Finding. CO2 Emissions from Commercial Aircraft. More than 90 percent of CO2 emissions from global commercial aircraft operations are generated by large aircraft (i.e., twin-aisle and single-aisle airplanes with more than100 passengers), so research to reduce commercial aircraft emissions will be most useful if it focuses on technology applicable to these large commercial aircraft.
Recommendation. High-Priority Approaches. Agencies and organizations in government, industry, and academia with an interest in developing propulsion and energy system technologies that could reduce CO2 emissions from global civil aviation and that could be introduced into service during the next 10 to 30 years should execute a national research agenda that places the highest priority on four approaches:
Finding. Rationales. The rationales for investing in each of the four recommended high-priority approaches are as follows:
___________________
1 Turboelectric propulsion systems use gas turbines to drive electrical generators that power electric motors that drive propulsors (fans or propellers). A partial-turboelectric system is a promising variant of the full turboelectric system that uses electric propulsion to provide part of the propulsive power; the rest is provided by a turbofan driven by a gas turbine. In contrast, hybrid electric systems use high-capacity batteries to provide some or all of the propulsive power during one or more phases of flight, and all-electric systems rely solely on batteries for propulsive power. The term “electric propulsion” encompasses all of these concepts.
configurations such as lower fan pressure ratio engines in nacelles on standard tube-and-wing aircraft as well as significant departures from standard configurations including modified aircraft platforms, distributed propulsion concepts, and boundary layer ingestion configurations.
Hybrid-electric and all-electric systems were considered but are not recommended as a high priority because the committee determined that batteries with the power capacity and specific power3 required for commercial aircraft at least as large as a regional jet are unlikely to be matured to the point that products satisfying FAA certification requirements can be developed within the 30-year time frame addressed by this report. The same situation applies to technologies associated with superconducting motors and generators, fuel cells, and cryogenic fuels, and other potential approaches and technologies that are not included in the list of high-priority approaches above or the list of high-priority research projects described below.
Finding. Systemic Challenges. To be successful, any approach to reducing CO2 emissions from commercial aviation must overcome two systemic challenges:
___________________
2 Although turboelectric concepts include a gas turbine, the potential improvements resulting from research in gas turbine engine research (potentially up to 30 percent) and turboelectric propulsion (potentially up to 20 percent) do not together imply that future aircraft have the potential for improvements up to 50 percent.
3 In this report, “specific power” and “specific energy” refer to power and energy per unit mass, respectively, and “power density” and “energy density” refer to power and energy per unit volume.
Finding. Technical, Economic, and Policy Challenges. The success of each individual approach to reducing CO2 emissions from commercial aviation requires overcoming technical, economic, and/or policy challenges.
___________________
4 This challenge, which also appears as a challenge for aircraft–propulsion integration, is listed as a challenge for gas turbine research because it is a prerequisite for achieving significant improvement in gas turbine engine propulsive efficiency.
Chapters 2-5 identified high-priority approaches and research projects for developing propulsion and energy systems to reduce commercial aviation carbon emissions globally. The research projects respond to all of the technical challenges, but some of the economic and policy challenges cannot be overcome by research and technology development.
Recommendation. National Research Agenda. Agencies and organizations in government, industry, and academia with an interest in developing propulsion and energy system technologies that could reduce CO2 emissions from global civil aviation and could be introduced into service during the next 10 to 30 years should execute a national research agenda focused on high-priority research projects in the four recommended high-priority approaches, as follows:
— Nacelles for ultrahigh bypass ratio gas turbines. Develop nacelle and integration technologies to enable ultrahigh bypass ratio propulsors.5
— Boundary layer ingestion. Pursue technologies that can enable boundary layer ingestion to reduce the velocity defect in the aircraft wake (also known as wake cancellation) and thus reduce cruise energy consumption.
— Low pressure ratio fan propulsors. Develop low pressure ratio fan propulsors to improve turbofan propulsive efficiency.
— Engine materials and coatings. Develop materials and coatings that will enable higher engine operating temperatures.
— Small engine cores. Develop technologies to improve the efficiency of engines with small cores so as to reach efficiency levels comparable to or better than engines with large cores.
— Turboelectric aircraft system studies. Conduct more encompassing studies of aircraft powered by turboelectric systems in order to better understand the benefits, component performance sensitivities, certification issues, and trade-offs related to key aircraft systems, such as thermal management and energy storage.
— Core turboelectric technologies. Develop the core technologies that are required for megawatt-class turboelectric propulsion systems: motors, generators, inverters, power distribution, and circuit protection.
