluation 30(4):575–580.

Kane, R., C. Levine, C. Orians and C. Reinelt. 2021. Contribution analysis: A promising method for assessing advocacy’s impact. New Directions for Evaluation 2021:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20471.

Karl, T. R., J. M. P. Melillo, C. Thomas, and S. J. Hassol. 2009. Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Keith, R. E., J. C. Crosson, A. S. O’Malley, D. Cromp, and E. F. Taylor. 2017. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: A rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implementation Science 12(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7.

Kim, M., and R. M. Fernandez. 2023. What makes weak ties strong? Annual Review of Sociology 49(1):177–193. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030921-034152.

King, D., M. Griffin, and E. Bell. 2023. Inclusion and exclusion in management education and learning: A deliberative approach to conferences. Academy of Management Learning & Education 22(1):40–62. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0089.

Kirchhoff, C. J., R. Esselman, and D. Brown. 2015. Boundary organizations to boundary chains: Prospects for advancing climate science application. Climate Risk Management 9:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2015.04.001.

Kirk, K. B., A. U. Gold, T. S. Ledley, S. B. Sullivan, C. A. Manduca, D. W. Mogk, and K. Wiese. 2014. Undergraduate climate education: Motivations, strategies, successes, and support. Journal of Geoscience Education 62(4):538–549.

Kivelä, M., A. Arenas, M. Barthelemy, J. P. Gleeson, Y. Moreno, and M. A. Porter. 2014. Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks 2(3):203–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnu016.

Klaiman, T., A. Pantazis, A. Chainani, and B. Bekemeier. 2016. Using a positive deviance framework to identify local health departments in communities with exceptional maternal and child health outcomes: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 16:602. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3259-7.

Kong, X., Y. Shi, S. Yu, J. Liu, and F. Xia. 2019. Academic social networks: Modeling, analysis, mining and applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 132:86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.01.029.

Kreslake, J. M., M. Sarfaty, C. Roser-Renouf, A. A. Leiserowitz, and E. W. Maibach. 2018. The critical roles of health professionals in climate change prevention and preparedness. American Journal of Public Health 108(S2):S68–S69. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.304044.

LaFrance, J., R. Nichols, and K. E. Kirkhart. 2012. Culture writes the script: On the centrality of context in indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 2012(135):59–74.

Lam, S., and K. Skinner. 2021. The use of evaluability assessments in improving future evaluations: A scoping review of 10 years of literature (2008–2018). American Journal of Evaluation 42(4):523–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020936769.

Lance, P., and A. Hattori. 2016. Sampling and evaluation: A guide to sampling for program impact evaluation. Chapel Hill: MEASURE Evaluation, University of North Carolina.

Lee, I.-W., R. C. Feiock, and Y. Lee. 2012. Competitors and cooperators: A micro-level analysis of regional economic development collaboration networks. Public Administration Review 72(2):253–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02501.x.

Leiserowitz, A., E. Maibach, S. Rosenthal, J. Kotcher, E. Goddard, J. Carman, M. Verner, M. Ballew, J. Marlon, S. Lee, T. Myers, M. Golding, N. Badullovich, and K. Thier. 2023. Global warming’s six Americas, Fall 2023. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/global-warmings-six-americas-fall-2023/.

Lemos, M. C., C. J. Kirchhoff, S. E. Kalafatis, D. Scavia, and R. B. Rood. 2014. Moving climate information off the shelf: boundary chains and the role of RISAs as adaptive organizations. Weather, Climate, and Society 6(2):273–285. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-13-00044.1.

Lewin, K. 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2(4):34–46.

Lopez Hernandez, A., J. L. Weinberg, A. El-Harakeh, L. Adeyemi, N. Potharaj, N. Oomman, and A. Kalbarczyk. 2022. Connectedness is critical: A social network analysis to support emerging women leaders in global health. Annals of Global Health 88(1):64. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3811.

Marino, E. K., K. Maxwell, E. Eisenhauer, A. Zycherman, C. Callison, E. Fussell, M. D. Hendricks, F. H. Jacobs, A. Jerolleman, A. K. Jorgenson, E. M. Markowitz, S. T. S. Marquart-Pyatt, Melissa, R. L. Shwom, and K. Whyte. 2023. Social systems and justice. In Fifth National Climate Assessment, edited by A. R. Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, and T. K. Maycock. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.

