Table F-1. Industry members responding to the survey.
| Member Name |
|---|
| Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association (Alabama APA) |
| American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA) |
| Arkansas Asphalt Pavement Association (Arkansas APA) |
| Bituminous Roadways, Inc. (BRI) |
| Kansas Asphalt Pavement Association (Kansas APA) |
| Kokosing Materials, Inc. (KMI) |
| MeadWestvaco Corporation (MWV Co) |
| New York Construction Materials Association (NYCMA) |
| PAragon Technical Services (PAragon) |
| South Carolina Asphalt Pavement Association (South Carolina APA) |
| Texas Asphalt Pavement Association (Texas APA) |
| Wisconsin Concrete Pavement Association (Wisconsin CPA) |
Table F-2. Effectiveness of pavement and drainage features for mitigating damage to asphalt and composite pavements due to the presence of water.
| Feature | Effectiveness1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Aggregate permeable base | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Curb and gutter | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Ditches | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Edge drains | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Fin drains | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Open-graded friction course | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Permeable friction course | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Asphalt permeable base | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Geosynthetic separator layer | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Underdrain | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| Daylighted base | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Cement permeable base | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Retrofit edge drain | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
1 Rated on a scale of 1 (ineffective) to 5 (effective). Values shown represent the number of responding agencies.
Table F-3. Drainage feature effectiveness in removing water from asphalt and composite pavements.
| Feature | Effectiveness1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Edge drain | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Underdrain | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| Fin drain | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Aggregate trench | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
1 Scale of 1 (ineffective) to 5 (effective). Values shown represent the number of responding agencies.
Table F-4. Effective methods for reducing the impact of weak soils.
| Industry | Replace with Higher Quality Material | Increase Aggregate Base Layer Thickness | Increase Concrete Layer Thickness | Increase Asphalt Layer Thickness | Stabilize Weak Soil | Place a Geosynthetic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| BRI | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| KMI | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAragon | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| South Carolina | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| APA | ||||||
| Texas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| No. of Responses | 12 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 8 |
―N/A
Table F-5. Effective methods for addressing high or perched water tables.
| Industry | Typically Not a Concern | Install Culverts | Install Edge drains | Increase Depth of Ditch | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| Alabama APA | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Course aggregate drains as subbase |
| BRI | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| KMI | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| MWV Co. | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| NYCMA | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― |
| PAragon | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| Texas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | Address during design |
| No. of Responses | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 2 |
―N/A
Table F-6. Effective use of geosynthetics.
| Industry | Subgrade Separation | Subgrade Stabilization | Base Reinforcement | Stress Absorbing Layer & Reinforcement | Drainage Systems |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| BRI | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― |
| KMI | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| MWV Co. | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| PAragon | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Texas APA | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| No. of Responses | 7 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
―N/A
Eight responding industry members indicated that the most appropriate time to install a drainage system is prior to pavement construction, placed at pavement/shoulder edge. In relation to inspecting/verifying the effectiveness of the installed drainage system, members indicted:
Table F-7. Effective methods for monitoring subgrade compaction.
| Industry | Proof rolling | In-place density | Number of passes | Moisture content |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| MWV Co. | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― |
| PAragon | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― |
| South Carolina APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Texas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― |
| No. of Responses | 8 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
―N/A
Table F-8. Effective methods for monitoring placement of permeable aggregate base/aggregate separator layer placement.
| Industry | Layer Thickness | In-Place Density | No. of Passes | Aggregate Gradation | Permeability/Drainability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAragon | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| South Carolina APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Texas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA1 | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| No. of Responses | 8 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 6 |
1 Falling head permeameter, ensuring placement of pavement layers.
―N/A
Table F-9. Effective methods for monitoring placement of asphalt-treated bases.
| Industry | Placement Temperature | Compaction Temperature | Layer Thickness | In-Place Density | No. of Passes | Aggregate Gradation | Binder Content | Permeability/Drainability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ― |
| MWV Co. | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAragon | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| South Carolina APA | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Texas APA | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA1 | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| No. of Responses | 2 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
1 Falling head permeameter.
―N/A
Table F-10. Effective methods for monitoring placement of cement-treated permeable bases.
| Industry | Layer Thickness | In-Place Density | No. of Passes | Aggregate Gradation | Cement Content | Curing Method | Permeability/Drainability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAragon | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Wisconsin CPA1 | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | 150-200 lb/yd3 | ✓ | ✓ |
| No. of Responses | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
1 Falling head permeameter.
―N/A
Table F-11. Effective methods for curing cement-treated permeable bases.