— Megawatt-class research facilities. Develop research facilities for megawatt-class electric power and thermal management systems suitable for testing turboelectric aircraft propulsion systems.
— SAJF industry modeling and analysis. Undertake research to enable detailed and comprehensive modeling and analysis of SAJF development efforts and impacts at microscale (individual projects)
___________________
5 This research project is closely related to the gas turbine research project on low pressure ratio fan propulsors, and work on the two projects should be closely coordinated.
and macroscale (nationwide or worldwide) levels to support the needs of policymakers and industry practitioners.
— Low-cost feedstocks. Support continued development of sustainable, low-cost feedstocks and associated systems that have the potential to enable the large-scale production of economically viable SAJF.
— Conversion processes, fuel production, and scale-up. Develop technologies and processes for cost-effective feedstock conversion, fuel production, and scale-up from pilot and demonstration facilities to enable full-scale production of SAJF.
— SAJF fuel testing, qualification, and certification. Improve fuel testing, qualification, and certification processes to lower testing costs, increase throughput, and enhance understanding of fuel properties.
It will not be possible to execute the recommended research agenda without commitment, resources, leadership, and focus from relevant agencies and organizations in government, industry, and academia. Within the government, key players include the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of Energy (DOE), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), NASA, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Transportation, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Science Foundation.
Supporting research in all four of the high-priority approaches is prudent both to reduce current CO2 emissions and to alleviate the potential consequences of future aviation growth worldwide. The research projects within each high-priority approach would rely on academia and industry to play the same role that they normally play in the development of new technologies and products. In particular, academia would generally participate in the projects at lower levels of technology readiness, while industry would focus on more advanced research and product development.
The FAA would be most directly engaged in the development of certification standards and methodologies for technologies not well covered by current practices.
DOD would have an interest in all four of the high-priority approaches to the extent that they could improve the capability of military aircraft or, in the case of SAJF, address the larger goal of reducing the environmental impact of defense operations.
NASA would contribute primarily by supporting basic and applied research in all four approaches, though it would likely play a lesser role in SAJF development given that much of the research (e.g., on feedstocks and fuel conversion processes) does not concern a NASA mission area.
DOE and its national laboratories would contribute primarily to the development of batteries, fuel cells, gas turbines, and SAJF feedstocks and conversion processes.
The primary contributions of the Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency would be feedstock development and modeling of the SAJF industry, and the Department of Transportation would also make broad contributions to the SAJF research projects.
The Department of Commerce and National Science Foundation could help primarily in improving fuel testing, evaluation, and qualification processes for SAJF.
Recommendation. Organizational Research Priorities. The relative priority that various agencies and organizations assign to the four recommended high-priority approaches and research projects within each approach should be guided by (1) the importance a given organization attaches to the rationales associated with each approach, (2) the resident expertise and mission objectives of the organization, and (3) the desired mix of a given organization’s research portfolio in terms of risk, technical maturity, and economic potential.
Developing new technology for large commercial aircraft requires substantial time and resources, and there are well-established pathways for doing so, particularly with regard to improving gas turbine technology and aircraft–propulsion integration. Both of these approaches are well established and there are substantial motivations for four organizations with extensive research capabilities—the Department of Defense (and, in particular, its research laboratories), the Department of Energy (and its national laboratories), NASA (and its research centers), and the commercial aircraft industry (and its research centers)—to develop advanced technologies. In fact, these organizations, among others mentioned above, are already developing advanced technologies that are relevant to low carbon aviation. Although the missions of these organizations are very different, there are many points of commonality, and even greater progress could be accomplished by aligning relevant research programs in accordance with the recommended high-priority approaches and research projects.
In contrast, the funding situation for the other two approaches, turboelectric propulsion and SAJF, is somewhat problematic. It is not clear when turboelectric propulsion technology will advance to the point that it provides the performance needed for practical application in commercial aircraft. It is similarly uncertain when SAJF will be able to compete economically with conventional (petroleum-based) jet fuels, especially considering the capital costs of founding a new industry, and the fluctuating prices of conventional jet fuel. Currently available resources are making technological advances relevant to turboelectric propulsion and SAJF. Financial requirements, however, will increase substantially as the level of technology readiness increases and the next step requires, for example, flight tests of prototypes of high-power turboelectric systems or the development of full-scale SAJF production facilities. Even so, the turboelectric research projects will likely be able to maintain momentum as long as they achieve technological milestones for higher power systems. Options for sustaining SAJF research include leveraging the interest of multiple agencies with more focus on addressing global climate and energy concerns, such as the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the Department of Transportation, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and entities interested in fostering rural and economic development, such as the Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, and state and local governments and public-private partnerships.