Marinucci, G., G. Luber, C. Uejio, S. Saha, and J. Hess. 2014. Building resilience against climate effects: A novel framework to facilitate climate readiness in public health agencies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11(6):6433–6458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110606433.

Masuda, Y. J., Y. Liu, S. M. W. Reddy, K. A. Frank, K. Burford, J. R. B. Fisher, and J. Montambault. 2018. Innovation diffusion within large environmental NGOs through informal network agents. Nature Sustainability 1(4):190–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0045-9.

Mayne, J. 2008. Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect. ILAC Brief 16:e52525. Institutional Learning and Change Initiative, Biodiversity International.

Mayne, J. 2011. Contribution analysis: Addressing cause and effect. In Evaluating the Complex, K. Forss, M. Marra and R. Schwartz (Eds.), pp. 53–96. Transaction.

Mayne, J. 2012. Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation 18(3):270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012451663.

McCaston, M. K. 2005. Tips for collecting, reviewing, and analyzing secondary data. NY Health Foundation. https://nyhealthfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Tips_for_Collecting_Reviewing_and_Analyz.pdf.

McLevey, J., J. Scott, and P. J. Carrington. 2023. The Sage handbook of social network analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.

McNamara, K. 2008. Key concepts in urban geography, edited by A. Latham, D. McCormack, K. McNamara, and D. McNeill. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Melillo, J. M., G. W. Yohe, and T. Richmond. 2014. Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1412/ML14129A233.pdf.

Meyer, R. 2011. The public values failures of climate science in the US. Minerva 49(1):47-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-011-9164-4.

Mitchell, R. 2018. Web scraping with Python: Collecting more data from the modern web. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

MECCE (Monitoring and Evaluating Climate Communication and Education Project). 2022. Mapping the landscape of K–12 climate change education policy in the United States. https://dg56ycbvljkqr.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/eepro-post-files/K-12%20Change.Full%20Report.pdf.

Monroe, M. C., R. R. Plate, A. Oxarart, A. Bowers, and W. A. Chaves. 2019. Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research 25(6):791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.

Montague, S. 2012. Theory-based approaches for practical evaluation. Presented at Canadian Evaluation Society Annual Learning Event, February 21, 2012.

Montgomery, B. L. 2018. Building and sustaining diverse functioning networks using social media and digital platforms to improve diversity and inclusivity. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00022.

Morgan, M. G., R. Cantor, W. C. Clark, A. Fisher, H. D. Jacoby, A. C. Janetos, A. P. Kinzig, J. Melillo, R. B. Street, and T. J. Wilbanks. 2005. Learning from the U.S. national assessment of climate change impacts. Environmental Science & Technology 39(23):9023–9032. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050865i.

Morton, S. 2015. Creating research impact: The roles of research users in interactive research mobilization. Evidence & Policy 11(1):35–55. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514x13976529631798.

Morton, S., and A. Cook. 2023. How do you know if you are making a difference? A practical handbook for public service organisations. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

Moser, S. C. 2005. Stakeholder involvement in the first US national assessment of the potential consequences of climate variability and change: An evaluation, finally. Research report prepared for National Research Council, Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Change, Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, NAS/NRC, Washington, DC. http://www.susannemoser.com/documents/Moser_Draft_2-6-05.pdf.

Moss, R. H., S. Avery, K. Baja, M. Burkett, A. M. Chischilly, J. Dell, P. A. Fleming, K. Geil, K. Jacobs, A. Jones, K. Knowlton, J. Koh, M. C. Lemos, J. Melillo, R. Pandya, T. C. Richmond, L. Scarlett, J. Snyder, M. Stults, A. M. Waple, J. Whitehead, D. Zarrilli, B. M. Ayyub, J. Fox, A. Ganguly, L. Joppa, S. Julius, P. Kirshen, R. Kreutter, A. McGovern, R. Meyer, J. Neumann, W. Solecki, J. Smith, P. Tissot, G. Yohe, and R. Zimmerman. 2019. Evaluating knowledge to support climate action: A framework for sustained assessment: Report of an Independent Advisory Committee on Applied Climate Assessment. Weather, Climate, and Society 11(3):465–487. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-18-0134.1.

NASEM (National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016. Attribution of extreme weather events in the context of climate change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

———. 2017. Accomplishments of the U.S. Global Change Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24670.

