The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the economy and society and will continue to impact aspects of life for years to come. Public transit demand and service in the United States shifted due to the pandemic, leading to significant challenges, as well as innovation. In response to this crisis, public transit organizations engaged in diverse initiatives to meet their community’s needs. These initiatives, often created through partnerships with other organizations, utilized transit agency resources in nontraditional ways, including for services like delivery of food and supplies; internet provision; and supporting access to medical care, COVID-19 testing, and vaccinations.
This synthesis collects information on initiatives and partnerships that formed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study documents the range of nontraditional initiatives implemented and the ways in which transit agencies assessed community needs, formed partnerships to implement these initiatives, leveraged diverse funding sources, and supported equity goals in their communities. The goal of the study is to inform future partnership collaboration and improve pandemic and other emergency response planning.
This synthesis focuses on instances where transit organizations used their resources to perform nontraditional functions during the pandemic. Many of these involved partnerships with other organizations from the public, nonprofit, and private sectors. Transit agencies adapted in a variety of ways to best meet the needs of the communities they serve, with initiatives including:
Transit agencies partnered with a range of organizations, often working with more than one partner for any given initiative or working together with the same partner on multiple efforts. The most common partners were local governments, followed by state health and human services departments. Food banks and other nonprofits were also frequent partners. Transit agencies also collaborated with medical facilities; pharmacies; grocery stores; public
schools; universities; other transit agencies; private rideshare operators; and state agencies, including state departments of transportation (DOTs).
The synthesis secondarily documents ways in which transit agencies responded to the pandemic through traditional transit operations strategies—such as adjusting or expanding service to meet the needs of essential workers and transit-reliant communities or to fill in gaps caused by temporary service cuts. While not the study’s core focus, these initiatives were put in place as part of the agencies’ overall pandemic response, alongside the less traditional initiatives.
In implementing the initiatives, transit agencies leveraged a range of funding sources, with the most common being federal transportation, state, and local funds. Other sources included funds from nongovernmental organizations, federal non-transportation sources, and the private sector. Many transit agencies used funds from one or more of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 (CRRSAA), and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA), the three federal COVID-19 funding packages with allocations for transit. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) provided flexibility in the use of CARES, CRRSAA, ARPA, and regular federal formula funds during the pandemic, which allowed vehicles and stations to be used for nontransit functions like food delivery or serving as Wi-Fi hotspots.
This research highlights the following lessons from the pandemic to support transit agencies in building their future emergency and pandemic preparedness: