The following sections present the information practitioners need to understand, evaluate, and implement the traffic demand and congestion management strategies best suited for their airports. These sections describe strategies applicable to all commercial-service airports recognizing that they each have different or distinguishing characteristics. Included in each strategy are detailed descriptions of the benefits, disadvantages, capital and operating costs, implementation schedule, potential phasing, flexibility to adapt to unanticipated demands and operations, policy and regulatory issues, and stakeholder impacts and coordination. Descriptions of innovative case studies and technologies are also presented. These strategies are intended to be readily implementable, as opposed to those that require large capital investments and are disruptive to airport operations (e.g., widening or lengthening an elevated curbside roadway or extending rail service to the terminal).
There are three primary strategy categories: Enforcement, Traffic Demand, and Congestion Management Strategies. There are four complementary and/or stand-alone strategy categories: Customer Service, Sustainability, Accommodating TNCs, and Accommodating AVs. Furthermore, numerous supporting technologies are available to enhance these primary and complemental strategies. These supporting technologies are capable of monitoring traffic volumes and locations (by type of vehicle or individual vehicle), automatically dispatching taxicabs and other on-demand services, supporting curbside enforcement by directing officers to vehicles needing attention, guiding motorists by displaying changeable directional or parking information, and can enhance the primary and complemental strategies in other ways as well.
Enforcement of rules and regulations governing airport roadway traffic and curbside operations is a key element of almost all strategies. Without enforcement, some motorists are likely to disobey regulations governing traffic operations and add to roadway congestion. If a few motorists do so, additional drivers may perceive that they too can safely ignore rules and regulations, leading to traffic congestion and delays. This section discusses the programs and technologies to support the personnel responsible for enforcement. Examples include
Key considerations related to enforcing airport roadways include
The number of officers required to manage terminal curbside areas and enforce traffic rules varies among airports reflecting multiple factors including
Information reported by selected airports indicates that, depending upon the previously listed factors and other considerations, one officer can patrol between 400 to 800 linear feet of terminal curbside. For example, an airport with about 7,500 linear feet of curbside divided among two levels reported having 15 officers patrolling the curbsides during peak periods, or about one officer for every 500 feet. These officers are in addition to those required to patrol non-terminal area roadways or provide security elsewhere at the airport.
Traffic flow management and enforcement responsibilities can be assigned to law enforcement officers (LEOs), who are sworn officers; traffic control officers (TCOs), who are civilian officers; or more frequently a combination of the two. Use of LEOs and TCOs varies widely among airports, reflecting each airport’s prioritization of customer service and enforcement, budget, configuration, governance, and other factors.
LEOs are public sector employees sworn in as police officers, sheriffs, or other positions to enforce the laws in the jurisdiction they serve. An LEO is licensed to carry a weapon, arrest violators, issue tickets, and perform other duties. At an airport, the responsibilities of LEOs may include enforcing airport rules and regulations and federal security directives (e.g., supporting TSA staff), responding to airport emergencies, conducting patrols and investigations, and managing traffic flow. LEOs working at airports may be (1) a member of the airport staff who reports to the airport director or (2) a member of a municipal police unit or patrol district assigned to the airport who reports to the municipal chief of police while coordinating with airport staff.
TCOs are public or private sector employees whose responsibilities at an airport may include managing roadway traffic flows, enforcing curbside parking and commercial ground transportation regulations, and performing airfield access gate controls and badge checks (a TCO is shown in Figure 7-1). TCOs are not licensed to carry a weapon, arrest individuals, intercede in fights or disputes among drivers or customers, or ticket moving vehicles. When enforcement of such actions is necessary, a TCO must request support from a LEO. At airports, TCOs may be employed directly by an airport operator or by a private contractor retained to enforce terminal curbside regulations, manage parking facilities, provide customer assistance, or perform other duties. When a private contractor is responsible for providing TCOs, often these services are included in a contract for broader services such as parking management.
Decisions regarding the assignment of LEOs and TCOs are influenced by differences in
The technology needed to support the enforcement of airport roadways and curbsides is rapidly improving and evolving. Some airports have started to explore the use of radar, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), license plate recognition (LPR), video processing, and other spatial sensing technologies that are employed to monitor traffic on highways and the use of curb spaces along urban streets. These technologies allow for the accurate tracking of the volumes, paths, and stopping locations of individual vehicles and pedestrians. Using these technologies, it is possible to determine when and where individual vehicles stop, monitor their dwell times, and inform officers of violators requiring attention in support of ticketing or administrative actions.
Such technologies allow for and support improved roadway curbside management, and, by potentially reducing the number of required officers, the efficient enforcement of these facilities. In some environments, such technology, supported by variable messaging signs, may replace enforcement staff during non-peak periods.
