A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs (2009)

Chapter: APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field

Previous Chapter: 5 An Example
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 33
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 34
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 35
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 36
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 37
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 38
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 39
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 40
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 41
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 42
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 43
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 44
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 45
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 46
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 47
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 48
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 49
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 50
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 51
Suggested Citation: "APPENDIX A A Technical Discussion of the Process of Rating and Ranking Programs in a Field." National Research Council. 2009. A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12676.
Page 52
Next Chapter: APPENDIX B Questionnaires
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.