———. 2023. Review of the draft: Fifth National Climate Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NAST (National Assessment Synthesis Team). 2000. Climate change impacts on the United States: The potential consequences of climate variability and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

NCEI (National Centers for Environmental Information). 2024. U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters (2024). https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/.

NCVO (National Council for Voluntary Organizations). 2023. Using secondary data. https://www.ncvo.org.uk/help-and-guidance/strategy-and-impact/impact-evaluation/planning-your-impact-and-evaluation/choosing-evaluation-methods/using-secondary-data.

Neuman, A., N. Shahor, I. Shina, A. Sarid, and Z. Saar. 2013. Evaluation utilization research: Developing a theory and putting it to use. Evaluation and Program Planning 36(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.06.001.

Newman, M. 2018. Networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Nisbet, M. C. 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51(2):12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23.

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association). 2024b. Coordinated federal climate networks to enhance adaptation and resilience at the regional scale. https://toolkit.climate.gov/content/federal-agency-coordination.

———. 2024c. Regional climate centers. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/regional/regional-climate-centers.

NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Analysis of global change assessments: Lessons learned. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

———. 2008. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12434.

———. 2013. A review of the draft: 2013 National Climate Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18322.

NSTC (National Science and Technology Council). 2023. A federal framework and action plan for climate services. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2023/03/FTAC_Report_03222023_508.pdf.

O’Reilly, J. L., M. Vardy, K. D. Pryck, and M. D. S. F. Benedetti. 2024. Inside the IPCC: How assessment practices shape climate knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1699F8274D52678F74FCAA3B65B13E1B.

Oliver, S., L. Clarke-Jones, R. Rees, R. Milne, P. Buchanan, J. Gabbay, G. Gyte, A. Oakley, and K. Stein. 2004. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: Developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment 8(15). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8150.

Oliver, S. R., R. W. Rees, L. Clarke-Jones, R. Milne, A. R. Oakley, J. Gabbay, K. Stein, P. Buchanan, and G. Gyte. 2008. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analyzing public involvement in health services research. Health Expectations 11(1):72–84.

OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 2022. President Biden’s FY 2023 budget reduces energy costs, combats the climate crisis, and advances environmental justice. https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2022/03/28/presidentbidens-fy-2023-budget-reduces-energy-costs-combats-the-climate-crisis-and-advances-environmental-justice/.

———. n.d. Federal collection of information. https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/information-regulatory-affairs/federal-collection-information/#IIPR.

Orlove, B., P. Sherpa, N. Dawson, I. Adelekan, W. Alangui, R. Carmona, D. Coen, M. K. Nelson, V. Reyes-García, and J. Rubis. 2023. Placing diverse knowledge systems at the core of transformative climate research. Ambio 52(9):1431–1447.

OSTP and FEMA (Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2021. Opportunities for expanding and improving climate information and services for the public: A report to the National Climate Task Force. https://downloads.globalchange.gov/reports/eo-14008-211-d-report.pdf.

Palinkas, L. A., S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42(5):533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.

Palomino, F., F. Paz, and A. Moquillaza. 2021. Web analytics for user experience: A systematic literature review. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research and Design, M. M. Soares, E. Rosenzweig, and A. Marcus (Eds.) Cham: Springer, pp. 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_21.

Paradis, E., B. O’Brien, L. Nimmon, G. Bandiera, and M. A. Martimianakis. 2016. Design: Selection of data collection methods. Journal of Graduate Medical Education 8(2):263–264. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-16-00098.1.

Parson, E. A., R. W. Corell, E. J. Barron, V. Burkett, A. Janetos, L. Joyce, T. R. Karl, M. C. Maccracken, J. Melillo, M. G. Morgan, D. S. Schimel, and T. Wilbanks. 2003. Understanding climatic impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in the United States: Building a capacity for assessment. Climatic Change 57(1/2):9–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022188519982.

Pasquini, G., and B. Kennedy. 2023. Americans continue to have doubts about climate scientists’ understanding of climate change. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/25/americans-continue-to-have-doubts-about-climate-scientists-understanding-of-climate-change/.

Pasquini, G., A. Spencer, A. Tyson, and C. Funk. 2023. Why some Americans do not see urgency on climate change. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/08/09/why-some-americans-do-not-see-urgency-on-climate-change/.

Patton, M. Q. (2003). Utilization-focused evaluation. In: International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer. T. Kellaghan, and D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_15.

———. 2012. Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. Sage.