Airport operators seek to enhance the experience of their customers, including those who are dropping off and picking up passengers. They also seek to minimize traffic congestion and ensure that motorists can easily access curb spaces. The airport operator’s desire to enhance the experience of their customers may suggest allowing motorists to linger at the curbsides, even when they are not actively picking up a passenger. The desire to minimize traffic congestion may suggest strict enforcement of posted regulations (e.g., those prohibiting standing or parking) and ticketing or towing motorists violating these regulations. Lax enforcement of motorists can
“Being as polite as one can won’t make everyone happy. Drivers don’t have a choice; they can either move or be ticketed.”
result in traffic congestion and delays. Motorists subject to strict enforcement may complain to airport management (or others) about being unfairly “harassed.” To find a balance between these two extremes, airports can
The landside staff at Sacramento International Airport report they have had tremendous results when hiring traffic enforcement staff who have a customer service background versus a strictly security guard background. Staff with a customer service background are able to move traffic using a softer and more gentle approach. An example cited was to train civilian staff to tell motorists, “I need you to do XXX,” rather than to demand “You need to do XXX.”
Source: International Parking & Mobility Institute https://www.parking-mobility.org/2021/03/09/member-news-westward-industries-sfo/
It is recommended that airports enforce roadways, particularly curbside areas, consistently and actively throughout the entire day.
Consistent enforcement of curbside regulations, during both peak and non-peak periods, is necessary. A baseline of acceptable behavior is recommended. An example would be to not allow any vehicle to be unattended at any time, regardless of roadway conditions. This kind of “black and white” policy leaves no room for interpretation or negotiation. If motorists are allowed to linger at the curbside during off-peak periods when the curbside is virtually empty (or leave their vehicle unattended), they may fail to understand why the same behavior is considered unacceptable during peak periods. Experience suggests that motorists will argue with enforcement officers, explaining that they were allowed to park here recently and should be allowed to do so again. This can be particularly challenging at airports with pronounced peaks and periods when there are very few vehicles stopped at the curbside.
Active enforcement implies the visible and regular appearance of officers during peak and off-peak periods. Unfortunately, if officers are not present, some motorists will dwell at the curb for longer than necessary or attempt to leave their vehicles unattended. For example, if an officer is responsible for both curbside enforcement and patrolling inside the terminal (or performing some other non-curbside duty), the officer may tend to remain in the terminal when traffic is light. However, the officer’s absence will lead to motorists violating posted regulations and believing they can do so at other times.
Enforcement should be supplemented with well-placed signage with clear messaging. Airport curbsides are frequently inundated with static messaging signage. Dwell signage should be given priority and reflect the message enforcement officers will be communicating.
Summary—Enforcement of Airport Roadways and Curbsides
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | |||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | |||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Management of pedestrian movements is a critical part of managing roadside congestion. Pedestrians crossing roadways between parking facilities and the terminal or between terminal islands and the terminal exacerbate congestion and increase the risk of accidents with injuries on the roadways. The proper use of crosswalks is directly related to enforcement or perceived enforcement of pedestrians and motorists. In the absence of positive controls, pedestrians will tend to cross curbside (or other) roadways at will and possibly jaywalk, ignoring traffic rules and designated crosswalks. To enhance the safety of both pedestrians and motorists, airports install fences and other barriers to encourage pedestrian use of designated crosswalks. Requiring pedestrians to use crosswalks helps motorists to see and avoid crossing pedestrians while simultaneously looking for waiting passengers and empty curbside spaces and attempting to avoid other vehicles.
The need for traffic controls at crosswalks depends on the volume of pedestrians and vehicles, the width of the roadway, the adequacy of the pedestrian refuge area (to ensure waiting pedestrians do not spill into traffic lanes), and the ability of motorists to see pedestrians in the crosswalk (e.g., this can be affected by the level of illumination and nearby columns obstructing visibility). Crosswalks connecting terminal buildings and parking facilities typically have more pedestrian traffic than do those only connecting the terminal and a center-island curbside.
Vehicular traffic at pedestrian crosswalks located on curbside (or other) roadways can be uncontrolled or controlled using stop signs, pedestrian-actuated signals, or officers. Key aspects of these options are described in the following:
Salt Lake City International Airport has its crosswalk signals timed so that when the button is pressed, the lights turn red and a walk signal is displayed almost immediately, most of the time. Staff set a minimum green time (20 seconds) for cars. Airport staff report that this discourages jaywalking against the signal since pedestrians see lights changing as soon as they push the button.
