To conclude the first day of the workshop, planning committee member Jeffrey Siegel (University of Toronto) recounted some of the themes that cut across several of the presentations. The first was that when considering indoor fine particulate matter, it is important to account for precursors and other things that can modify PM2.5, such as the presence of vapor-phase material that can condense into particulates. He named five broad categories of influential factors: situational, building and HVAC, activity and mobility, occupant perceptions and behavior (noting that how people perceive the risks associated with particulate matter might modify their behavior, leading to changes in exposure and even how much is generated), and measurement. It was important to remember, he emphasized, that these factors cut across indoor and ambient particulate matter and were interrelated, not independent of one another.
Siegel noted a strong sentiment among the speakers for addressing the underlying causes of exposure disparities. This is, as Ivey observed, a systemic problem that requires systemic solutions, and the hunt for those solutions should be a primary driver of research needs.
Throughout the day, the speakers identified the need for research to
Corsi closed the session by thanking the speakers and other participants for their contributions.