Previous Chapter: E Committee and Staff Biographies
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

Index

A

Academic research, see Professional education;

Universities and colleges

Accountability, general, 1, 39

self-assessment, 10, 73

Accreditation, institutional, 13, 30, 56, 66, 79, 80-82, 112, 113-122, 131-132

animal research, 81-82, 121

Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 80, 119

human subjects, 81-82, 121

public opinion, 115, 119

Quality Improvement Program, 77

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 117

Administrative Procedures Act, 168, 173

Administrators and administration, 4, 10, 46

cost factors, 10-11, 119-120, 129

education of, 86-87

funding, 23, 119-120, 129

regulatory compliance, 74

self-assessment, 79, 116, 121

American Association for the Advancement of Science, 21, 106, 187-188

Animal research, 5, 35, 39, 43, 89

accreditation, institutions, 81-82, 121

open systems model, 54, 65

ORI core content areas, 22

Animal Welfare Act, 39

Army, see U.S. Army

Association of American Medical Colleges, 21

Association of American Universities, 44

Associations, see Professional organizations

Attitudes and beliefs, 16-17, 116

see also Individual scientists;

Public opinion

educators, 98, 116

individual scientists, 16-17, 62, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90-92, 94-96, 130

Authorship, 36, 40

Award for Excellence in Human Research Protection, 77

Awards, see Reward systems

B

Benchmarks, 75-77, 78-79, 81, 112

Biomedical research, 17-18, 20, 25, 158-161

see also Animal research;

Human subjects

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

awards, 77

licensure, 118

open systems model, 50

performance-based systems, 77, 78

privacy, 25, 67

C

Canter’s Dilemma, 95

Case analyses, 90, 91, 92-93, 151-152

Center for Academic Integrity, 148-149

Colleges, see Universities and colleges

Collegiality, 5, 35, 36, 37-38, 39, 61-62

see also Peer review

Committee biographies, 184-185, 188-194

Competition, 16, 25, 37, 38, 42, 53, 57, 58

Computer technology, 25

see also Databases

computer-based instruction, 103-104, 151

Internet, 21, 105, 125, 138, 170

Conflicts of interest, 5, 25, 35, 37, 38, 43-44, 55, 92-93

Continuing education, 27, 40, 41, 85, 86-87

Copyright, see Intellectual property

Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 80, 119

Cultural issues, 1, 4-5, 6, 22, 25, 33, 56, 94-95, 112, 120

see also Institutional factors;

Political factors;

Public opinion

definitional, 30, 87-89

institutional integrity, 34, 46-47, 60, 72, 78, 115, 116-117, 120, 143, 144-150, 161-162, 163

open systems model, 7, 49-71

religious, 38

D

Databases, 13-14, 20, 132

committee report at hand, methodology, 135-136

Internet, 21, 105, 125

Data issues, 116, 125

see also Intellectual property;

Journals;

Reporting requirements

open systems model, 59-60

ORI core content areas, 22, 23

privacy, 25, 67

Decision-making practices, 3, 9, 10, 23, 26, 42, 43, 54, 56, 62-63, 84, 89

authorship, 36, 40

conflicts of interest, 5, 25, 35, 37, 38, 43-44, 55, 92-93

problem solving, 9, 20, 41, 53, 62, 63, 89-93, 98, 99

Defining Issues Test, 91-92, 154-159, 160

Definitional issues, 1, 2, 16, 27, 30, 86, 87, 130, 146, 151-159

cultural issues, 30, 87-89

decision making, 62-63

ethical sensitivity, 86, 87, 88, 89, 151-152

institutional factors, 4, 30

mentor, 40

professional education, 30

research environment, 2, 18, 29

research integrity, 2, 4, 18, 27, 29, 34, 62, 115

research misconduct, 170-172, 175

Dental Practice Act, 160

Department of Education, 119, 150

Department of Energy, 139

Department of Health and Human Services, 18-20, 168-176

see also Office of Research Integrity

Award for Excellence in Human Research Protection, 77

committee charge, 2, 3, 18, 124

Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 73

Public Health Service, 20, 45, 169, 173, 174, 175

E

Economic factors, 8, 10-11, 20, 94, 179

see also Funding;