Summary—Control of Crosswalks—Officers versus Signals
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Enforcement officers have several tools and technologies to manage curbside traffic. These include
Source: Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
Summary—Measures to Support Curbside Enforcement: Warning Messages, Ticketing, and Towing
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Effective curbside traffic management and enforcement requires that motorists be made aware that parking and standing are prohibited, and, further, that the signs prohibiting these actions be legally enforceable. Best practices for these signs include conformance with municipal or state vehicle codes. Normally, active loading and unloading at the curbside are permitted as long as the driver remains with the vehicle. Depending on the local codes, a sign that says
The signs typically contain text saying “No Standing or Parking” to ensure that they are enforceable. At some airports, curbside regulatory signs include supplementary text such as “No Unattended Vehicles,” “Do Not Leave Vehicle Unattended,” and “Tow-Away Zone,” as shown in Figure 7-8. The use of “Tow-Away Zone” is suggested only when tow trucks are available and used to support curbside enforcement.
These regulatory signs must be visible to motorists but mounted so as not to interfere with pedestrian circulation along the curbside sidewalk or those passengers boarding and alighting vehicles. FHWA’s Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices recommends that regulatory signs be placed 2 feet from the curbside face and that the bottom of the sign be a minimum of 5 feet above the sidewalk surface.
Source (top photos): Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport.
Summary—Regulatory Sign Placement and Conformance
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
These strategies are intended to reduce traffic on airport curbside and other roadways by diverting motorists to alternate drop-off and pickup sites, encouraging the use of high-occupancy travel modes, or limiting commercial vehicle operations. Many of these strategies help to manage traffic demands and improve roadway capacities by promoting use of underutilized areas or by limiting the time vehicles are allowed to remain on the curbside. These strategies include
One method of controlling traffic demand at the curbsides is to divert some commercial vehicles away from the terminal curbs to a remote location, which may include
Dwell times for TNC pickups can be longer than those for private vehicles due to the time needed for customers to find their driver, particularly during peak congested periods or at night.
This strategy locates TNC loading and/or unloading zones at a site(s) away from the terminal building curbsides but within walking distance of the terminal(s). The advantage of this strategy is that it diverts some vehicles away from the terminal curb roadway(s), reducing the overall demand for frequently congested areas. It can also improve the organization and allocation of commercial vehicle boarding areas, making it easier for customers to find the correct vehicle. While a remote location could provide for both passenger loading and unloading, only passenger boarding is provided at those airports with remote facilities; passenger unloading continues to occur at the terminal curbside. This is because it is simpler to identify, manage, and enforce regulations for TNCs picking up customers than doing so for TNCs dropping off customers. An example of an alternative TNC boarding area, LAX-it at Los Angeles International Airport, is shown in Figure 7-9.
Section 7.6 provides more detailed information on strategies to accommodate TNCs.
Another strategy is to divert all commercial vehicles to a ground transportation center located within walking distance of the terminal. This diverts traffic away from the terminal curb(s) and roadway. This strategy is particularly effective when there are numerous frequently or regularly scheduled commercial vehicles and limited terminal curb length. Delivery services and hotel/off-airport shuttle buses will require additional focus.
In congested terminal cores at large-hub airports, it may be desirable to develop a remote commercial vehicle boarding area (and potentially drop-off area) at a site that is not within walking distance of the terminal core. This requires that passengers be transported in shuttles or an APM between the remote boarding area and the terminal building(s). If the remote site provides for passenger drop-off, consideration should be given to providing remote baggage check-in facilities so passengers need not bring their checked baggage onto the shuttle or APM. (Currently, it is not practical to provide remote baggage claim facilities unless passengers are required to first claim and then re-check their baggage in the terminal.) Airports considering this approach should carefully consider both initial design and development costs as well as long-term operation and maintenance costs and the customer experience of those passengers required to use the shuttle/APM.
Summary—Moving Commercial Vehicle Passenger Boarding Areas to an Available Remote Location
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Curbside traffic demands can be controlled by diverting private vehicles from the terminal curb to a remote location. The remote pickup/drop-off area can be supplemental to the terminal curbside or replace the traditional terminal curb. An example of supplemental curbside is shown in Figure 7-10. Diversion of private vehicles to a remote location works well if it is an optional supplement to curbside drop-off and pickup, but this diversion may encounter resistance from customers if its use is mandatory.
This strategy requires consideration of unassisted walking distance and use of a shuttle or APM.
Private vehicle pickup and drop-off areas can be located within walking distance of the terminal doorway or entrance. By locating a parking facility adjacent to the terminal building, the need for a supplemental shuttle, moving walkway, or APM can be avoided. Passenger pickup and drop-off zones within a parking facility can be offered by charging customers
In congested terminal cores, it may be desirable to develop a remote private vehicle pickup/drop-off area that is within walking distance of the terminal(s), with passengers transported between the terminal and remote boarding area in shuttles or APMs. Airports considering this approach should carefully consider both initial design and development costs, long-term operation and maintenance costs, and the customer experience of those passengers required to use the shuttle/APM.