———. 2013. Utilization-focused evaluation (U-FE) Checklist. Western Michigan University. https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2014/UFE_checklist_2013.pdf.

Perlino, C. 2006. The public health workforce shortage: Left unchecked, will we be protected? American Public Health Association. https://www.apha.org/media/files/pdf/factsheets/publichealthworkforceissuebrief.ashx.

Petzold, J., T. Hawxwell, K. Jantke, E. Gonçalves Gresse, C. Mirbach, I. Ajibade, S. Bhadwal, K. Bowen, A. P. Fischer, E. T. Joe, C. J. Kirchhoff, K. J. Mach, D. Reckien, A. C. Segnon, C. Singh, N. Ulibarri, D. Campbell, E. Cremin, L. Färber, G. Hegde, J. Jeong, A. M. Nunbogu, H. K. Pradhan, L. S. Schröder, M. A. R. Shah, P. Reese, F. Sultana, C. Tello, J. Xu, M. Garschagen, and The Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative. 2023. A global assessment of actors and their roles in climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change 13(11):1250–1257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01824-z.

Pew Research Center. 2020. Two-thirds of Americans think government should do more on climate. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wpcontent/uploads/sites/16/2020/06/PS_2020.06.23_government-climate_REPORT.pdf.

Popelier, L. 2018. A scoping review on the current and potential use of social network analysis for evaluation purposes. Evaluation 24(3):325–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018782219.

Puttick, S., and I. Talks. 2021. Teachers’ sources of information about climate change: A scoping review. The Curriculum Journal 33(3):378–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.136.

Rajkumar, K., G. Saint-Jacques, I. Bojinov, E. Brynjolfsson, and S. Aral. 2022. A causal test of the strength of weak ties. Science 377(6612):1304–1310. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4476.

Reed, M. S., B. G. Merkle, E. J. Cook, C. Hafferty, A. P. Hejnowicz, R. Holliman, I. D. Marder, U. Pool, C. M. Raymond, K. E. Wallen, D. Whyte, M. Ballesteros, S. Bhanbhro, S. Borota, M. L. Brennan, E. Carmen, E. A. Conway, R. Everett, F. Armstrong-Gibbs, E. Jensen, G. Koren, J. Lockett, P. Obani, S. O’Connor, L. Prange, J. Mason, S. Robinson, P. Shukla, A. Tarrant, A. Marchetti, and M. Stroobant. 2024. Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world. Sustainability Science 19:1481–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4.

Revelle, R., and H. E. Suess. 1957. Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO² during the past decades. Tellus 9(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01849.x.

Robins, G., D. Lusher, C. Broccatelli, D. Bright, C. Gallagher, M. A. Karkavandi, P. Matous, J. Coutinho, P. Wang, and J. Koskinen. 2023. Multilevel network interventions: Goals, actions, and outcomes. Social Networks 72:108–120.

Roca-Barceló, A., M. B. Rice, Y. Nunez, G. Thurston, G. Weinmayr, K. Straif, C. Roscoe, K. L. Ebi, Z. J. Andersen, A. de Nazelle, and M. Negev. 2024. Climate action has valuable health benefits. Environmental Epidemiology 8(1):e288. https://doi.org/10.1097/ee9.0000000000000288.

Rodriguez-Franco, C., and T. J. Haan. 2015. Understanding climate change perceptions, attitudes, and needs of Forest Service resource managers. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34(5):423–444.

Rogers, P. J. 2008. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation 14(1):29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007084674.

