Skip to main content
Initiative

Independent Scientific Review of Everglades Restoration Progress

This Congressionally mandated activity will review the progress toward achieving the natural system restoration goals of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). The Committee on Independent Scientific Review of Everglades Restoration will provide biennial reports that include: (1) an assessment of progress in restoring the natural system, (2) discussion of significant accomplishments of the restoration, (3) discussion and evaluation of specific scientific and engineering issues that may impact progress , and (4) a review of monitoring and assessment protocols to be used for evaluation of CERP progress.

Banner-Independent-Scientific-Review-of-Everglades-Restoration-Progress-X.jpg | https://nasemoceprodcomm-nationalacademies.cec.ocp.oraclecloud.com/content/published/api/v1.1/assets/CONT8F435135ACD747CD8DB1D68F7C58D3AC/native?cb=_cache_daba&format=webp&channelToken=d2dc71410b56f1d61406108f1738d0f4

Recently completed

A committee-supported project or activity that has been completed and for which output dissemination has begun. Its committee has been disbanded and closeout procedures are underway.

Description

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will convene an ad hoc consensus study to review the progress toward achieving the restoration goals of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). To this end, the Committee on Independent Scientific Review of Everglades Restoration Progress will meet two to three times annually to receive briefings on the current status of the CERP, scientific issues involved in implementing the Plan, and natural system restoration progress. The committee will produce a biennial report that will provide:

(1) an assessment of progress in restoring the natural system, which is defined by section 601(a) of WRDA 2000 as “all the land and water managed by the federal government and state within the South Florida Ecosystem;

(2) discussion of significant accomplishments of the restoration;

(3) discussion and evaluation of specific scientific and engineering issues that may impact progress in achieving the natural system restoration goals of the Plan; and

(4) an independent review of monitoring and assessment protocols to be used for evaluation of CERP progress (e.g., CERP performance measures, annual assessment reports, assessment strategies).

Work with Us
Looking for independent, nonpartisan guidance from the nation’s top subject-matter experts? We stand ready to help potential sponsors across a variety of sectors shape research and policy agendas, regulation, investments, operations, state and local initiatives, and more.
Keck building

Collaborators

Sponsors

Department of Defense

Department of Interior

Department of the Army

South Florida Water Management District

Staff

Stephanie Johnson

Lead

SJohnson@nas.edu

Emily Bermudez

EBermudez@nas.edu

Charles Burgis

CBurgis@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.