Summary—Moving Private Vehicle Pickup and/or Drop-Off Areas to an Available Remote Site
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Remote passenger curbs exist in various forms at different airports. Sometimes they are simply a “Kiss and Fly” curb for private vehicles, and other times, remote passenger curbs have a fully integrated commercial curb operation as well. Some examples follow:
Cell phone lots are free parking lots typically located along the approach to the terminal roadway or near the terminal, where motorists in private vehicles can wait for arriving passengers
to land and call for pickup. When adopted, they reduce the number of vehicles circulating on terminal loop roadways and reduce congestion along the arrivals curb. To encourage use of the cell phone lot, the cell phone lot should be planned considering the following:
The cell phone lot should be convenient to use and easily identifiable, with clear access points. Ideally, a cell phone lot would be located on the airport’s primary entry roadway or just adjacent to it. The cell phone lot should also provide waiting motorists convenient access to information regarding airline arrival status and updates on roadway congestion that can be communicated to passengers before they arrive at the curbs. This can be done with a dynamic sign located in advance of the cell phone lot and terminal curbs, access to an airport’s website, or by providing the toll-free telephone numbers of individual airlines.
Consider providing amenities for those utilizing cell phone lots. Amenities may include
Amenities encourage drivers to use the cell phone lot and wait there, rather than at the terminal curb.
Ensuring customer service and safety is paramount to encouraging cell phone lot use. Airport staff should ensure that
Summary—Encouraging the Use of Cell Phone Lots
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Nearly every medium- and large-hub airport in the United States has some form of a cell phone lot. Many larger small-hub airports also have them due to traffic congestion issues associated with outsized peaking that happens in the mornings for departures and in the evenings for arrivals. Cell phone lots (if positioned just off the entry roadway) can be very advantageous to airports looking to keep vehicles away from the curb. Some specific examples include the following:
ACRP Synthesis 62: Cell Phone Lots at Airports presents information about cell phone lots to help airport staff evaluate their benefits and costs.
There are multiple benefits resulting from increased use of hourly (or close-in) parking for passenger drop-off and pickup. The first is the additional revenue generated by customers. The second benefit is the reduced congestion at the terminal curb and on the terminal roadways. To encourage use of hourly parking airport managers should consider
To encourage use of hourly parking lots, airport staff should ensure that they are not prohibitively expensive. Lower prices, while generating lower revenues, may increase use of the parking facilities by motorists and, consequently, the effectiveness and efficiency of the roadway system. In some markets (i.e., those with significant curb congestion and/or low hourly lot usage), it may be appropriate to provide a grace period during which meeter/greeters would not be charged for using hourly parking or other facilities adjacent to the terminal building.
Parking areas intended to attract motorists dropping off and picking up passengers should be located close to the terminal to maximize their desirability. It is suggested that such parking areas be within a convenient walking distance (e.g., less than 500 feet), offer weather protection or climate controls, and be accessible to those with disabilities. It may be ideal to have the parking area equidistant to the arrival and departure doors or, in some instances, to have separate lots catering to arrivals and departures.
To encourage motorists dropping off or picking up passengers to use hourly parking facilities, it is suggested that airports consider providing amenities to attract customers including
Summary—Encouraging Motorists Dropping Off or Picking Up Passengers to Use Hourly Parking
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies:
Examples
Many airports operate their adjacent parking lots and/or the first level of garages as hourly lots for those motorists who prefer to park and accompany or meet passengers in the terminal or simply wait in the parking facility. Some examples include
ACRP Report 24: Guidebook for Evaluating Airport Parking Strategies and Supporting Technologies describes additional strategies and amenities to encourage the use of parking facilities.
There are multiple benefits resulting from the increased use of long-duration parking for passenger drop-off and pickup. The first is the additional revenue generated by customers. The second benefit is the reduced congestion at the terminal curb and on the terminal roadways. To encourage use of long-term parking consider
To encourage use of long-term parking facilities, airports should ensure that they are not prohibitively expensive. Lower prices, while generating lower revenues, may increase use of the long-term parking facility and, consequently, the effectiveness and efficiency of the roadway system. Adoption of a grace period for the long-term lot (such as 60 minutes) may encourage motorist use of long-term parking facilities and thereby reduce roadway traffic and congestion.
To encourage customer use of long-term parking facilities and to reduce roadway congestion, airport staff should ensure that customers can readily find available parking spaces and recognize the cost savings resulting from the use of long-duration facilities. Parking availability and rates should be communicated via airport websites, mobile applications, and signage displayed prior to the parking entrance. The facilities should utilize smart parking technologies to help drivers find parking spots efficiently. This may include use of the airport’s parking application and/or dynamic signage that indicates space availability by individual aisle and by space (i.e., single-space parking detection systems).