Reward systems

academic research, 25

accreditation, institutional, 116

administrative costs, 10-11, 119-120, 129

computer-based instruction, 103-104

conflicts of interest, 5, 25, 35, 37, 38, 43-44, 55, 92-93

mentor/trainee relations, 42-43

open systems model, 63, 64, 65-66

self-assessment, 80-81, 113

Education, 1, 3, 4

see also Mentor/trainee relations;

Professional education;

Universities and colleges

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

Essays, 20, 95, 153

Ethnic groups, see Racial factors

Expert opinion, 11, 34, 98, 126, 158-159

see also Leadership;

Peer review

committee charge and methodology, 3, 139, 140-142

regulatory compliance, 74

F

Federal government, 12, 14, 22-23, 29, 77, 118-120, 122, 128, 129, 167-177

see also Department of Health and Human Services;

Funding;

Legislation;

Regulatory issues

Department of Education, 119, 150

Department of Energy, 139

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 23

National Institute of Nursing Research, 20

National Institute of Standards and Technology , 77-78

National Institutes of Health, 75, 84, 168, 170-171, 173, 174

National Science and Technology Council, 171-172

National Science Foundation, 23, 24, 145, 171

Office of Government Ethics, 148

Office of Science and Technology, 171

Office of Scientific Integrity, 168, 174

Office of Scientific Integrity Review, 168, 174

U.S. Army, 149-150

Foreign countries, see International influences

Foundations, 21, 65, 77, 119, 122, 128, 129, 131

National Science Foundation, 23, 24, 145, 171

Four-Component Model of Morality, 87, 88, 94, 150-151

Funding, 12, 20, 23-24, 45, 106, 127-129, 132, 138-139, 168, 173

administrators and administration, 23, 119-120, 129

foundations, 21, 65, 77, 119, 122, 128, 129, 131

National Science Foundation, 23, 24, 145, 171

grantsmanship, 10, 19, 105, 119-120, 179

institutional self-assessment, 73, 118-120, 122

open systems model, 53, 63, 64, 65

G

Gender factors, 89, 100, 151, 152, 161

Good Practice in Biomedical Research, 21

Government Performance and Results Act, 77

Government role, see Department of Health and Human Services;

Federal government;

Funding;

Legal issues;

Legislation;

Regulatory issues

Grantsmanship, 10, 19, 105, 119-120

bibliographic resource list, 179

H

Health Care Compliance Association, 139

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 67

Health sciences, see Biomedical research

Historical perspectives, 20-21, 167-177

accreditation, institutional, 80

awards, 24

committee study, 2, 18-20

reform movements, 27-28

Honor in Science, 95

Human subjects, 5, 35, 38-39, 43, 89, 104

accreditation, institutional, 81-82, 121

Award for Excellence in Human Research Protection, 77

informed consent, 38-39

open systems model, 54, 65, 67

I

Identity formation, 94, 95-96, 159-161

Incentives, see Reward systems

Individual scientists, 1, 3, 4-5, 14-15, 26, 33, 34-41, 90-91, 112, 120-121, 132, 146-147, 163

attitudes of, 16-17, 62, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90-92, 94-96, 130

conflicts of interest, 5, 25, 35, 37, 38, 43-44, 55, 92-93

Defining Issues Test, 91-92, 154-159, 160

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

developmental differences/individual learning, 100

identity formation, 94, 95-96, 159-161

institutional factors, 4-5, 25-27, 39, 56, 144, 145-147

outcome measures, 143-144

self-efficacy abilities, 96-97

self-regulation abilities, 96-97

Inova Institute of Research and Education, 139

Institutional factors, 1, 5-8, 12-14, 22, 27-28, 35, 41-47, 72-83, 126-127, 128-129, 161-162

see also Accreditation, institutional;

