Management Models for Future Seismological and Geodetic Facilities and Capabilities: Proceedings of a Workshop (2019)
Chapter: 6 General Comment Period
Visit
NAP.edu/10766
to get more information about this book, to buy it in print, or to
download it as a free PDF.
Previous Chapter:
5 Advantages and Disadvantages of Management Models for Accommodating Seismological and Geodetic Facility Capabilities
6
Next Chapter: 7 Management Models for Future Seismological and Geodetic Facilities
Suggested Citation:
"6 General Comment Period." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Management Models for Future Seismological and Geodetic Facilities and Capabilities: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/25536.
6
General Comment Period
The workshop planning committee provided an opportunity for participants in the room to make public comments. Individuals were given 3 minutes each to comment on any relevant topic. Appendix E is an unedited transcript of those comments. Below is a list of commenters and the topics they raised.
- Maggie Benoit, National Science Foundation (NSF): Explanation of why NSF funded the workshop.
- Eric Webb, Sandia National Laboratory: Student intern programs, life-cycle costs of sustaining capabilities, and difficulty partnering with NSF.
- Michael Foote, The University of Chicago: Federal limitations on international collaborations.
- Jim Yoder, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: Small Business Innovative Research Program model.
- Doug Hollett, Melroy & Hollett Technology Partners, LLC: Increased interaction between applied engineering and research science communities.
- Egill Hauksson, California Institute of Technology: Fostering understanding of instrumentation among graduate students.
- Sergio Barrientos, National Seismological Center, University of Chile: Partnerships for sustaining operational standards of earthquake early warning systems.
- Glen Mattioli, UNAVCO: Response to Barrientos’ question about partnerships.
- Rick Aster, Colorado State University: Continued response to Barrientos’s question about partnerships.
- Kate Moran, Ocean Networks Canada: Partnerships in Canada (including answers to interjected questions from Hollett).
- Enrique Cabral-Cano, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico: Governance as part of management, U.S./international collaborations.
Suggested Citation:
"6 General Comment Period." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Management Models for Future Seismological and Geodetic Facilities and Capabilities: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/25536.
- Xyoli Pérez-Campos, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico: Balance of science and monitoring at a small facility.
- Ben Phillips, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): NASA scale of support of geodetic data systems.
- Andrea Donnellan, Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Complementary expertise incorporated into a management structure.
- Michael West, University of Alaska Fairbanks: Federal advocacy efforts through Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology and UNAVCO.
Suggested Citation:
"6 General Comment Period." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Management Models for Future Seismological and Geodetic Facilities and Capabilities: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/25536.
Suggested Citation:
"6 General Comment Period." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Management Models for Future Seismological and Geodetic Facilities and Capabilities: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi: 10.17226/25536.
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.