Assessing Genomic Sequencing Information for Health Care
Decision Making: A Workshop
February 3, 2014
The Keck Center of the National Academies, Room 100
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
MEETING OBJECTIVES
AGENDA
|
8:30–8:35 a.m. |
Welcoming Remarks |
|
Sharon F. Terry, Roundtable Co-Chair |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Genetic Alliance |
|
|
Geoffrey Ginsburg, Roundtable Co-Chair |
|
|
Director, Genomic Medicine, Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy |
|
|
Executive Director, Center for Personalized Medicine, Duke Medicine |
|
|
Professor of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center |
|
|
8:35–8:45 a.m. |
Charge to Workshop Speakers and Participants |
|
David Veenstra |
|
|
Professor, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program |
|
|
University of Washington |
SESSION I: HOW EVIDENCE IS GATHERED AND ASSESSED/GRADED/EVALUATED
Moderator: Debra Leonard, University of Vermont
|
8:45–10:15 a.m. |
Systematic Evidence Gathering and Actionability Determination |
|
• What process do you use to identify studies and data? |
|
|
• How are you selecting tests/variants for full evidence review and assessment? |
|
|
• How do you critically assess the data and synthesize for conclusion? |
|
|
• How do you present the results of the evidence review and evaluation to policy makers? |
|
• How do you determine if clinical action is recommended or taken for specific genomic variants? |
|
|
• How do you define actionability? |
|
|
• What are the challenges you have encountered? |
|
|
• What have you done to overcome these challenges? |
|
|
Jonathan Berg |
|
|
Assistant Professor |
|
|
Department of Genetics |
|
|
University of North Carolina School of Medicine |
|
|
Katrina Goddard |
|
|
Senior Investigator |
|
|
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research |
|
|
Shashikant Kulkarni |
|
|
Director of Cytogenomics and Molecular Pathology |
|
|
Genomics and Pathology Services |
|
|
Washington University School of Medicine |
|
|
Heidi Rehm |
|
|
Associate Professor of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School |
|
|
Director, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine |
|
|
Partners Healthcare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine |
|
|
Madhuri Hegde |
|
|
Executive Director, Emory Genetics Laboratory |
|
|
Professor, Department of Human Genetics |
|
|
Emory University School of Medicine |
|
Mark Robson |
|
|
Clinic Director, Clinical Genetics Service |
|
|
Department of Human Genetics |
|
|
Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center |
|
|
10:15–10:30 a.m. |
BREAK |
|
10:30–11:30 a.m. |
Discussion with Speakers and Attendees |
|
11:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m. |
WORKING LUNCH |
SESSION II: PROCESS FOR DECISION MAKING ONCE EVIDENCE IS ASSESSED/GRADED/EVALUATED
Moderator: Bruce Blumberg, Kaiser Permanente
|
12:30–1:00 p.m. |
Reimbursement Decisions |
|
• Under what process (existing or novel) would genome or multi-gene panel sequencing be evaluated? Describe the process. |
|
|
• What are your criteria for coverage? |
|
|
• Does the extent to which information is reported in the electronic health record affect your decision? |
|
|
• Under what circumstances are high-throughput sequencing tests covered by payers? |
|
|
Robert McDonough |
|
|
Head of Clinical Policy and Research Aetna |
|
|
Louis Jacques |
|
|
Director, Coverage and Analysis Group |
|
|
Office of Clinical Standards and Quality |
|
|
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services |
|
|
1:00–1:35 p.m. |
Discussion with Speakers and Attendees |
Moderator: Muin Khoury, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
|
1:35–2:20 p.m. |
Guideline Development |
|
• How are you applying your guideline development process to next-generation sequencing? |
|
|
• What do you think are the top three challenges to developing guidelines in the era of next-generation sequencing? |
|
|
• Do you consider the Institute of Medicine recommendations for developing clinical practice guidelines in your process? |
|
|
Robert C. Green |
|
|
Director, Genomes to People (G2P) Research Program |
|
|
Associate Director for Research, Partners Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine |
|
|
Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine |
|
|
Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School |
|
|
Howard M. Saal |
|
|
Director, Clinical Genetics |
|
|
Division of Human Genetics |
|
|
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center |
|
|
Gary Lyman |
|
|
Co-Director, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research |
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center |
|
|
University of Washington |
|
|
2:20–2:55 p.m. |
Discussion with Speakers and Attendees |
|
2:55–3:10 p.m. |
BREAK |
Moderator: W. Gregory Feero, Maine Dartmouth Family Medicine
|
3:10–4:10 p.m. |
Patient Care and Health Decisions |
|
• Upon what evidence is the decision made to use large-scale sequencing over a more targeted approach? |
|
|
• Does reimbursement play a role in ordering a whole genome test? |
|
|
• How do you see the role of patient preferences in what testing is done and what information is disclosed? |
|
|
• How well do patients understand discussions about genomic testing? And, what is the patient response to reports of incidental findings? |
|
|
Kathleen Hickey |
|
|
Assistant Professor of Nursing |
|
|
Columbia University School of Nursing |
|
|
Jessica Everett |
|
|
Clinical Instructor, Internal Medicine |
|
|
Certified Genetic Counselor |
|
|
Cancer Genetics Clinic |
|
|
University of Michigan |
|
|
Amy Hower |
|
|
Neuroscientist and Patient |
|
|
Michael Gambello |
|
|
Associate Professor of Human Genetics and Pediatrics |
|
|
Section Chief, Division of Medical Genetics |
|
|
Emory University School of Medicine |
|
|
4:10–4:45 p.m. |
Discussion with Speakers and Attendees |
SESSION III: NEXT STEPS AND ADDRESSING CHALLENGES
Moderator: David Veenstra, University of Washington
|
4:45–5:30 p.m. |
Developing Transparent and Pragmatic Frameworks for Evidence Evaluation and Policy Development in the Absence of an Ideal Evidence Base |
|
• What are the top three challenges to developing clinical and reimbursement policies in the era of genomic testing? |
|
|
• What approaches do you think can help address these challenges? |
|
|
• To what extent does clinical context matter? |
|
|
• How do risk–benefit tradeoffs influence evidentiary requirements? |
|
|
Jonathan Berg |
|
|
Assistant Professor |
|
|
Department of Genetics |
|
|
University of North Carolina School of Medicine |
|
|
Jessica Everett |
|
|
Clinical Instructor, Internal Medicine |
|
|
Certified Genetic Counselor |
|
|
Cancer Genetics Clinic |
|
|
University of Michigan |
|
|
Katrina Goddard |
|
|
Senior Investigator |
|
|
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research |
|
|
Robert C. Green |
|
|
Director, Genomes to People (G2P) Research Program |
|
|
Associate Director for Research |
|
|
Partners Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine |
|
|
Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine |
|
Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School |
|
|
Shashikant Kulkarni |
|
|
Director of Cytogenomics and Molecular Pathology |
|
|
Genomics and Pathology Services |
|
|
Washington University School of Medicine |
|
|
Robert McDonough |
|
|
Head of Clinical Policy and Research |
|
|
Aetna |
|
|
5:30–5:45 p.m. |
Summary and Concluding Remarks |
|
5:45 p.m. |
ADJOURN |