
Nelson\Nygaard has been retained by the Transportation Research Board/Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) to develop a framework for evaluating fare-free public transportation. The research will examine the benefits, costs, and tradeoffs that must be considered by public transit agencies, policymakers, and other stakeholders as they look towards full or partial elimination of fares. As part of this research, we are surveying transit agencies in two categories: (1) agencies that currently provide full or partial fare-free service and (2) agencies without existing fare-free service. This survey is directed to transit agencies in the first category. Although many transit agencies temporarily implemented fare-free service starting in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our research is only focusing on evaluating permanent fare-free service. If you have received the wrong survey, please contact our Principal Investigator, Cristina Barone, at cbarone@nelsonnygaard.com.
For the purposes of this research, we are defining partial fare-free transit agencies as those that:
The questions in this survey are designed to get an understanding of the factors that go into evaluation and implementation of fare free service. If you have the data available, we would appreciate information about ridership, on-time performance,
service changes, capital investments, operating costs, fare collection costs, and transit agency revenues as they relate to fare-free transit at your agency. If detailed data is not available, estimates or opinions are sufficient. You are encouraged to collaborate with your transit agency colleagues to complete the survey. Individual names and titles will be anonymized prior to the publication of the framework, but survey responses may be associated with your transit agency.
Please complete and submit this survey by Friday, April 30th, 2021. If you have questions regarding this survey or the research project, please contact Cristina Barone at cbarone@nelsonnygaard.com. You may be contacted by Nelson\Nygaard after the survey is complete to help clarify your answers or obtain additional information.
Name of transit agency:
Respondent name(s):
Respondent role(s):
Email address(es):
Phone number(s):
Yes
No
Fully fare-free
Partially fare-free. For what groups and/or what services?
Not applicable
Yes
No
Not sure
If yes, what were the goals and objectives and how did, or will, fare-free service help the agency reach those goals?
Feasibility study
Fare-free pilot
Best practices and/or peer agency review
Other
Not sure
Not applicable
Any details you would like to share?
Yes, considered and/or studied
Yes, we studied it and decided to not implement fully fare-free service (skip to Q. 13)
No (skip to Q. 14)
Not sure (skip to Q. 14)
Not applicable (skip to Q. 14)
All riders and services
Specific groups of riders
Specific services, modes, or routes
Not sure
Not applicable
What specific groups or services?
Not applicable
Not applicable
Yes
No (skip to Q. 17)
Not sure (skip to Q. 17)
Farebox recovery ratio prior to fare-free implementation:
Farebox recovery ratio since initiating fare-free service (ideally 2019 data):
Yes
No
Not sure
Not applicable
If yes, what methods were used?
Yes
No
Not sure
Not applicable
If yes, what methods were used?
Very supportive
Supportive
Neutral
Not supportive
Very unsupportive
Any details you would like to share?
Yes
No
Not sure
Any details you would like to share?
The following questions ask about any changes and policies that were seen or anticipated because of new fare-free service. If the transit agency has always been partially or fully fare-free and is not considering, studying, or implementing additional fare-free service, skip to Q. 44.
Increase in ridership
No change in ridership
Decrease in ridership
Not sure
If ridership changed, by how much? An estimate is fine.
Yes
No
Not sure
Not applicable
If yes, can you provide more detail?
By drivers on paper
By drivers with tablets or other digital technology
Automatic Passenger Counters (APCs)
Manual ride checks on a sampling of trips
Other:
By drivers on paper
By drivers with tablets or other digital technology
At the farebox
Automatic Passenger Counters (APCs)
Manual ride checks on a sampling of trips
Other
Not sure
Not applicable
Improvement in on-time performance
No change in on-time performance
Deterioration in on-time performance
Not sure
Any details to share?
Increased service
Increased service unrelated to fare-free implementation
No significant change to service
Changes to service that did not require additional resources
Reduced service
Not sure
If there was a change, how much in revenue hours? An estimate is fine. If additional resources were not needed, can you provide more detail about the changes?
Yes, administrative employees
Yes, operations employees
Yes, maintenance employees
Yes, other employees
No
Not sure
If yes, how many staff members (full-time equivalents) did you have prior to implementation and how many additional staff did you hire? An estimate is fine.
Yes, additional fixed-route vehicles
Yes, additional paratransit vehicles
Yes, other additional vehicles
No
Not sure
If yes, how many additional vehicles (of each type)? An estimate is fine.
Yes
No
Not sure
If yes, which facilities and what was the approximate value?
Yes
No
Not sure
Year of evaluation:
Capital costs:
Operating costs:
Administrative costs:
Yes
No
Not sure
Any details you would like to share?
Increase in ridership
No change in ridership
Decrease in ridership
Not sure
If paratransit ridership was impacted, by how much? An estimate is fine.
Increase in revenue hours
No change in revenue hours
Decrease in revenue hours
Not sure
If paratransit service was impacted, by how much in revenue hours? An estimate is fine.
Yes
No
Not sure
If yes, can you provide details on the practices or policies?