| Industry | None | Polyethylene sheeting | Fine mist curing | Curing compound |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― |
| MWV Co. | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Wisconsin CPA | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| No. of Responses | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
―N/A
Table F-12. Effective methods for measuring asphalt mixture in-place density.
| Industry | Cores | Nuclear density gauge | Non-nuclear density gauge |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ― | ✓ | ― |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ― | ✓ | ― |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAragon | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| South Carolina APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Texas APA | ✓ | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ― | ✓ | ― |
| No. of Responses | 7 | 9 | 4 |
―N/A
Table F-13. Asphalt pavement distresses that indicate damage due to the presence of water.
| Industry | Cracking | Heaving | Increased Roughness | Patching | Potholes | Pumping | Raveling | Rutting | Segregation | Stripping | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allig | Long | Tran | ||||||||||
| ACPA | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| PAragon | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| South Carolina | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| APA | ||||||||||||
| Texas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― |
| No. of Responses | 9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
―N/A
Table F-14. Composite pavement distresses that indicate damage due to the presence of water.
| Industry | Cracking | Increased Roughness | Patching | Potholes | Pumping | Raveling | Segregation | Stripping | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allig | Long | Refl | ||||||||
| ACPA | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| PAragon | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Texas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― |
| No. of Responses | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
―N/A
Table F-15. Effective drainage system inspection techniques and preventive maintenance activities.
| Industry | Repair / Replace Components | Video Inspection | Inspect Pipe System | Flush Edge drains | Unplug Outlets, Filters, & Drains | Mow Around Outlet Pipes | Clean Ditch | Deepen Ditch | Mow & Clean Ditches | Remove Debris from Culverts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAragon | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| South Carolina APA | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Wisconsin CPA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| No. of Responses | 7 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
―N/A
Table F-16. Effective preservation activities for minimizing damage in asphalt pavements.
| Industry | Crack Sealing | Surface Seal | Chip Seal | Microsurfacing | Thin Asphalt Overlay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA1 | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | Annual | ― | 5 to 10 yrs | ― | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| MWV Co. | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA | Annual | ― | As needed | As needed | As needed |
| PAragon | Annual | Every 2 yrs | 3 yrs | 7 yrs | 5 yrs |
| South Carolina | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| APA | |||||
| Texas APA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Wisconsin CPA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| No. of Responses | 8 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
1 Concrete overlay.
―N/A
Table F-17. Effective preservation activities for minimizing damage in composite pavements.
| Industry | Crack Sealing | Surface Seal | Chip Seal | Microsurfacing | Thin Asphalt Overlay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA1 | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| MWV Co. | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PAragon | annual | 2 yrs | 3 yrs | 7 yrs | 5 yrs |
| South Carolina | ― | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| APA | |||||
| Texas APA | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| No. of Responses | 6 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
1 Concrete overlay.
―N/A
Table F-18. Effective rehabilitation treatments for minimizing damage in asphalt pavements.
| Industry | Asphalt Overlay | Unbonded Concrete Overlay | Asphalt Overlay & Saw & Seal | Mill & Asphalt Overlay | Mill, Asphalt Overlay, & Saw & Seal | Cold In-Place Recycling | Hot In-Place Recycling | Reconstruct | Retrofit Edge drains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA1 | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| Arkansas APA | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA2 | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| PAragon | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| South Carolina APA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ✓ |
| Texas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ✓ | ― |
| No. of Responses | 7 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
1 Mill and bonded concrete overlay (e.g., 6x6x6).
2 Drainage rehabilitation.
―N/A
Table F-19. Effective rehabilitation treatments for minimizing damage in composite pavements.
| Industry | Asphalt Overlay | Asphalt Overlay & Saw & Seal | Mill & Asphalt Overlay | Mill, Asphalt Overlay, & Saw & Seal | Hot In-Place Recycling | Reconstruct | Retrofit Edge drains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACPA | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alabama APA | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| Arkansas APA | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas APA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ― | ― |
| MWV Co. | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| NYCMA1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― |
| PAragon | ― | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ |
| Texas APA | ✓ | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― | ― |
| Wisconsin CPA | ― | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ― | ✓ | ― |
| No. of Responses | 5 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
1 Drainage rehabilitation.
―N/A
Table F-20. Feature effectiveness/impact on damage to asphalt and composite pavements due to the presence of water.
| Feature | Effectiveness1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Pavement drainage design | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Asphalt mixture air voids (in-place density) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Asphalt mixture type | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Asphalt mixture binder content | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Environmental conditions | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Asphalt mixture additives | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Base type | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| Pavement age | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Asphalt mixture aggregate quality | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Traffic level | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
1 Rated on a scale of 1 (ineffective) to 5 (effective). Values shown represent the number of responding agencies.