OSTP requested NOAA and NASA to provide:
An analysis of possible mitigation options of the climate impacts of the NPOESS Nunn-McCurdy Certification through 2026
An assessment of the potential costs of these options
Primary goal: Ensure continuity of long-term climate records
NOAA and NASA analyzed the following options:
Remanifesting the climate sensors on NPOESS spacecraft
Placing sensors on currently planned non-NPOESS spacecraft
Developing new gap-filling climate satellite missions
Partnering opportunities
Key results:
Work in progress: still assessing options
Multiple options exist to mitigate the loss of sensors from NPOESS
Options consistent with Decadal Survey recommendations
Partnering for altimetry could provide significant cost savings
NOTE: B. Cramer, NASA Headquarters, “Mitigation Approaches to Address Impacts of NPOESS Nunn-McCurdy Certification on Joint NASA-NOAA Climate Goals. Joint NASA-NOAA Draft Study for OSTP (Phase II),” presentation to the Options to Ensure the Climate Record from the NPOESS and GOES-R Spacecraft Workshop, June 19, 2007, available at http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ssb/SSB_NPOESS2007_Presentations.html. The presentation as delivered at the workshop has been reformatted somewhat for publication. Page numbers in brackets refer to the original presentation. All information presented is pre-decisional, and assessments involve preliminary rough-order-of-magnitude cost estimates only.
Total Solar Irradiance Sensor (TSIS)
Essential to discriminate between natural and anthropogenic causes of climate change
Would continue 25+ year long data record
Earth Radiation Budget Sensor (ERBS)
Continuously monitors the Earth’s radiation budget to identify subtle long-term shifts related to climate change
Would continue 21+ year long data record
Ocean Altimeter (ALT)
Monitors sea level
Would continue 15+ year long data record
Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) – Limb Subsystem
Measures the vertical distribution of stratospheric ozone to monitor and understand the ozone recovery resulting from the Montreal Protocol
Would continue 23+ year long data record
Aerosol Polarimetry Sensor (APS)
Measures the global distribution of aerosols and their impact on the Earth’s energy balance, clouds, and precipitation
Conical Scanning Microwave Imager (CMIS) – Reduced Capability
Provides sea surface temperatures, sea ice and snow cover extents, soil moisture, ocean surface wind speed, water vapor, and precipitation rates even in the presence of heavy cloud cover
Continuous records date back to 1987
Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) – Reduced Coverage (Absent from 0930 Orbit)
Multi-spectral imagers sample the spectral signatures of features on or near the Earth’s surface important to climate science
For over three decades, scientists have depended on this imagery for a wide variety of weather and climate applications
Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS)/Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) – Reduced Coverage (Absent from 0530 Orbit)
No mitigation recommended for climate science
Space Environment Sensor Suite (SESS)
Not considered here
Multiple options exist to mitigate the loss of sensors from NPOESS
Developed options using following criteria:
Minimize risk to measurement continuity
First priority for existing climate data records
Minimize risk to existing programs
Cost effectiveness
Economies of scale
Leverage planned missions and sensors including partnerships with other space agencies
Option 1: NPOESS + Gap Filler Climate Satellite
Option 2: Sequential Climate Satellites
Option 3: Sequential Climate Satellites w/TSIS Redundancy
Option 4: Sequential Climate Satellites w/TSIS Redundancy & Operational Risk Reduction
These options also include free-flyer altimetry missions and climate data record science support
FIGURE [C.1] Range of Options Examined for Climate Data Continuity. [p. 7]
FIGURE [C.2] Initial Recommendation from January 2007 Joint Assessment. [p. 8]
NOTES:
• VIIRS flies on NPP, C1, C2, C3, and C4
• AVHRR flies on METOP mid-morning orbit
• CMIS to be replaced by MIS starting with C2
FIGURE [C.3] Option 1. NPOESS + Climate Satellite. [p. 9]
NOTES:
• The manifest for C1 is frozen based on technical risk considerations
• VIIRS flies on NPP, C1, C2, C3, and C4
• AVHRR flies on METOP mid-morning orbit
• CMIS to be replaced by MIS starting with C2
FIGURE [C.8] Option 3 and 4. Continuity Timeline. Sequential Climate Satellites + TSIS Redundancy. [p. 14]
Work in progress: still exploring options
NPOESS remanifest
Assessed 2 options for earliest return to NPOESS flights (C2-C4)
NASA procures and delivers sensors to NPOESS as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)
The Integrated Program Office (IPO) procures sensors via current prime contractor overseeing subcontracted instrument vendors
Altimetry
Altimetry capability explored as free-flying Jason follow-on and as advanced altimeter missions
Climate satellite missions
Examined 2 research-grade missions
Additionally explored TSIS (total and spectral) on Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) and International Space Station (ISS)
Currently assessing CERES on NPP
Examined 2 operational-grade missions
Used sensor analysis from NASA plus spacecraft development analysis from NOAA Polar Extended Mission study (2006)
Includes development, production, reprocessing, stewardship, and distribution
Assumes data from all NPOESS certified sensors and mitigation sensors / sources
Covers about 30 Climate Change Science Program essential climate variables
Will be covered in more detail in following presentation
Would fly in formation with NPOESS PM to provide imager data
Two options were examined:
Research spacecraft
Planned 5-year mission
Single string development with selective redundancy
Inexpensive, non-standard launch vehicle
Ground segment leverages existing systems.