Customers can be encouraged to use long-term parking if they are provided quick and convenient access from the parking facility to the airport terminal. Where long-term parking is relatively close to the terminal, convenient access can be provided using elevated pedestrian bridges or tunnels incorporating moving walkways to reduce unassisted walking distances. Where the long-term parking facilities are located farther away from the terminal, convenient access can be provided using regular and frequent shuttle service (circulating within the parking facility) or APMs with stations integrated into the parking facility.
Summary—Encouraging Use of Long-Duration Parking Areas Rather than Drop-Off or Pickup at the Terminal Curbs
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Encouraging the use of transit and high-occupancy travel modes by passengers and employees working at the airport can be an effective way to manage traffic demand and reduce roadway congestion. Transit, including scheduled buses and trains, is capable of transporting many passengers and employees with minimal impact on roadways. There are many factors that impact the decision of passengers and employees to use transit or other high-occupancy travel modes including the availability of convenient transit at the non-airport trip end (i.e., near one’s place of residence or workplace), frequency of transit service, transit fares, and the familiarity of passengers and employees with transit service (and how to use it). However, airport staff can influence only a few of the factors affecting a passenger’s or employee’s decision to use transit or other high-occupancy travel mode. These factors include
The distances passengers—particularly passengers with several pieces of baggage or with large family groups—have to walk to/from a transit station or stop (at both ends of their trips) and the number of level changes they encounter influence their choice of access modes. Ideally, passengers would have a short walk from their transit station or stop to the airport security checkpoint and would not need to change levels. Passengers may be discouraged from using transit if they need to walk long distances, must change travel modes (i.e., use a bus or people mover to travel between the transit station and airport terminal), or if there is a fare for this intermediate/connecting mode.
To ensure that transit is easily identifiable at the airport, references to transit should be displayed on wayfinding signs, ensuring passengers can see the available transit services as well as the areas/destinations served, schedule, and fares. Non-resident passengers may be unfamiliar with destinations served, how to purchase a fare card, or the frequency of departures from the airport terminal. Passengers may be discouraged from using transit if they encounter long waits (e.g., a bus departing every 60 minutes).
To promote the use of transit, airport staff may wish to consider advertising the availability of transit service to/from the airport at the airport as well as at transit stations/stops throughout the region. These advertisements should describe the available schedules, routes, and prices to access the airport. Such advertisements may be beneficial during peak holiday seasons or summer vacations when there are more cost-sensitive, leisure passengers traveling through the airport.
Airport staff may wish to consider coordinating with local transit operators to allow passengers and employees to park at a discount rate to encourage the use of transit and reduce airport roadway congestion. Furthermore, the use of parking at transit centers allows these facilities to operate as off-airport parking lots, allowing passengers and employees to park off-airport and take transit to/from the airport.
Section 7.5.1. provides additional information regarding measures to encourage the use of transit or high-occupancy travel modes.
Summary—Encouraging the Use of Transit or High-Occupancy Travel Modes
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation describes programs to encourage the use of transit by airport passengers and employees.
By locating employee parking outside of the terminal area, airports can reduce traffic volumes and levels of congestion on the airport terminal area roads. Employees working for the airport, airlines, and other tenants may park away from the airport terminal and be transported in shuttles or APMs. In some cases, the airlines and other tenants lease space from an off-airport parking business and have their employees shuttled to/from the terminals.
Some airports require all persons working in the terminal area to park remotely except for airline station managers (or other selected senior staff) and employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection or other federal agencies.
Summary—Locating Employee Parking Outside of the Terminal Area
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
The airport operator may charge motorists in private vehicles fees to access the airport or specific portions of the airport such as the terminal curb or alternative drop-off or pickup area. This strategy can reduce terminal area traffic and roadway congestion by encouraging passengers traveling in private vehicles to be dropped off or picked up at a remote location or take a shared ride or transit to the airport. This strategy is best implemented in concert with other strategies, such as remote parking and providing good transit and/or high-occupancy vehicle service at the airport.
Summary—Charging Private Motorists Access Fees
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
The impacts of commercial ground transportation vehicles on terminal roadways can be managed by charging the operators of these vehicles higher fees for passenger drop-off or pickup in preferential areas and/or for use of the curbsides during peak periods of demand (or lower fees for the use of secondary drop-off or pickup areas). For example, TNCs, or other commercial ground transportation providers, entering premium curb space near the terminal building entrance during peak times could be charged a higher fee. Such strategies rely on the existence of preferential drop-off and pickup areas (i.e., those areas that customers and providers prefer) and a determination of peak demand times. The premium fee could be combined with a secondary passenger pickup site (or ground transportation center) to promote motorist use of a secondary location. In “Solving Airport Congestion Through Curb Pricing” (Medium, August 18, 2019, https://medium.com/p/62fb91e13751), Bakari Brock notes that in a pilot program at the San Francisco International Airport, a modest curb pricing fee for TNCs resulted in a 10% trip shift to less congested curbs. Increased fees suggested that this trip diversion could increase to 45%. While some TNC providers expressed support for such a program, it would require additional training and coordination to educate drivers and riders about the additional prices and the applicable times and areas.