Romanello, M., C. D. Napoli, C. Green, H. Kennard, P. Lampard, D. Scamman, M. Walawender, Z. Ali, N. Ameli, S. Ayeb-Karlsson, P. J. Beggs, K. Belesova, L. Berrang Ford, K. Bowen, W. Cai, M. Callaghan, D. Campbell-Lendrum, J. Chambers, T. J. Cross, K. R. van Daalen, C. Dalin, N. Dasandi, S. Dasgupta, M. Davies, P. Dominguez-Salas, R. Dubrow, K. L. Ebi, M. Eckelman, P. Ekins, C. Freyberg, O. Gasparyan, G. Gordon-Strachan, H. Graham, S. H. Gunther, I. Hamilton, Y. Hang, R. Hänninen, S. Hartinger, K. He, J. Heidecke, J. J. Hess, S. C. Hsu, L. Jamart, S. Jankin, O. Jay, I. Kelman, G. Kiesewetter, P. Kinney, D. Kniveton, R. Kouznetsov, F. Larosa, J. K. W. Lee, B. Lemke, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, M. Lott, M. Lotto Batista, R. Lowe, M. Odhiambo Sewe, J. Martinez-Urtaza, M. Maslin, L. McAllister, C. McMichael, Z. Mi, J. Milner, K. Minor, J. C. Minx, N. Mohajeri, N. C. Momen, M. Moradi-Lakeh, K. Morrissey, S. Munzert, K. A. Murray, T. Neville, M. Nilsson, N. Obradovich, M. B. O’Hare, C. Oliveira, T. Oreszczyn, M. Otto, F. Owfi, O. Pearman, F. Pega, A. Pershing, M. Rabbaniha, J. Rickman, E. J. Z. Robinson, J. Rocklöv, R. N. Salas, J. C. Semenza, J. D. Sherman, J. Shumake-Guillemot, G. Silbert, M. Sofiev, M. Springmann, J. D. Stowell, M. Tabatabaei, J. Taylor, R. Thompson, C. Tonne, M. Treskova, J. A. Trinanes, F. Wagner, L. Warnecke, H. Whitcombe, M. Winning, A. Wyns, M. Yglesias-González, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhu, P. Gong, H. Montgomery, and A. Costello. 2023. The 2023 report of the Lancet: Countdown on health and climate change: The imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms. Lancet 402(10419):2346–2394. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01859-7.

Roozenbeek, J., S. Van Der Linden, and T. Nygren. 2020. Prebunking interventions based on the psychological theory of “inoculation” can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008.

Rosenstock, L., C. Olenec, and G. R. Wagner. 1998. The National Occupational Research Agenda: A model of broad stakeholder input into priority setting. American Journal of Public Health 88(3):353–356. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.88.3.353.

Rudolph, L., and S. Gould. 2015. Climate Change and health inequities: A framework for action. Annals of Global Health 81(3):432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.06.003.

Salganik, M. J. 2019. Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Schulte-Uebbing, L., G. Hansen, A. M. Hernández, and M. Winter. 2015. Chapter scientists in the IPCC AR5: Experience and lessons learned. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14:250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.012.

Sheehan, M. C., M. A. Fox, C. Kaye, and B. Resnick. 2017. Integrating health into local climate response: Lessons from the U.S. CDC Climate-Ready States and Cities Initiative. Environmental Health Perspectives 125(9):094501. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp1838.

Sibbald, S. L., J. C. MacGregor, M. Surmacz, and C. N. Wathen. 2015. Into the gray: A modified approach to citation analysis to better understand research impact. Journal of the Medical Library Association 103(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.1.010.

Simons, H. 2021. Media and politics. In Encyclopedia of American studies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Smit, L. C., J. Dikken, M. J. Schuurmans, N. J. De Wit, and N. Bleijenberg. 2020. Value of social network analysis for developing and evaluating complex healthcare interventions: A scoping review. BMJ Open 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039681.

Smith, A. B. 2020. U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters, 1980 - present (NCEI Accession 0209268).

Smith, P. A. 2001. Action learning and reflective practice in project environments that are related to leadership development. Management Learning 32(1):31–48.

Steg, L. 2023. Psychology of climate change. Annual Review of Psychology 74:391–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-042905.

Stern, A., S. Guckenburg, H. Persson, A. Petrosino, and J. Poirier. 2019. Reflections on applying principles of equitable evaluation. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.

Taherdoost, H. 2021. Data collection methods and tools for research: A step-by-step guide to choose data collection technique for academic and business research projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management 10(1):10–38.

Tart, S., M. Groth, and P. Seipold. 2020. Market demand for climate services: An assessment of users’ needs. Climate Services 17:100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100109.

Thelwall, M. 2012. A history of webometrics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 38(6):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2012.1720380606.

Thomann, E., and M. Maggetti. 2020. Designing research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Approaches, challenges, and tools. Sociological Methods & Research 49(2):356–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700.

Thomas, M. S. 2020. Equity in program evaluation: Equity as a measure in program evaluation. School of Professional and Continuing Studies Nonprofit Studies Capstone Projects. University of Richmond. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/spcs-nonprofitstudies-capstones/21/

Treen, K. M. d’I., H. T. P. Williams, and S. J. O’Neill. 2020. Online misinformation about climate change. WIREs Climate Change 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665.