Administrators and administration;

Education;

Leadership;

Mentor/trainee relations;

Professional education;

Universities and colleges

animal research, 22, 54, 81-82, 121

committee methodology, 2, 6, 29, 143

conflicts of interest, 43-44, 55

culture of integrity, 34, 46-47, 60, 72, 78, 115, 116-117, 120, 143, 144-150, 161-162, 163

definitional issues, 4, 30

human subjects, 39, 54, 81-82, 121

individual scientists, 4-5, 25-27, 39, 56, 144, 145-147

investigations and inspections, 35, 41, 45, 54, 73-74, 79, 168

ombudspersons, 4-5, 42, 43

open systems model, 7, 49-68

organizational learning, 72, 73

outcome measures, 22, 143-144

performance-based assessment, 10, 73, 75-79

public opinion, 16

self-assessment, 10, 11, 13, 73, 78, 112, 113-122, 124, 130-132

support systems, 42

Intellectual property, 25, 37, 171, 172

authorship, 36, 40

collegiality, 5, 35, 36, 37-38, 39, 61-62

ORI guidelines, 22

International influences, open systems model, 54

Internet, 21, 105, 125, 138, 170

Investigations and inspections, 35, 41, 45, 73-74, 79, 168

open systems model, 54

J

Journals, 38, 63, 64, 66, 85, 101, 105

see also Literature reviews

L

Leadership, 14, 35-36, 41, 57-58, 101, 122, 129, 132

see also Administrators and administration;

Mentor/trainee relations

awards, 78

ombudspersons, 4-5, 42, 43

performance-based systems, 76, 78

Legal issues, 4, 67

see also Intellectual property;

Regulatory issues

conflicts of interest, 5, 25, 35, 37, 38, 43-44, 55, 92-93

human subjects, informed consent, 38-39

litigation, 67, 168-169, 175

privacy, 25, 67

sanctions, 35, 41, 59-60, 67, 76

Legislation, 86, 130

Administrative Procedures Act, 168, 173

Animal Welfare Act, 39

Dental Practice Act, 160

Government Performance and Results Act, 77

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 67

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Improvement Act, 77-78

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act, 170

Licensing, 25, 37, 80, 118

Literature reviews, 85, 135-142

bibliographic resources, 178-183

committee methodology, 6, 49, 135-142

M

Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award, 77-78

Mass media, 2-3, 18

Medical Device Manufacturers Association, 139

Medical Ethics Inventory, 160

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

Medical research, see Biomedical research

Men, see Gender factors

Mentor/trainee relations, 5, 9-10, 22, 26-27, 35, 38, 40, 42-43, 59, 85, 86, 99-101, 107

bibliographic resource list, 178-179, 180

ORI core content areas, 22

performance-based assessment, 76

Methodological issues, general, 1, 3, 11, 14, 16, 122, 126, 131, 150-162

see also Definitional issues;

Literature reviews;

Models and modeling;

Outcome measures

collegiality, 37

committee biographies, 184-194

committee report at hand, methodology of, 2-3, 6, 17, 18, 28-31, 135-142

lacking, 3, 124, 126

multidisciplinary approaches, 102, 104, 128

professional education, 95-97

theory, 3, 6, 9, 49, 68, 98, 103, 125

Middle States Commission on Higher Education, 79, 80-81

Minority groups, see Racial factors

Models and modeling, 8, 10, 14, 73, 97, 125, 143, 174

Four-Component Model of Morality, 87, 88, 94, 150-151

open systems, 7, 49-71

Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment, 92, 93

Multidisciplinary approaches, 102, 104, 128

N

National Center for Education Statistics, 150

National Council of Examinations for Engineers and Surveyors, 80

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 23

National Institute of Nursing Research, 20

National Institute of Standards and Technology, 77-78

National Institutes of Health, 75, 84, 168, 170-171, 173, 174

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act, 170

National Performance Review, 77

National Research Service Awards, 84

National Science and Technology Council, 171-172

National Science Foundation, 23, 24, 145, 171

O

Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 73

Office of Government Ethics, 148

Office of Research Integrity (ORI), 13-14, 21-22, 118, 146, 167-176 (passim)

