Consensus Study Report

NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001

This activity was supported by Contract No. 28321323D00060012 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Social Security Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-99306-7
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/29137
Library of Congress Control Number: 2025944623

This publication is available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242; http://www.nap.edu.

The manufacturer’s authorized representative in the European Union for product safety is Authorised Rep Compliance Ltd., Ground Floor, 71 Lower Baggot Street, Dublin D02 P593 Ireland; www.arccompliance.com.

Copyright 2025 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and National Academies Press and the graphical logos for each are all trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America.

Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Sickle cell disease in Social Security disability evaluations: Pain and treatment settings. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/29137.

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. Tsu-Jae Liu is president.

The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.

The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.

Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.

Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.

Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.

Rapid Expert Consultations published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are authored by subject-matter experts on narrowly focused topics that can be supported by a body of evidence. The discussions contained in rapid expert consultations are considered those of the authors and do not contain policy recommendations. Rapid expert consultations are reviewed by the institution before release.

For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.

COMMITTEE ON SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY EVALUATIONS

PAUL A. VOLBERDING (Chair), University of California, San Francisco (emeritus)

JENNIFER I. KOOP (Vice Chair), Medical College of Wisconsin and Children’s Wisconsin

MARILYN S. BAFFOE-BONNIE, University of Pennsylvania

CECELIA L. CALHOUN, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Hospital

JEFFREY A. GLASSBERG, Mount Sinai Center for Sickle Cell Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

CORETTA M. JENERETTE, University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing

ASHLEY M. JENKINS, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry

SHIRLEY A. JOHNSON, Virginia Commonwealth University

PATRICIA L. KAVANAGH, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine

MARTHA O. KENNEY (through April 2025), Duke University School of Medicine

JERLYM PORTER, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

ALEXANDRA POWER-HAYS, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati

TED WUN, University of California (UC), Davis Clinical and Translational Science Center and UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study Staff

CAROL MASON SPICER, Study Director

ELIZABETH FERRÉ, Research Associate

ELIANA PIEROTTI, Senior Program Assistant

JOSEPH GOODMAN, Senior Program Assistant

SHARYL NASS, Senior Board Director, Board on Health Care Services

Consultant

JOE ALPER, Science Writer

This page intentionally left blank.

Reviewers

This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

We thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions of this report nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by JUDITH GREEN MCKENZIE, University of Pennsylvania, and DAN G. BLAZER, Duke University Medical Center. They were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies.

Acknowledgments

The committee extends its sincere thanks to the many individuals who shared their time and expertise to support its work and inform its deliberations. The Social Security Administration (SSA) funded the study, and we thank Michael Goldstein, Vincent Nibali, Andrea Bento, and Megan Butson for their guidance and support. The committee also acknowledges representatives at SSA for verifying relevant technical content pertaining to the disability determination process for accuracy. The committee also benefited greatly from discussions with individuals, including those with lived experience, who participated in the committee’s webinars: Amanda Brandow, Pat Carroll, Payal Desai, Ruchi Doshi, Omini Ewah, Titilope Fasipe, Caroline E. Freiermuth, Kelly Harris, Teanika Hoffman, Golda Houndoh, Mary Hulihan, Vesha Jamison, Eboni Lance, Tristan Lee, Lakeya McGill, Jean Leclerc Raphael, Carolyn Rowley, Christelle Salomon, Wally Smith, Daniel Sop, Sharee Turpin, Nikia K. Vaughan, Teonna Woolford, and Lara Zador. The committee also thanks all the individuals who submitted written responses to the committee’s Call for Perspectives.

Our appreciation goes to the reviewers for their invaluable feedback on an earlier draft of the report and to the monitor and coordinator who oversaw the report review.

The committee acknowledges the many staff within the Health and Medicine Division (HMD) who provided support in various ways to this project, including Carol Mason Spicer (study director), Elizabeth Ferré (research associate), Eliana Pierotti (senior program assistant), and Joseph Goodman (senior program assistant). The committee extends great thanks and appreciation to Sharyl Nass, senior board director, Board on Health

Care Services, who oversaw the project. Christopher Lao-Scott (senior librarian) performed literature searches for the committee; Greysi Patton (finance business partner), Julie Wiltshire (senior finance business partner), and Ron Brown (deputy director, HMD program finance) oversaw finances for the project; and the report review, production, and communications staff all provided valuable guidance to ensure the success of the final product. Joe Alper provided superb writing and editorial assistance in preparing the report.

Contents

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

SUMMARY

Context for This Study

Study Charge and Scope

Study Approach

The Committee’s Overarching Conclusions

1 INTRODUCTION

Study Charge and Scope

Terminology and Definitions

Background and Basics of Sickle Cell Disease

The Treatment Landscape of Sickle Cell Disease

Social Security Administration Disability Evaluation Process

Social Security Administration’s Current Listings for Sickle Cell Disease

Study Approach

Organization of the Report

References

2 PAIN IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE

Terminology

Acute Pain Pathophysiology

Chronic Pain Pathophysiology

Experience of Pain

Timing and “Phases” of Vaso-occlusive Crises

Quantifying the Burden of Pain

Triggers

Diagnosis

Functional Impact

Summary and Conclusions

References

3 PAIN MANAGEMENT IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE

The Overall State of Pain Management in Sickle Cell Disease

Pain Mitigation in Sickle Cell Disease

Pain Management in Sickle Cell Disease

Summary and Conclusions

References

4 HEALTH CARE DELIVERY IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE: PATIENT CHOICES, CARE SETTINGS, AND HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS

Care Settings and Health Care Providers Involved in Care

Deciding to Escalate Care

Health Care Provider Decisions to Admit to the Hospital

Factors Unique to Sickle Cell Disease in Making Decisions Related to Hospitalization

Factors Affecting Length of Hospitalization

Navigating Care Transitions and the Discharge Process

Factors Contributing to Hospital Readmission

Summary and Conclusions

References

5 OVERARCHING CONCLUSIONS

Sickle Cell Disease and Disability Determination

Sickle Cell Disease

Proxies for Severity of Sickle Cell Disease

APPENDIXES

A Public Meeting Agendas

B Biographical Sketches of Committee Members

Boxes, Figures, and Table

BOXES

S-1 Statement of Task

1-1 Statement of Task

1-2 Definitions of Selected Terms

4-1 Decision Tree: Managing Sickle Cell Pain at Home to Hospitalization

FIGURES

1-1 The shape of normal and sickled red blood cells

1-2 Models of care for adults with SCD

1-3 Roadmap illustrating the SSA disability evaluation process for adults

1-4 Roadmap illustrating the SSA disability evaluation process for children

1-5 Major body systems and examples of childhood listings applying to common complications of SCD

1-6 Major body systems and examples of adult listings applying to common complications of SCD

2-1 Overview of initiation and progression of vaso-occlusive crisis in SCD

2-2 Two sequential painful crises with residual pain of variable severity during the time between them

4-1 Average number of emergency department visits that resulted in release after treatment by age for people living with SCD in two states

4-2 Variation in emergency department visits for one person living with SCD

4-3 Hospital admissions that began in the emergency department by age for people living with SCD in two states

4-4 Average number of hospital admissions by age for people living with SCD in two states

4-5 Average length of hospitalization by age for people living with SCD in two states

4-6 Hospital admissions with a hospital readmission or emergency department visit within 30 days of discharge by age for people living with SCD in two states

TABLE

4-1 Acute SCD Care Settings

Acronyms and Abbreviations

This page intentionally left blank.