Completed
Topics
This two-day public workshop will focus on how to best support students in post-secondary mathematics courses, with particular attention to students who are unsuccessful in developmental mathematics. The workshop will bring together a variety of stakeholders, including experts who have implemented new initiatives designed to improve the mathematics education experience for students. During sessions at the workshop, participants will: (1) explore promising approaches to bolster student outcomes in mathematics, (2) identify and discuss barriers and opportunities for effectively serving all students, and (3) establish key directions to address the prevailing research and data needs in the field.
Featured publication
Workshop
·2019
The Board on Science Education and the Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened the Workshop on Increasing Student Success in Developmental Mathematics on March 18-19, 2019. The Workshop explored how to best support all st...
View details
Description
A planning committee will plan a 2-day, open workshop that will explore the effectiveness of post-secondary developmental (remedial) mathematics courses with particular attention to the students who are unsuccessful in these courses. The workshop will explore the challenges these students face, promising approaches and areas where additional research is needed. The workshop will focus on the following questions:
1. Which students are well-served by current offerings in developmental mathematics? How do we define “well-served” and what are indicators of student success in developmental mathematics? How do we define which students are included here?
2. What is the size of the total population that is not well served? Are there subgroups within this group and how do needs or challenges vary across them? How do Adult Basic Education students fit in?
3. What is known about why some students are not well-served? What do we need to know in order to better serve them?
4. Are there examples of successful approaches? What are the components of these programs (considering interventions both within and outside of the classroom)? What is needed in order to implement the more successful approaches?
5. What are the potential challenges and what strategies can be used to address them? What are the next steps?
6. What are the gaps in the research base and what are the key directions for research, both short and long-term?
After the workshop, proceedings of a workshop of the presentations and discussions at the workshop will be prepared by a designated rapporteur in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Contributors
Sponsors
Ascendium Education Group
Staff
Tiffany E. Taylor
Lead
Kerry Brenner
Matthew Lammers
Jessica Covington
Michelle Schwalbe
Heidi Schweingruber
Major units and sub-units
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
Lead
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Lead
Center for Advancing Science and Technology
Lead
Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics
Lead
Science and Engineering Education and Workforce Program Area
Lead
Board on Science Education
Lead