Skip to main content
Standing Committee

Standing Committee on Evidence Synthesis and Communications in Diet and Chronic Disease Relationships

A deeper examination of the issues related to research design and methodological approaches to evidence synthesis on diet-disease relationships and risk of chronic disease is needed to better inform the public about dietary choices to advance health and reduce risk of chronic disease. To respond to this need, a standing committee of approximately 8–10 members will be formed to monitor the current literature and identify emerging issues related to advancing the strength and rigor of scientific evidence in nutrition research on chronic disease risk; including effective communication of scientific evidence to the public.

In progress

Any project, supported or not by a committee, that is currently being worked on or is considered active, and will have an end date.

Description

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will establish a standing committee to monitor the current literature and identify emerging issues related to the strength and rigor of scientific evidence in support of nutrition research on chronic disease risk; including effective communication of scientific evidence to the public. The committee will engage in discussions with sponsors about the state of the science on topics focusing on diet and chronic disease relationships that include, but are not limited to:
1. The use of data analytics, modeling, other predictive methodologies and their validation, and evidence synthesis approaches that address the variability in response to diet in nutrition-diet-chronic disease relationships;
2. The range of evidence synthesis of approaches that advance the strength of scientific evidence on causal relationships between diet and chronic disease;
3. Communication of benefit, risk, and uncertainty in health research to the public to inform decision-making about diet to reduce risk of chronic disease; and
4. Consistent messaging about chronic disease prevention or risk reduction across stakeholder organizations and institutions.
Within these subject areas, the committee may also consider broader issues such as conflict of interest and objectivity; standards of scientific rigor and reproducibility; transparency; and accountability. Workshops will be undertaken by separately appointed ad hoc committees with the necessary expertise to identify relevant topics for exploration and to identify speakers. The full standing committee will meet to identify emerging issues, be briefed on new scientific methods or approaches relevant to other issues of interest and discuss areas of expertise that should be added to or dropped from the standing committee. The committee will also discuss topics in conference calls and email correspondence, recommending future work and conducting other business.

Work with Us
Looking for independent, nonpartisan guidance from the nation’s top subject-matter experts? We stand ready to help potential sponsors across a variety of sectors shape research and policy agendas, regulation, investments, operations, state and local initiatives, and more.
Keck building

Collaborators

Committee

Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Sponsors

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Staff

Ann Yaktine

Lead

AYaktine@nas.edu

Alice Vorosmarti

Lead

AVorosmarti@nas.edu

Alice Vorosmarti

AVorosmarti@nas.edu

Jen Stephenson

JStephenson@nas.edu

Melanie Arthur

MArthur@nas.edu

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.