Ability, defining, 85
Accountability, 8
Achievement, grading and communicating, 1, 64-65, 68-69
Administrative support, 102
Advanced Placement examinations, 2
Alternative assessment, 31.
See also Science Education for Public Understanding Program
American College Testing (ACT) Program, 2
American Federation of Teachers (AFT), 69
Assessment, 33-49.
See also Formative assessment;
Summative assessment
at any time, 24
beyond a single test, 74
changing emphases in, 19
creating opportunities for, 42
defined, 12
design, selection and participation in, 16-17, 37
form matching purpose, 35-38
and high standards, 19-20
multiple purposes of, 20-21
nature and form of feedback, 39-40
providing time for, 101
questioning, 35
reflective practice in, 34
in scientific experimentation, 40-47
subject-matter goals, 38-39
in teaching standards, 50
terms used in, 31
timing of, 40
using to inform teaching or influence learning, 12
Assessment activities, 19, 60-64
table of, 63
Assessment-centered professional development, 83-88
articulating a plan, 86
establishing goals, 83-84
exploring conceptions of learning, 87-88
giving feedback to students, 86-87
identifying student understanding, 84-86
understanding of subject matter, 87
Assessment data
collecting, 49
involving teachers in using, 1, 9, 12, 24
managing, 52
Assessment in the classroom, 4, 7-58
consistent with pedagogy, 51
equity principle in, 52-55
examination of student work, 35
external standards-based summative, 73-74
formative, 13-15, 25-26, 30-32
present state of, 33-49
school's role in, 18-19
strengthening, 11-21
student involvement in, 42, 48-49
student's role in, 17-18
teacher's role in, 15-17
validity and reliability of, 55-58
Authentic assessment, 31
Class size, 101-102
Classroom assessment, 7-58
case for strengthening, 11-21
equity principle in, 52-55
formative, 13-15, 25-26, 30-32
and high standards, 19-20
multiple purposes of, 20-21
present situation, 33-49
school's role in, 18-19
student's role in, 17-18
teacher's role in, 15-17
validity and reliability of, 55-58
vignettes of, 5, 26-30, 43-47, 89-95
Collaboration, in professional development, 81-82
Committee on Science Education (COSE K-12), 3
Communicating achievement, 64-65, 68-69
Community involvement, and parents, 103
Conceptions of learning, 87-88
Conversations for assessment, 19
in vignettes of classrooms, 27
Criterion-referenced tests (CRTs), 72
Cumulative assessment.
See Summative assessment
Current reform
in Connecticut, 76-77
in Delaware, 89-95
in Douglas, Colorado, 77
in Kentucky, 75
learning from, 74-76
in Queensland, Australia, 76
in Vermont, 75
D Data.
See Assessment data
Design of assessment, 16-17, 37
“Disclosure” issues, 54
District level, 99-102
administrative support, 102
class size, 101-102
professional development, 100
time, 100-101
Embedded assessment, 31
Equity principle, 52-55
Esteem.
See Self-esteem
Evidence and Tradeoffs (ET) Variable, in SEPUP, 68
Experiments, assessment of scientific, 40-47
External assessment
for consistency, 2
standards-based summative, 73-74
Feedback
cognitive and affective, 15-16
giving to students, 86-87
Formative assessment, 4, 25-26, 30-32
framework for, 13-15
grading and communicating achievement, 64-65, 68-69
relationship to summative, 59-77
in scientific experimentation, 40-47
Forms
to match purpose, 35-38
performance assessments, 60-61
portfolios, 61-62
summative assessment in the classroom, 60-64
traditional tests, 62-64
Framework for formative assessment, 13-15
and science content, 14-15
assessment consistent with pedagogy, 51
assessment data management, 52
use of assessment data, 51-52, 56
Goals
establishing, 83-84
learning, 39
Grading
to convey information, 16
High standards, maintaining, 19-20
Higher education for teachers, 102-103
How People Learn, 84
Information, involving teachers in using, 1, 9, 12, 24
Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards, 86
Inservice training, 100
Intelligence, defining, 54, 85
in vignettes of classrooms, 27
Knowledge, pedagogical, 14
Large-scale external assessment, 2, 69
the current system and needed reform, 71-73
Learning
exploring conceptions of, 87-88
lifelong, 33
not a solitary activity, 13
using assessment to influence, 12
Learning goals, 39
Lifelong learning, 33
Multiple entry points, to professional development, 82-83
Multiple purposes of assessment, 20-21
Multiple roles teachers play, 55
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2
National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), 69
National Education Association (NEA), 69
National Research Council (NRC), 3
National Science Education Standards, 2, 7-9, 11-19, 24-26, 32-33, 52-55, 60, 97-98, 103
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), 2
Nature and form of feedback, 39-40
Norm-referenced tests (NRTs), 72
NRC.
