Completed
Section 3125 of the FY2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) calls for a national labs team to develop a framework of decisions to be made among the supplemental treatment technologies, waste forms, and disposal locations for low-activity waste in the Hanford tanks. In addition, Section 3125 requests additional analysis for the grout treatment approach as identified in the previous report for Section 3134 of the FY 2017 NDAA. As in the previous study, the Academies will convene a committee of experts to provide a concurrent review of the national labs team's continuing draft and final analytic frameworks.
Featured publication
Consensus
·2023
The Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the state of Washington produced about two-thirds of the nations plutonium for nuclear weapons from 1944 until the last reactor was shut down in 1987. The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) manages the ongoing clean-up at Hanfor...
View details
Description
An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will review the analysis carried out by the Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) selected by the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management on approaches for supplemental treatment of low-activity waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. The review will evaluate the technical quality and completeness of the following:
- Does the FFRDC’s report clearly lay out a framework of decisions to be made among the treatment technologies, waste forms, and disposal locations?
- Does the FFRDC’s report consider in its analysis all the elements, criteria, and factors specified in Section 3125 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2021?
- Does the FFRDC’s report provide additional analysis for the grout treatment approach as identified in the FFRDC report for Section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2017?
The review will be carried out concurrently with the FFRDC’s analysis with opportunities for input from the Washington State Department of Ecology, other principal Hanford stakeholders, and members of the public. The study will produce three consensus reports containing findings and recommendations. The first report will focus on study charges 1 and 2. It will be produced after the FFRDC briefs the committee on its plans for carrying out the mandated assessments and delivers to the committee a draft of the framework as described in Section 3125 of the NDAA of 2021. The second report will focus on study charges 1, 2, and 3. It will be produced after the FFRDC presents and delivers to the committee its next-to-final draft framework document. This report will also provide a summary of public comments, including comments from the Washington State Department of Ecology, received during a minimum 60-day comment period, on the committee’s review and the next-to-final draft of the FFRDC report. The third report will review the FFRDC’s final assessment results.
Collaborators
Committee
Chair
Vice Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Staff Officer
Staff Officer
Committee Membership Roster Comments
Bob Mansiell is working with the committee as a consultant. He is Vice President of Studsvik, Inc., where he is responsible for providing engineering support to the Waste Management Technology division and their patented treatment technologies, including Fluidized Bed Steam Reform. He has more than 25 years of experience in engineering and construction with extensive experience in the design of complex process systems for a wide variety of applications. Bob oversees all aspects of Studsvik, Inc., a US-based company located in Atlanta, Georgia. He holds a bachelor and master’s engineering degrees in chemical engineering, respectively, from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Sponsors
Department of Energy
Staff
Michael Janicke
Lead
Darlene M Gros
Leslie Beauchamp
