Previous Chapter: 6 Conclusions
Page 41
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Evaluation of the Every Day Counts Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28871.

References

Arundel, A., C. Bloch, and B. Ferguson. 2019. “Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals.” Research Policy 48 (3): 789–798.

———. 2016. Measuring Innovation in the Public Sector. Australian Innovation Research Centre, Hobart, Australia: University of Tasmania.

Daglio, M., D. Gerson, and H. Kitchen. 2015. Building Organizational Capacity for Public Sector Innovation. Paris: OECD.

EDC Program. n.d. EDC-1 Innovations. Accessed May 31, 2024. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc-1.cfm.

———. 2015. Implementation Plan for e-Construction: Efficiency Through Technology and Collaboration. Implementation Plan, Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/econstruction/implementation_plan.pdf.

FHWA. 2017. EDC-3 Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.

Kaur, M., H. Buisman, A. Bekker, and C. McCullouch. 2022. Innovation Capacity of Governments: A Systematic Framework. Working Paper on Public Governance No. 51, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. doi:10.1787/52389006-en.

Mendez, V. 2013. Every Day Counts: An Innovation Initiative. Cambridge, MA, October 9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOfZ0iy5kUo.

North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2021. “Lessons Learned from State DOTs on Innovation and Knowledge Management.”

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2002. “Frascati Manual: proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development (6th ed.).” Paris. www.oecd.org/sti/frascatimanual.

———. 2005. “The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.” Paris: Oslo Manual.

Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd. New York: The Free Press.

———. 1976. “New product adoption and diffusion.” Journal of Consumer Research 290–301.

Ruegg, R., and G. Jordan. 2007. Overview of Evaluation Methods for R&D Programs. Contractor Report, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.

U.S. GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2016. Open Innovation: Practices to Engage Citizens and Effectively Implement Federal Initiatives. Washington, DC: GAO.

———. 2011. “Performance measurement and evaluation: Definitions and relationships.” http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-646SP.

van Oorschot, J., E. Hofman, and J. Halman. 2018. “A bibliometric view of the innovation adoption literature.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 134: 1–21.

Wenk, E., and T.J. Kuehn. 1977. “Interinstitutional networks in technology delivery systems.” In Science and Technology Policy, by J. Haberer, 153–175. Lexington: Lexington Books.

Yin, R. 1992. “The case method as a tool for doing evaluation.” Current Sociology 40 (1): 121–137.

Page 41
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Evaluation of the Every Day Counts Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28871.
Page 41
Next Chapter: Glossary
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.