Operational spacecraft
Planned 7-year mission with additional redundancy
Standard launch vehicle
Additional investment in ground segment
Current cost estimate range for a 3-sensor satellite is approximately $700M-$1100M
CDR Science Support is an additional $300M-$450M
NPOESS sun-synchronous orbits are NOT ideal for precision altimetry
Flight of an altimeter on NPOESS is NOT recommended
For this analysis, “free flyer” satellites in the NOAA / EUMETSAT JASON series are assumed
Three satellites beyond JASON 2 required to provide coverage to 2026
Costs estimated for JASON 3, 4, and 5
Advanced altimeter costs also estimated
May replace JASON class missions starting with JASON 4
Independent of this study, U.S. Navy is working with the IPO to develop costs and options to procure an operational oceanography radar altimeter
Current total cost estimate for a series of 3 missions ranges from approximately $1.5B-$2.1B
CDR Science Support is an additional ~$200M
Current cost estimate for a single JASON follow-on is approximately $470M with the potential for 50/50 cost sharing with partners
TABLE Climate Goal Partnering Opportunities (Preliminary) [p. 19]
|
|
Partner |
Sensor or Capability |
Timeframe |
Role |
|
Increasing Potential → |
EUMETSAT |
Jason-3 |
2013-2018 |
Mitigate |
|
NASA/Navy |
Adv. Altimeter |
TBD |
Mitigate |
|
|
ESA/JAXA (Earthcare) |
APS/ERBS-like |
2010-20xx |
Mitigate |
|
|
ESA GMES Sentinel 3 |
Altimeter |
|
Complement |
|
|
Navy (NPOESS) |
Altimeter (Op) |
2016-2026 |
Complement |
|
|
Navy (DoD Space Test Program) |
Altimeter (Op) |
|
Complement |
|
|
CNES Megha-Tropiques |
ERBS-like |
|
Complement |
|
|
Chinese SOA (HY series) |
Altimeter |
|
Mitigate |
|
|
Brazilian Space Agency (Amazonia) |
Flight Opportunity |
2010/2015 |
Accommodation |
|
|
EUMETSAT (MSG) |
ERBS-like |
on-orbit |
Complement |
|
|
Chinese Met. Agency (FY series) |
ERBS-like |
|
Mitigate |
|
|
ESA PARASOL |
APS-like |
on-orbit |
Complement |
VIIRS
Reduced imaging capability for mid-morning orbit
Discussions on-going with EUMETSAT about an advanced imager on METOP-D
Optical Crosstalk
MIS
Reduced capability microwave imager
First MIS scheduled to fly on NPOESS C2 (2016)
Discussion on-going with JAXA about AMSR-2
Pursuing several options for continuity of ocean vector wind measurements
TABLE Near-Term Planning [p.21 ]
|
|
Decision/Funding Commitment |
Launch Readiness Date |
|
CERES on NPP |
September 2007 / FY07* |
September 2009 |
|
TSIS on LDCM |
January 2008 / FY09 |
Late 2011 |
|
JASON-3 |
Decision CY08 / FY10 |
2013 |
|
First Climate Free-Flyer |
Mid 2009 / Pre-Phase A FY08 |
2014 |
|
* Would require re-allocation of existing funds |
||
Listen closely to the input from this Workshop
Continue to work with OSTP
Continue dialogue regarding potential international and/or domestic partnerships