Trevisan, M. S. 2007. Evaluability assessment from 1986 to 2006. American Journal of Evaluation 28(3):290–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214007304589.

Tripati, A., M. Shepherd, V. Morris, K. Andrade, K. P. Whyte, D. M. David-Chavez, J. Hosbey, J. E. Trujillo-Falcón, B. Hunter, D. Hence, D. Carlis, V. Brown, W. L. Parker, A. Geller, A. Reich, and M. Glackin. 2024. Centering equity in the nation’s weather, water, and climate services. Environmental Justice 17(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0048.

Tsang, E. W. K. 2014. Generalizing from research findings: The merits of case studies. International Journal of Management Reviews 16(4):369–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12024.

Turek-Hankins, L. L., E. Coughlan de Perez, G. Scarpa, R. Ruiz-Diaz, P. N. Schwerdtle, E. T. Joe, E. K. Galappaththi, E. M. French, S. E. Austin, C. Singh, M. Siña, A. R. Siders, M. K. van Aalst, S. Templeman, A. M. Nunbogu, L. Berrang-Ford, T. Agrawal, the Global Systematic Review of Implemented Action Team, and K. J. Mach. 2021. Climate change adaptation to extreme heat: A global systematic review of implemented action. Oxford Open Climate Change 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgab005.

Turrentine, J. 2022. Climate misinformation on social media is undermining climate action. Natural Resources Defense Council. https://www.nrdc.org/stories/climate-misinformation-social-media-undermining-climate-action.

Tyson, A., and B. Kennedy. 2023. How Americans view future harms from climate change in their community and around the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/10/25/how-americans-view-future-harms-from-climate-change-in-their-community-and-around-the-u-s/.

Tyson, A., C. Funk, and B. Kennedy. 2023. What the data says about Americans’ views of climate change. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/09/what-the-data-says-about-americans-views-of-climate-change/.

University of Wisconsin Extension. 2024. Enhancing program performance with logic models. https://logicmodel.extension.wisc.edu/

U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit. n.d. Interagency collaboration: Three federal climate networks partner to enhance regional adaptation and resilience. https://toolkit.climate.gov/sites/default/files/CPO_InteragencyCollaboration_20220105%20-%20FINAL.pdf.

USAID. 2013. Technical note: Evaluation case studies. https://usaidlearninglab.org/system/files/resource/files/usaid_case_study_tech_note_2013.pdf.

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2021. USDA climate hubs strategic plan 2020-2025. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/Strategic_Plan_Climate_Hubs_2020_2025_FINAL_v1.pdf

———. 2023a. Climate hubs quarterly reporting. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/climate-hubs-quarterly-reporting.

———. 2023b. The USDA climate hubs: A national resource for climate science, tools, and information. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/hubs/northwest/news/usda-climate-hubs-national-resource-climate-science-tools-and-information.

———. 2024. Environmental justice. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/priorities/environmental-justice?page=1.

———. n.d.-a. Northwest adaptation in action. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/hubs/northwest/topic/northwest-adaptation-action.

———. n.d.-b. Northwest vulnerability assessments. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/hubs/northwest/topic/northwest-vulnerability-assessments.

———. n.d.-c. Welcome to the USDA Northwest Climate Hub. https://www.climatehubs.usda.gov/hubs/northwest/tools.

USGCRP (U.S. Global Change Research Program). 2014. Frameworks for evaluating the National Climate Assessment: Workshop report. https://downloads.globalchange.gov/nca/workshop-reports/NCA-Evaluation-Frameworks-Workshop-Report-2014-final.pdf.

———. 2016a. The NCA in review: Frameworks for evaluation. https://www.globalchange.gov/highlights/nca-review-frameworks-evaluation.

———. 2016b. The impacts of climate change on human health in the United States: A scientific assessment. https://health2016.globalchange.gov.

———. 2018. Summary findings: Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II. https://nca2018.globalchange.gov.

———. 2023b. Fifth National Climate Assessment public comment period & National Academies review annotation. https://nca2023.globalchange.gov/downloads/NCA5_Public-Comments-Author-Responses-TOD.pdf.

———. 2023c. Fifth national climate assessment, edited by A. R. Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, and T. K. Maycock. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.

———. 2023e. Front matter. In Fifth National Climate Assessment, Crimmins, A. R., C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, and T. K. Maycock, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.FM.

