Skip to main content

The Impact of Biotechnology on Farm Economics and Sustainability

Completed

Since genetically engineered (GE) crops were introduced, their use in the United States has grown rapidly, accounting for 80-90 percent of soybean, corn, and cotton acreage in 2009. To date, crops with traits that provide resistance to some herbicides and to specific insect pests have benefited adopting farmers by reducing crop losses to insect damage, by increasing flexibility in time management, and by facilitating the use of more environmentally friendly pesticides and tillage practices. However, excessive reliance on a single technology combined with a lack of diverse farming practices could undermine the economic and environmental gains from these crops.

Description

An NRC committee will study the farm-level impacts of biotechnology, including the economics of adopting genetically engineered crops, changes in producer decision-making and agronomic practices, and farm sustainability. The study will:--review and analyze the published literature on the impact of GE crops on the productivity and economics of farms in the United States;--examine evidence for changes in agronomic practices and inputs, such pesticide and herbicide use, soil and water management regimes;--evaluate producer decision-making with regard to the adoption of genetically-engineered crops;In a consensus report, the committee will present the findings of its study and identify future applications of plant and animal biotechnology that are likely to affect agriculture producers decision-making in the future.This project is sponsored by the National Research Council.The approximate start date for the project is September 30, 2008.A report will be issued at the end of the project in approximately 12 months.Note: The project duration was extended. The report is expected to be issued in April 2010.

Contributors

Committee

Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Download all bios

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Disclosure of Conflict of Interest: Michele Marra

In accordance with Section 15 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the "Academy shall make its best efforts to ensure that no individual appointed to serve on [a] committee has a conflict of interest that is relevant to the functions to be performed, unless such conflict is promptly and publicly disclosed and the Academy determines that the conflict is unavoidable." A conflict of interest refers to an interest, ordinarily financial, of an individual that could be directly affected by the work of the committee. As specified in the Academy's policy and procedures (http://www.nationalacademies.org/coi/index.html), an objective determination is made for each provisionally appointed committee member whether or not a conflict of interest exists given the facts of the individual's financial and other interests and the task being undertaken by the committee. A determination of a conflict of interest for an individual is not an assessment of that individual's actual behavior or character or ability to act objectively despite the conflicting interest.

We have concluded that for this committee to accomplish the tasks for which it was established its membership must include among others, at least one person who has expertise in evaluating the performance of stacked varieties of genetically engineered crops relative to farmer’s opportunity costs (such as yield risk and cost of crop insurance), particularly with respect to cotton and soybeans in the Southeast.

To meet the need for this expertise and experience, Dr. Michele Marra is proposed for appointment to the committee even though we have concluded that she has a conflict of interest because she consults through the firm Agri-Analytics, Inc., and as such Dr. Marra works with Monsanto on yield risk and crop insurance programs for genetically engineered crops.

Dr. Marra is a nationally recognized expert in the economics of new agricultural innovations. As an extension specialist, her analysis of the yield performance associated with genetically-engineered and conventional varieties of corn and soybean makes her uniquely familiar with the yield and risk trade-offs faced by farmers in the Southeast when choosing which varieties to plant. This expertise in farmers’ choices and their decision-making process is critical for the committee in meeting its task. We believe that Dr. Marra can serve effectively as a member of the committee and that the committee can produce an objective report, taking into account the composition of the committee, the work to be performed, and the procedures to be followed in completing the work.

After an extensive search, we have been unable to find another individual with the equivalent combination of current practical and regional experience and expertise as Dr. Marra who does not have a conflict of interest. Therefore, we have concluded that this potential conflict is unavoidable.

Sponsors

National Academies

Staff

Kara N. Laney

Lead

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.