Alternative strategies include (1) imposing demand management fees to limit the number of trips commercial ground transportation operators can make during a given period (e.g., per month) or (2) imposing interval or headway fees to limit the headways between successive vehicles that one provider operates. The use of interval or headway fees is intended to discourage “bump- and-run” operations whereby a commercial vehicle operator continuously has a courtesy vehicle parked at the terminal curbside.
Summary—Charging Commercial Vehicle Operators Headway Fees or Higher Fees for Curbside Pickup
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X |
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Section 7.3.7 provides additional information about the use of interval fees and other demand management fees to reduce excessive vehicle trips. Section 7.6 provides additional information about management of TNCs.
Airport terminal area roadways and curbsides are often space constrained (due to adjacent structures or facilities), limiting opportunities to use inexpensive solutions to address congestion. The following strategies are intended to improve operations and reduce congestion by using management tools to increase the available capacity of an existing roadway or curbside, thus avoiding or deferring large capital investments:
On curbside roadways, traffic controls at adjacent crosswalks are rarely coordinated, often causing motorists to stop at multiple crosswalks and leading to traffic congestion and delays. In addition, each crosswalk occupies one to three curb spaces (or between two to four curb spaces when there is a raised crosswalk or speed platform) assuming a single loading curbside (i.e., loading on passenger’s side only).
While removal of crosswalks can reduce roadway congestion and improve the available length of effective curb space, crosswalk removal should be supported by effective wayfinding signage in the terminal to guide passengers to the remaining walkways and by fences or other barriers to discourage jaywalking. In the absence of barriers and enforcement, many passengers will take the most direct path between a terminal doorway and their destination on a center-island curbside or a parking facility on the opposite side of the roadway.
Analyses of pedestrian circulation paths and volumes are often performed to determine which crosswalks to remove. These analyses may consider the
Construction of an elevated walkway above a curbside roadway or tunnel beneath the roadway allows for the removal of at-grade crosswalks. However, adding a grade-separated crossing to an existing terminal building is very expensive due to the costs of the enclosed, weather-protected bridge structure needed to span the roadway, or the costs of tunneling beneath an existing roadway, as well as the vertical circulation elements needed at both ends of the crossing (i.e., escalators plus elevators to accommodate passengers with wheeled baggage and disabilities). At airports having both at-grade crossings and grade-separated crossings, many pedestrians prefer to use the at-grade crossing rather than change building levels unless they are prevented from doing so (e.g., no visible doors leading into or out of the parking structure opposite the terminal).
Summary—Consolidating, Coordinating, or Removing Crosswalks
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
(Section 7.3.2 repeats much of the discussion in Section 7.1.2 because the strategy “control of crosswalks—officers versus signals” can be considered both an enforcement strategy and a congestion mitigation strategy.)
Vehicular traffic at pedestrian crosswalks located on curbside (or other) roadways can be uncontrolled or controlled using stop signs, pedestrian-actuated signals, or by officers. Key aspects of these options are described in the following:
Costs are a key consideration when evaluating the use of signs, signals, or officers to control crosswalks:
Summary—Changing Pedestrian Crosswalk Controls
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Raised crosswalks, also known as speed platforms, are traffic-calming devices that consist of a raised roadway section spanning the entire roadway width with sloping ramps for motorists approaching and leaving the raised section. The platform or crosswalk height is flush with the height of the adjacent sidewalks. The platform widths are designed so that the front and rear wheels of a vehicle are on top of the table at the same time, causing motorists to slow down.
The benefits of raised crosswalks include improved pedestrian safety because
In addition, raised crosswalks allow disabled pedestrians and those with wheeled baggage to avoid stepping down and up or navigating sloping ramps. Raised crosswalks address ADA requirements and assist passengers with wheeled baggage, eliminating the need for sloping ramps at either end of a crosswalk (although detectable warnings on both ends of a raised crosswalk are recommended).
The primary disadvantages of raised crosswalks are that they
An example of a raised crosswalk is portrayed in Figure 7-11.