committee charge/methodology, 2, 18, 19, 135, 138-139

databases, 20, 132

funding, 12, 23, 24, 125, 128

Quality Improvement Program, 77

Office of Science and Technology, 171

Office of Scientific Integrity, 168, 174

Office of Scientific Integrity Review, 168, 174

Ombudspersons, 4-5, 42, 43

On Being a Scientist, 33, 95

Open systems model, 7, 49-71

animal research, 54, 65

cultural issues, 7, 49-71

data issues, 59-60

economic factors, general, 63, 64, 65-66

funding, 53, 63, 64, 65

human subjects, 54, 65, 67

outcome measures, 52, 61-63

professional education, 53, 55, 63, 67

professional organizations, 66-67

regulatory issues, codes of conduct, 54-55, 58-59, 61, 66

regulatory issues, other, 53, 63, 64, 65

Organizational factors, see Institutional factors

ORI, see Office of Research Integrity

Outcome measures, 2, 11, 14, 28, 29, 114, 143-166 (passim)

see also Standards

benchmarks, 75-77, 78-79, 81, 112

individual scientists, 143-144

institutions, 22, 143-144

open systems model, 52, 61-63

professional education, 22, 114, 131-132

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

P

Patents, see Intellectual property

Peer education, 55, 100, 103

Peer review, 5, 35, 37, 73, 79-81, 112, 113, 116, 119, 130-131

see also Collegiality;

Self-assessment

ORI core content areas, 21-22

Penalties, see Sanctions

Performance-based assessment, 10, 73, 75-79, 112, 151-152

see also Reward systems

benchmarks, 75-77, 78-79, 81, 112

institutions, 10, 73, 75-79

Plagarism, see Intellectual property

Political factors, 8, 33, 124, 156, 168

see also Public opinion

individual scientists’ beliefs, 38

Portfolio assessment, 77

Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions, 92, 141

Problem solving, 9, 20, 41, 53, 62, 63, 89-93, 98, 99

Professional Decisions and Values Test, 160-161

Professional education, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9-10, 12-13, 14, 20-21, 28, 30, 33, 35, 45-46, 84-111, 112, 124, 128, 129-132, 142-143, 148-149

see also Mentor/trainee relations;

Universities and colleges

administrators, 86-87

attitudes of educators, 98, 116

bibliographic resources on teaching, 183

case analyses, 90, 91, 92-93, 151-152

committee biographies, 184-194

computer-based instruction, 103-104

defined, 30

Defining Issues Test (DIT), 91-92, 154-159

essays, 20, 95, 153

multidisciplinary approaches, 102, 104, 128

open systems model, 53, 55, 63, 67

ORI core content areas, 21-22, 104-105

outcome measures, 22, 114, 131-132

peer education, 55, 100, 103

portfolio assessment, 77

principles of adult learning, 98-100

self-assessment, 79, 80-81, 113-120

textbooks, 106

time factors, 98-99, 105

continuing education, 27, 40, 41, 85, 86-87

full-semester courses, 103

reaccreditation, 113-114

short courses, 102

single workshops, 103

workshops, 61, 97, 103, 105, 106

Professional organizations, 21, 120

American Association for the Advancement of Science, 21, 106, 187-188

Association of American Medical Colleges, 21

Association of American Universities, 44

Center for Academic Integrity, 148-149

committee biographies, 184-194

committee charge/methodology, 2, 138

Medical Device Manufacturers Association, 139

National Council of Examinations for Engineers and Surveyors, 80

open systems model, 66-67

Society for Neuroscience, 106

Professional Role Orientation Inventory, 159-160

Public Health Service, 20, 45, 169, 173, 174, 175

Public opinion, 1, 3, 4, 16, 33, 130

accreditation, institutions, 115, 119

committee charge, 2-3, 18, 29, 124

mass media, 2-3, 18

Q

Quality Improvement Program, 77

R

Racial Ethical Sensitivity Test, 90, 151

Racial factors, 89, 90, 100, 151, 152

Regulatory issues, 6, 27, 33-34, 36, 42, 45, 73-75, 81, 86, 112, 130

see also Accreditation, institutional;

