Robert B. Allen, Bellcore
Robert H. Anderson, RAND
Ronald E. Anderson, University of Minnesota
Robert M. Ballard, North Carolina Central University
Alan W. Biermann, Duke University
Tony Brewer, Pivot Partners
Peter P. Chen, Louisiana State University
Martin Dickey, University of Washington
Linda S. Dobb, Bowling Green State University
Michael B. Eisenberg, Syracuse University and ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology
Zorana Ercegovac, University of California, Los Angeles
Susan Gerhart, Applied Formal Methods, Inc. and ROI Joint Venture
Stephen A.B. Gilbert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Connie Hendrix, San Francisco Unified School District
Charles F. Kelemen, Swarthmore College
Allen Klinger, University of California, Los Angeles
Susan Landau, University of Massachusetts
Larry Long, Long and Associates
Note: Pointers to many of the position papers presented by these participants can be found online at <http://www2.nas.edu/cstbweb>.
Ellen Meltzer, University of California, Berkeley
David G. Messerschmitt, University of California, Berkeley
Jeanine Meyer, Pace University
Paul Nielson, Manitoba Library Association
Jim Perry, Kinko's Inc.
Viera K. Proulx, Northeastern University
Richard S. Rosenberg, University of British Columbia
Linda Loos Scarth, Mount Mercy College
Greg W. Scragg, State University of New York at Geneseo
Mary Shaw, Carnegie Mellon University
Ralph D. Westfall, University of Southern California
Marsha Cook Woodbury, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
1. For purposes of this discussion, the committee provisionally distinguishes in a loose and informal way between fundamental concepts, applications of fundamental concepts, and engineering and design principles used in applying concepts. To illustrate, a concept might be "instruction interpretation." An application of that concept might be "Java byte-code interpretation." An engineering principle might be "design under constraint" (e.g., designing a Java interpreter under the constraint of limited memory or bandwidth).
1a. What are the fundamental concepts of information technology that an educated adult should know? (Interpret information technology broadly to include computing and communications.) For each concept:
1b. What are the essential applications of the fundamental concepts?
1c. What are the essential engineering and/or design principles relevant to information technology?
2. How do you expect the essential concepts, applications, and engineering/design principles described in your answers to change over time (as information technology evolves)? How should the pedagogical process deal with such changes? How can/should individuals be taught to learn about how to use new and never-before-seen computational artifacts (e.g., new applications, services, hardware devices, software packages)?
3. How should concepts and skills be balanced in information technology literacy? How do/should concepts and skills complement each other in information technology literacy? How do they compete with each other? In other words, how and to what extent is there a trade-off in learning about concepts versus skills? (For purposes of this discussion, the committee regards a "skill" as facility with a specific computational tool or artifact such as a spreadsheet.)
4. How can individuals best learn the limitations of information technology? How can they learn to make informed personal/social/policy decisions about issues that involve information technology?