Summary—Raised Crosswalk/Speed Platform
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Curbside traffic congestion can be managed and mitigated by modifying the location and/or amount of curb space assigned to each travel mode or transportation service. It is suggested that the allocation of curb space be reviewed regularly and adjusted as needed to reflect changes in traffic volumes, operations, and mix of vehicles. For example, a decline in the number of customers seeking on-demand taxicabs may warrant reducing the amount of curb space provided for waiting taxicabs and reallocating that space to a mode that has gained traffic over that time such as TNCs or rental car shuttles.
When allocating curb space, particularly the location and amount of space reserved for vehicles picking up passengers, airport managers consider the amount of curb space required by each travel mode or transportation service, the total amount of space required by all modes, and the total effective curb space available. They then prioritize the available space and assign space to each travel mode considering factors such as
The QATAR model described in this Guide can be used to test alternative curb space allocations and compare how they impact curbside roadway operations and service levels.
Summary—Revising the Location or Amount of Curb Space Allocated to Specific Mode(s)
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Curbside congestion can be reduced by right-sizing the amount of curb space allocated to taxicabs and other on-demand transportation services. The use of automated dispatching systems allows airports to reduce the space allocated to these services while maintaining desired customer service levels. The following paragraphs address the use of virtual queues and automated dispatching by airports to manage taxicab operations. Airports do not manage the dispatching of TNCs as each TNC controls its own virtual queue and automated dispatching system.
Automated taxicab dispatching and virtual queues replace traditional airport taxicab dispatching and starting. With traditional taxicab operations, drivers wait in hold lots (or staging areas) until airport staff or their representatives (e.g., a taxicab dispatcher) instruct the drivers to proceed to a passenger pickup zone, where the drivers wait in a queue until other airport staff (e.g., taxicab starters) assign them a waiting customer. Taxicab drivers frequently encounter long waits for airport customers, requiring airports to provide and maintain large hold lots to accommodate waiting taxicabs and provide restrooms, lounges, and other amenities desired by waiting drivers.
With a virtual queue, drivers using a smartphone can join a virtual queue of waiting taxicabs until they reach the head of the virtual queue. Depending on the size of the airport and the volume of taxicab activity, upon reaching the head of the virtual queue, drivers are instructed to proceed to
A virtual queue supplements, but does not replace, the taxicab dispatcher and starter. In contrast, an automated dispatch system is capable of replacing both the dispatcher and starter by (1) monitoring the number of taxicabs waiting at each passenger pickup area, and (2) as a taxicab exits the pickup area notifying the next driver waiting in the virtual queue to proceed directly to the passenger pickup area(s) or taxicab stack. The number of taxicabs waiting at each passenger pickup area can be adjusted to respond to anticipated or actual passenger demands.
For taxicab drivers, the benefits of a virtual queue are that it allows them, using a smartphone, to (1) determine the number of taxicabs waiting for airport passengers ahead of them and estimate their wait time, (2) make an informed decision about when to work and join the queue if they choose to, (3) monitor their place in the queue, and (4) proceed to the airport when they approach the head of the queue.
For airport management, one benefit of a virtual queue is that it allows the taxicab hold lot to be drastically reduced in size or to be removed or used for other purposes. The additional benefits of an automated dispatch system are that it allows management to (1) minimize the curb space allocated for taxicab pickups while ensuring there are sufficient waiting taxis to accommodate arriving passengers; (2) reduce labor costs; and (3) better control short trips, pre-arranged pickups, and other non-standard fares.
Virtual queues and automated taxicab dispatch systems require the acquisition of a ground transportation management system (GTMS). Automated dispatch systems require vehicle detectors (e.g., gate arms, induction loops, Bluetooth, radio-frequency identification, or cameras) to be installed at the passenger boarding area to monitor the arrival and departure of authorized vehicles. Generally, airports either purchase off-the-shelf automated dispatch systems (which can be an add-on feature of an existing GTMS) or custom-built systems. Both require the preparation of requests for qualifications (RFQs) or requests for proposals (RFPs). Prior to issuing the RFQ or RFP, it is recommended that airport management
Examples of automated dispatch displays are shown in Figure 7-12.
Summary—Implementing Virtual Taxicab Queue/Automated Taxicab Dispatching
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | |||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Source: Parkway Airport Services, November 2021
As described in prior chapters, weaving occurs when traffic on two roads traveling in the same direction crosses, requiring vehicles to merge and diverge in close proximity in order to execute lane changes. (Chapter 4 describes low-speed weaving operations on airport roadways and the use of QATAR to analyze these operations.) Congestion and delays occur when the volume of weaving traffic exceeds the capacity of the weaving segment, causing queues to form on the approach lanes.