Investigations and inspections;

Sanctions;

Standards

administrators, 74

committee methodology, 2

expert opinion, 74

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

investigations and inspections, 35, 41, 45, 54, 73-74, 79, 168

licensing, 25, 37, 80, 118

occupational health and safety, 73, 89

open systems model, codes of conduct, 54-55, 58-59, 61, 66

open systems model, other, 53, 63, 64, 65

reporting requirements, 73-75

sanctions, 35, 41, 59-60, 67, 76

self-assessment and, 10-11, 73

Religious issues, 38

Reporting requirements, 5, 34, 36, 37, 79, 107, 171, 172

bibliographic resources on writing, 183

journals, 38, 63, 64, 66, 85, 101, 105

mentoring, 40

regulatory compliance, 73-75

The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, 20, 167-177

Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, 19, 20-21, 22-23, 140

Reviews of the literature, see Literature reviews

Reward systems, 20-21, 24, 76, 112, 127, 175

Award for Excellence in Human Research Protection, 77

Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award, 77-78

National Research Service Awards, 84

S

Sanctions, 35, 41, 59-60, 67, 76

The Scientific Attitude, 95

Scientific Research Society, 21

Self-assessment, 3, 10-11, 78, 79-82, 112-123

see also Peer review

accountability, general, 10, 73

administrators, 79, 116, 121

economic factors, general, 80-81, 113

funding, 73, 118-120, 122

institutions, 10, 11, 13, 73, 78, 112, 113-122, 124, 130-132

professional education, 79, 80-81, 113-120

regulatory issues, 10-11, 73

standards, 79, 80

technology, 79

Self-efficacy abilities, 96-97

Self-regulation abilities, 96-97

Sex differences, see Gender factors

Sigma Xi, see Scientific Research Society

Social factors, see Cultural issues;

Institutional factors;

Mentor/ trainee relations;

Political factors;

Public opinion

Society for Neuroscience, 106

Standards, 24, 33, 34, 58, 73, 81, 84, 115, 169-170, 174-175, 176

see also Accreditation, institutional;

Outcome measures;

Performance-based assessment

benchmarks, 75-77, 78-79, 81, 112

codes of conduct, 54-55, 58-59, 61, 66, 95, 120, 127, 138

identity formation, 94

licensing, 25, 37, 80, 118

open systems model, codes of conduct, 54-55, 58-59, 61, 66

self-assessment, 79, 80

T

Technology

computer-based instruction, 103-104, 151

computer technology, general, 25

inadequate, 17

Internet, 21, 105, 125, 138, 170

open systems model, 54, 57, 67

public opinion, 1, 16

self-assessment, 79

Textbooks, 106

Theoretical issues, 3, 6, 9, 49, 68, 98, 103, 125

see also Models and modeling

U

Universities and colleges, 25, 27, 39-40, 81-82, 84-111, 116-117, 120-122, 148-149

committee biographies, 184-194

conflicts of interest, 38, 43-44

open systems model, 50, 55

regulatory compliance, 74

U.S. Army, 149-150

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.

V

Varmus, Harold, 17

Videotapes, 90, 151-152, 188

W

Wellcome Trust, 21

Women, see Gender factors

Workshops, 61, 97, 103, 105, 106

World Wide Web, see Internet

Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 195
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 196
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 197
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 198
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 199
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 200
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 201
Suggested Citation: "Index." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10430.
Page 202
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.