
Aging in Place
with Dementia
______
Linda Casola, Rapporteur
Committee on Population
Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and
Sensory Sciences
Division of Behavioral and Social
Sciences and Education
Proceedings of a Workshop
NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
This activity was supported by a contract between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institute on Aging (HHSN263201800029I/75N98022F00008). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-71372-6
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-71372-2
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/27420
This publication is available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Copyright 2024 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and National Academies Press and the graphical logos for each are all trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Aging in Place with Dementia: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27420.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Rapid Expert Consultations published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are authored by subject-matter experts on narrowly focused topics that can be supported by a body of evidence. The discussions contained in rapid expert consultations are considered those of the authors and do not contain policy recommendations. Rapid expert consultations are reviewed by the institution before release.
For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.
EMILY M. AGREE (Chair), Research Professor and Associate Director of the Hopkins Population Center, Johns Hopkins University
JENNIFER AILSHIRE, Associate Professor of Gerontology and Sociology, Assistant Dean of Research, and Associate Dean of International Programs and Global Initiatives, University of Southern California
AMY J. H. KIND, Associate Dean for Social Health Sciences and Programs, University of Wisconsin–Madison
JENNIFER J. MANLY, Professor of Neuropsychology, Columbia University
WENDY A. ROGERS, Khan Professor of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
SARAH L. SZANTON, Dean and Patricia M. Davidson Health Equity and Social Justice Endowed Professor, Johns Hopkins University
WILLIAM A. VEGA, Distinguished Professor and Senior Scholar for Community Health, Florida International University
MICHAEL SIRI, Project Director
KEVONA JONES, Senior Program Assistant
MALAY K. MAJMUNDAR, Director, Committee on Population
ANNE R. PEBLEY (Chair), University of California, Los Angeles
EMILY M. AGREE, Johns Hopkins University
RANDALL Q.K. AKEE, University of California, Los Angeles
DEBORAH BALK, Baruch College of the City University of New York
COURTNEY C. COILE, Wellesley College
SONALDE DESAI, University of Maryland
KATHARINE M. DONATO, Georgetown University
ROBERT A. HUMMER, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
SEEMA JAYACHANDRAN, Princeton University
HEDWIG (HEDY) LEE, Duke University
TREVON LOGAN, The Ohio State University
JENNIFER J. MANLY, Columbia University
JENNA NOBLES, University of Wisconsin–Madison
FERNANDO RIOSMENA, The University of Texas at San Antonio
DAVID T. TAKEUCHI, University of Washington
MALAY K. MAJMUNDAR, Director
TERRIE E. MOFFITT (Chair), Duke University
RICHARD N. ASLIN, Haskins Laboratories
WILSON S. GEISLER, University of Texas at Austin
MICHELE J. GELFAND, Stanford Graduate School of Business
MARA MATHER, University of Southern California
ULRICH MAYR, University of Oregon
KATHERINE L. MILKMAN, University of Pennsylvania
DON OPERARIO, Emory University
ELIZABETH A. PHELPS, Harvard University
DAVID E. POEPPEL, New York University
KARL W. REID, Northeastern University
STACEY SINCLAIR, Princeton University
MO WANG, University of Florida
DUANE WATSON, Vanderbilt University
DANIEL J. WEISS, Director
This page intentionally left blank.
This Proceedings of a Workshop was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published proceedings as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the process.
We thank the following individual for their review of this proceedings:
LAURA N. GITLIN, Drexel University
Although the reviewer listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the proceedings nor did they see the final draft before its release. We also thank staff member TRACY LUSTIG for reading and providing helpful comments on this manuscript.
The review of this proceedings was overseen by JACQUI SMITH, University of Michigan. She was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this proceedings was carried out in accordance with standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the rapporteur and the National Academies.
This page intentionally left blank.
Funding for the workshop was provided by the Division of Behavioral and Social Research of the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and NIA staff provided substantial input to the workshop. The planning committee thanks Elena Fazio, Nicole Kidwiler, Jessica Boten, and Priscilla Novak at NIA for being generous with their time and attention in answering the committee’s questions and providing vital information to develop the scope and content of the workshop.
The planning committee is grateful to all the speakers for sharing their experiences and knowledge by providing high-quality and relevant presentations for this workshop. A video playlist of the workshop as well as links to all presentations can be found at: https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/40481_09-2023_aging-in-place-with-dementia-a-workshop. Finally, the workshop and proceedings would not be possible without help from knowledgeable and talented National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine staff, who provided guidance, shared best practices, and assisted in navigating institutional processes and procedures.
This proceedings was prepared by the workshop rapporteur as a factual summary of what occurred at the workshop. The planning committee’s role was limited to planning and convening the workshop. The views contained in the proceedings are those of individual participants and do not necessarily represent the views of all workshop participants, the planning committee, NIA, or the National Academies.
This page intentionally left blank.
ORGANIZATION OF THIS PROCEEDINGS
2 Frameworks for Aging in Place
THEORIES OF PLACE AND AGING: AN ENVIRONMENTAL GERONTOLOGY PERSPECTIVE
STRUCTURAL DETERMINANTS OF AGING IN A PLACE: A STORY
FRAMEWORKS FOR AGE- AND DEMENTIA-FRIENDLY COMMUNITY INITIATIVES
3 Community-Level Built Environments and Infrastructure
COGNABILITY: AN ECOLOGICAL THEORY OF NEIGHBORHOODS AND COGNITIVE AGING
DRIVING AND AGING IN PLACE: EMOTIONS, MOBILITY, AND TECHNOLOGY
AGING IN PLACE WITH DEMENTIA-FRIENDLY HOUSING
4 Evaluating Successful Programs
AN INTERVENTIONIST’S PERSPECTIVE
EVALUATION: TOWARD A VALUE PROPOSITION
5 Social Services and Other Supports
PAID CARE AND FAMILY CAREGIVERS
LOS ANGELES COUNTY AGING AND DISABILITIES DEPARTMENT
6 Social Isolation and Engagement
TECHNOLOGY TO SUPPORT SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT
SOCIAL ISOLATION AND SURROGATE DECISION MAKING
7 Research Implications of Community-Based Interventions and Policies
HOME- AND COMMUNITY-BASED PROGRAMS
TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE
AN ASSET-BASED APPROACH TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Appendix B Biographical Sketches for Workshop Planning Committee Members and Speakers
2-1 The impact of structural determinants on social determinants of health
4-1 A socio-ecological model to guide dementia care interventions
6-1 A framework of social engagement
6-2 Decision-making capacity trajectory for older adults with dementia