———. 2024. Our changing planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for fiscal year 2024. https://downloads.globalchange.gov/ocp/ocp2024/Our-Changing-Planet_FY2024.pdf.

———. n.d. Interagency crosscutting group on climate change and health. https://globalchange.gov/our-work/interagency-groups/cchhg.

Valente, T. W. 2012. Network interventions. Science 337(6090):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217330.

Valente, T. W. 2017. Putting the network in network interventions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(36): 9500-9501. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712473114.

Van Der Linden, S., A. Leiserowitz, S. Rosenthal, and E. Maibach. 2017. Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges 1(2):e1600008. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008.

Vartanian, T. P. 2010. Secondary data analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Vasileiadou, E., G. Heimeriks, and A. C. Petersen. 2011. Exploring the impact of the IPCC assessment reports on science. Environmental Science & Policy 14(8):1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.002.

Vasquez, K. S., S. Chatterjee, C. Khalida, D. Moftah, B. D’Orazio, A. Leinberger-Jabari, J. N. Tobin, and R. G. Kost. 2020. Using attendance data for social network analysis of a community-engaged research partnership. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 5(1):e75. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.571.

Vedung, E. 2017. Public policy and program evaluation. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127767.

Venturini, T., K. D. Pryck, and R. Ackland. 2023. Bridging in network organisations. The case of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).” Social Networks 75:137–147.

Vignola, R., T. L. McDaniels, and R. W. Scholz. 2013. Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: Using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas. Environmental Science & Policy 31:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.004.

Walker, T. 2023. Survey: Teachers work more hours per week than other working adults. National Education Association. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/survey-teachers-work-more-hours-week-other-working-adults#:~:text=In%20the%20new%20national%20survey,survey%20of%20all%20working%20adults

Wasserman, S., and K, Faust, 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Weaver, C. P., C. Allen, N. Beller-Simms, T. Fish, A. Grambsch, P. Hipple, M. Kenney, L. Langner, L. Larson, J. S. Lee, L. Marshall, D. McGinnis, S. Mooney, L. Nichols, C. Nierenberg, M. Rockman, A. Rypinski, E. Seyller, and R. Winthrop. 2014. Social sciences integration to support USGCRP strategic plan implementation: A white paper of the USGCRP Social Sciences Task Force.

Weaver, C. P., S. Mooney, D. Allen, N. Beller-Simms, T. Fish, A. E. Grambsch, W. Hohenstein, K. Jacobs, M. A. Kenney, M. A. Lane, L. Langner, E. Larson, D. L. McGinnis, R. H. Moss, L. G. Nichols, C. Nierenberg, E. A. Seyller, P. C. Stern, and R. Winthrop. 2014. From global change science to action with social sciences. Nature Climate Change 4(8):656–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2319.

Weible, C. M., and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 2016. The advocacy coalition framework: An approach for the comparative analysis of contentious policy issues. In Contemporary approaches to public policy: Theories, controversies and perspectives, edited by B. G. Peters, and P. Zittoun. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50494-4_2.

Weible, C. M., K. Ingold, D. Nohrstedt, A. D. Henry, and H. C. Jenkins-Smith. 2020. Sharpening advocacy coalitions. Policy Studies Journal 48(4):1054–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12360.

Weiss, C. H. 1998. Methods for studying programs and policies, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

West, J. D., and C. T. Bergstrom. 2021. Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(15):e1912444117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912444117.

Whiteman, D. 1985. The fate of policy analysis in congressional decision making: Three types of use in committees. Western Political Quarterly 38(2):294–311.

Whyte, K. 2017. Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes 55(1):153–162.

Whyte, W. F. 1989. Advancing scientific knowledge through participatory action research. Sociological Forum 4(3):367–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115015.

Wimbush, E., S. Montague, and T. Mulherin. 2012. Applications of contribution analysis to outcome planning and impact evaluation. Evaluation 18(3):310–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012452052.

Worrall, J. L., and E. G. Cohn. 2023. Citation data and analysis: Limitations and shortcomings. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 39(3):327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862231170972.

Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Zhao, D., and A. Strotmann. 2015. Analysis and visualization of citation networks. California: Morgan & Claypool.

Zhao, X., E. Maibach, J. Gandy, J. Witte, H. Cullen, B. A. Klinger, K. E. Rowan, J. Witte, and A. Pyle. 2014. Climate change education through TV weathercasts: Results of a field experiment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95(1):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-12-00144.1.