Completed
Topics
The Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCC) Network was established to complement and add value to the many ongoing state, tribal, federal, and nongovernmental efforts to address the challenge of conserving species, habitats, ecosystem services, and cultural resources in the face of large-scale and long-term threats, including climate change. This report evaluates the purpose, goals, and scientific merits of the LCC program within the context of similar programs, and whether the program has resulted in measurable improvements in the health of fish, wildlife, and their habitats.
Featured publication
Consensus
·2016
The United States' tradition of conserving fish, wildlife, habitats, and cultural resources dates to the mid-19th century. States have long sought to manage fish and wildlife species within their borders, whereas many early federal conservation efforts focused on setting aside specific places as par...
View details
Description
The National Academy of Sciences will convene an ad hoc committee to examine the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCC) program. This committee will evaluate the purpose, goals, and scientific merits of the program within the context of similar programs, and whether the LCC program has resulted in measurable improvements in the health of fish, wildlife, and their habitats. This will include:
1. An evaluation of the scientific merit of the LCC program and its goals.
2. A comparison of the stated purpose and goals of the LCC with other similar programs. How are these programs similar, and how do they differ? Is there substantial overlap in their mission and purpose? If so, is there rationale for and benefit from this overlap? Is there sufficient coordination with these related programs?
3. A comparison of the types of projects, activities, and collaborationssupported by LCC and related programs.
- Do the projects, activities, and collaborations supported by the LCC program overlap significantly with the traditional portfolio of other FWS programs (as the primary sponsoring agency)? Is there sufficient coordination and integration with these related programs? What benefit, if any, is gained by moving and/or consolidating this work within the LCC program? What effectiveness or efficiency is lost, if any, by housing this work within the LCC program? What changes can the FWS consider to address concerns?
- Do the projects, activities, and collaborationssupported by the LCC program overlap significantly with the portfolio of related programs in other agencies? Is there sufficient coordination with these related programs?
4. An examination of the evaluation process for the LCC program. What is FWS’s strategy to assess the effectiveness (output and outcomes)of the LCC program? What are reasonable short, medium, and long-term metrics for the effectiveness of the LCC program in achieving its stated purpose and goals?
5. An assessment of the impacts of the LCC programat various scales. What goals (and/or objectives)have been achieved? What improvements in managing and conserving habitat and fish and wildlife species might be reasonable to expect from the LCC program in the timeframe it has existed? What longer-term impacts are likely to be realized?
Collaborators
Committee
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Sponsors
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Staff
Claudia Mengelt
Lead