Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation (1994)

Chapter: 3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES

Previous Chapter: 2 PLANNING MAJOR PROJECTS
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 61
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 62
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 63
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 64
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 65
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 66
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 67
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 68
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 69
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 70
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 71
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 72
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 73
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 74
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 75
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 76
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 77
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 78
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 79
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 80
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 81
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 82
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 83
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 84
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 85
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 86
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 87
Suggested Citation: "3 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: CRITERIA AND REVIEW PROCEDURES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2268.
Page 88
Next Chapter: 4 AWARDING MAJOR PROJECTS: NSB ROLE, REVIEW PROCESS DESIGN, AND DECISION...
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.