See National Research Council
NRTs.
See Norm-referenced tests
Opportunities, creating, 42
Parental involvement, and community, 103
Participation in assessment, 16-17, 37
Pedagogical knowledge, 14
Pedagogy, assessment consistent with, 51
Peer assessment by students, 19, 48-49
Performance assessments, 12, 19, 31, 60-61
Performance criteria, for teachers, 87
Placement, assessment for, 12
Plans for assessment, 16
articulating, 86
Policy impacts, 97-98
Portfolio assessments, 18-19, 31, 61-62
Practice, professional development rooted in, 80
Professional development, 4, 79-96, 100
agenda for assessment-centered, 83-88
articulating a plan for, 86
basic features of, 96
collaboration in, 81-82
establishing goals for, 83-84
exploring conceptions of learning, 87-88
giving feedback to students, 86-87
identifying student understanding, 84-86
key points for, 96
multiple entry points, 82-83
providing time for, 100-101
supporting student involvement in assessment, 88-96
and understanding of subject matter, 87
Project Zero, 95
in vignettes of classrooms, 26-27
Purposes of assessment, multiple, 20-21
Questioning assessment, 35
Quizzes, 19
Rationale, for strengthening assessment in the science classroom, 11-21
Reflective practice, 19
in assessment, 34
in professional development, 80-81
Reform
going beyond a single test, 74
involving teachers, 75-76
learning from, 74-76
Reliability concerns, 55-58
applying to classroom teaching, 71
in classroom terms, 57-58
defined, 56
in summative assessments, 69-71
Responding to students, 86-87
Responsibility for assessment, sharing, 1, 9
Roles played in assessment
by schools, 18-19
by students, 17-18
by teachers, 15-17
Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT), 2
School districts.
See District level
School level, 99-102
administrative support, 102
class size, 101-102
professional development, 100
role in assessment, 18-19
time, 100-101
Science Education for Public Understanding Program (SEPUP), 65-69
Evidence and Tradeoffs Variable, 68
Selection in assessment, 16-17, 37
Self-assessment by students, 17-18, 48-49
Self-esteem, focusing on, 16, 30
Self-reflection, 19
SEPUP.
See Science Education for Public Understanding Program
Standards
maintaining high, 19-20
teacher's role in implementing, 15
Standards-based summative assessment system, 60
external, 73-74
State level testing policies, 2, 98-99
Student-Involved Classroom Assessment, 37
Student involvement in assessment, 17-18, 42, 48-49
professional development for supporting, 88-96
Student understanding, identifying, 84-86
Student work, examination of, 35
Subject-matter goals, 38-39
and professional development, 87
Summative assessment, 4
in the classroom, 60-64
external standards-based, 73-74
grading and communicating achievement, 64-65, 68-69
relationship to formative, 59-77
serving the standards, 60
validity and reliability in, 69-71
Support
administrative, 102
system-level, 97-104
System-level supports, 4, 97-104
from community and parents, 103
district and school level, 99-102
district and state testing policies, 98-99
external science assessments, 99
goal setting, 103-104
higher education, 102-103
Teacher involvement, 15-17, 75-76
in developing and interpreting standards, 17
in implementing standards, 15
role in design, selection and participation, 16-17, 37
role in external science assessments, 99
role in feedback, cognitive and affective, 15-16
using assessment to inform teaching, 1, 9, 12-13, 24
Teachers
higher education for, 102-103
performance criteria for, 87
playing multiple roles, 55
Teaching standards, 50
developing and interpreting, 17
implementing, 15
Testing
criterion-referenced, 72
district and state policies, 2, 98-99
norm-referenced, 72
Testing policies, impacts of, 97-98
Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), 2
Time for professional development, providing, 100-101
Timing of assessment, 40
Traditional tests and quizzes, 19
using differently, 62-64
Understanding
identifying, 84-86
Validity concerns, 55-58
applying to classroom teaching, 71
in classroom terms, 57-58
in summative assessments, 69-71