Thank you for your time!
Nelson\Nygaard has been retained by the Transportation Research Board/Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) to develop a framework for evaluating fare-free public transportation. The research will examine the benefits, costs, and tradeoffs that must be considered by public transit agencies, policymakers, and other stakeholders as they look towards full or partial elimination of fares. As part of this research, we are surveying transit agencies in two categories: (1) agencies that currently provide full or partial fare-free service and (2) agencies without existing fare-free service. This survey is directed to transit agencies in the second category. Although many transit agencies temporarily implemented fare-free service starting in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our research is only focusing on evaluating permanent fare-free service. If you have received the wrong survey, please contact our Principal Investigator, Cristina Barone, at cbarone@nelsonnygaard.com.
For the purposes of this research, we are defining partial fare-free transit agencies as those that:
The questions in this survey are designed to get an understanding of the factors that go into evaluation and implementation of fare free service. If you have the data available, we would appreciate information about ridership, on-time performance, service changes, capital investments, operating costs, fare collection costs, and transit agency revenues as they relate to fare-free transit at your agency. If detailed data is not available, estimates or opinions are sufficient. You are encouraged to collaborate with your transit agency colleagues to complete the survey. Individual names and titles will be anonymized prior to the publication of the framework, but survey responses may be associated with your transit agency.
Please complete and submit this survey by Friday, April 30th, 2021. If you have questions regarding this survey or the research project, please contact Cristina Barone at cbarone@nelsonnygaard.com. You may be contacted by Nelson\Nygaard after the survey is complete to help clarify your answers or obtain additional information.
Name of Transit Agency:
Respondent Name(s):
Respondent role(s):
Email Address(es):
Phone Number(s):
Yes
No
| Fully Fare-Free Service | Partial Fare-Free Service | |
|---|---|---|
| Not Considering | ||
| Considering | ||
| Studying | ||
| Implementing | ||
| Already Offer | ||
| Studied; Chose Not to Implement | ||
| Not Sure | ||
| If the transit agency is NOT considering, studying, or implementing full or partial fare free service in the future skip to Q. 42. | ||
All riders and services
Specific groups of riders
Specific services, modes, or routes
Not sure
What specific groups or services?
Not applicable
Yes
No
Not sure
If yes, what were the goals and objectives and how will fare-free service help the agency reach those goals?
Feasibility study
Fare-free pilot
Best practices and/or peer agency review
Other
Not sure Not applicable
Any details you would like to share?
Yes
No
Not sure
Yes
No
Not sure
Not applicable
If yes, what methods were used?
Very supportive
Supportive
Neutral
Not supportive
Very unsupportive
Any details you would like to share?
Yes
No
Not sure
Any details you would like to share?
Increase in ridership
No change in ridership
Decrease in ridership
Not sure
If ridership changed, by how much? An estimate is fine.
By drivers on paper
By drivers with tablets or other digital technology
At the farebox
Automatic Passenger Counters (APCs)
Manual ride checks on a sampling of trips
Other
Not sure
Not applicable
By drivers on paper
By drivers with tablets or other digital technology
Automatic Passenger Counters (APCs)
Manual ride checks on a sampling of trips
Other:
Improvement in on-time performance
No change in on-time performance
Deterioration in on-time performance
Not sure
Any details to share? Estimates are fine.
Increase service
Increase service unrelated to fare-free implementation
No significant change to service
Changes to service that did not require additional resources
Reduce service
Not sure
If the agency is making a change, by how much in revenue hours? An estimate is fine. If additional resources are not needed, can you provide more detail about the changes?
Yes, administrative employees
Yes, operations employees
Yes, maintenance employees
Yes, other employees
No
Not sure
If yes, how many staff members (full-time equivalents) do you have now and how many additional staff do you plan to hire? An estimate is fine.
Yes, additional fixed-route vehicles
Yes, additional paratransit vehicles
Yes, other additional vehicles
No
Not sure
If yes, how many additional vehicles (of each type)? An estimate is fine.
Yes
No
Not sure
If yes, which facilities and what is the approximate value?
Yes
No
Not sure
Year of evaluation:
Capital costs:
Operating costs:
Administrative costs:
Yes
No
Not sure
Any details you would like to share?
Increase in ridership
No change in ridership
Decrease in ridership
Not sure
By how much? An estimate is fine.
Increase in revenue hours
No change in revenue hours
Decrease in revenue hours
Not sure
By how much in revenue hours? An estimate is fine.
Yes
No
Not sure
If yes, can you provide details on the practices or policies?
Thank you for your time!
Yes, previously had fully fare-free service
Yes, previously partial fare-free service. For what groups and/or what services?
No
If so, why was fare-free service eliminated?
Agency depends on farebox revenues
We have not found a feasible revenue stream to replace fares
Policy restricts it (e.g., external farebox recovery mandates)
It would be politically infeasible
Would reduce the perceived value of transit
Would encourage people to abuse the system
Resulting increase in ridership would require additional service
Other
Any details you would like to share?
Thank you for your time!