The key factors determining the capacity of a weaving segment include the volume and speed of the weaving traffic, the number of lane changes needed, and the length of the weaving segment. Reducing roadway congestion in a weaving segment requires modifying one or more of these factors by
Summary—Modifying/Lengthening Weaving Area
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
At some airports, operators of commercial ground transportation vehicles are charged fees (or fines), often referred to as demand management fees, in order to reduce roadway and curbside congestion. These fees are intended to
Non-essential trips include those made by the operators of courtesy vehicles seeking to advertise or market their services by (1) circulating repeatedly past the terminal building curbsides or (2) ensuring that one of their courtesy vehicles is stopped at the curbside at all times (i.e., operating in a “bump-and-run” manner so that a vehicle remains at the curb until a subsequent vehicle arrives).
To reduce traffic congestion, encourage efficient use of the passenger pickup areas, and achieve other goals, airport managers
These restrictions require the use of GTMSs to monitor (1) the length of time vehicles remain at the boarding areas, (2) the volume of courtesy vehicle trips, (3) the time between successive courtesy vehicles, and (4) provide a basis for calculating fines or penalties. Monitoring dwell times requires vehicle detectors or antennae to be installed at the entrance and exit of the passenger boarding area. Only a single vehicle detector or antennae is required to monitor the number of monthly vehicle trips or the time interval between vehicles.
At some airports, rental car companies and other courtesy vehicle operators ignore these management fees in order to maintain corporate-mandated customer service levels. These companies consider the cost of dwell time fees and/or interval fees part of the “normal cost of doing business” at the airport and pay the associated fees. At these airports, dwell time and interval fees have proven to be less effective in achieving management’s objectives.
Summary—Charging Commercial Vehicles for Excessive Number of Trips or Dwell Times
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Curbside congestion can hypothetically be reduced by implementing a space management system (using overhead detectors or cameras) similar to those utilized in “smart” parking garages. With this strategy, the signal or sign would note which spaces on the curb are available or are occupied to vehicles some distance away from approaching vehicles. Similar systems have been tested in urban areas (e.g., SFpark)
Use of space detectors could pose challenging if (1) the curbside boarding spaces are not clearly delineated (or striped) causing the signals not to detect stopped vehicles, and/or (2) use of the spaces is not actively enforced. An additional caveat to this system is the lack of control over the driver’s instinctive behaviors, such as double- and triple-parking or clustering at the perceived “closest” door for the exiting or arriving passenger.
Summary—Using Space Detectors Supplemented by Flashing Beacons to Encourage Efficient Use of Curb Space
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | |||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Congestion on a linear (vehicles parked nose-to-tail) curbside roadway, particularly at pickup curbsides, can be reduced by using alternative curbside configurations such as angled or sawtooth spaces (either pull-through or back-out) or by allowing double-parking. These configurations can increase curb capacity, reduce passenger walking distances, and support enforcement.
Angled curbside spaces can (1) improve vehicle efficiency (i.e., the number of vehicles accommodated per square foot) compared with a linear curbside having three or more parallel lanes and (2) reduce passenger walking distances because more vehicles can be accommodated in the same curbside length. Airport curbsides can be configured using angled pull-through spaces or angled back-out spaces. An example configuration for angled pull-through spaces is shown in Figure 7-15.
To accommodate angled pull-through spaces, the curbside roadway needs to be at least 60 feet in width (the equivalent of about five parallel lanes). This provides sufficient width for the pull-through spaces plus at least one through lane for vehicles entering the spaces and a second through lane for vehicles exiting the spaces. Angled back-out spaces require approximately the same width because at least two through lanes are needed behind the spaces to allow motorists to back out safely. An example configuration of angled back-out spaces is shown in Figure 7-16.
There are challenges associated with pull-through and back-out spaces. The challenges with pull-through spaces include (1) the need for exiting vehicles to cross the paths of passengers walking between stopped vehicles and the terminal and (2) the tendency of motorists who are waiting for an empty space to double-park and possibly block through traffic. When double-parking is allowed to occur, vehicle queues can quickly form if other motorists cannot bypass the stopped vehicles. The challenge with back-out spaces is that drivers must back out into an active roadway while their ability to see oncoming traffic is constrained (i.e., they must back out into a blind spot), compromising roadway safety. Thus, both angled pull-through and back-out spaces
are more commonly found at passenger drop-off and pickup areas used exclusively by commercial ground transportation vehicles (e.g., a ground transportation center) or in a repurposed parking area.
Sawtooth spaces allow buses and other large vehicles to park immediately adjacent to a curbside allowing passengers to step directly to/from the parked vehicle when boarding and alighting. A sawtooth space is shorter than the length of the space these vehicles require when parking along a traditional linear curbside. The disadvantages of sawtooth spaces are (1) the lack of flexibility—a space accommodates a single vehicle regardless of the vehicle’s size whereas smaller vehicles require less linear curbside; and (2) like angled spaces, the delays to traffic in through lanes if vehicles waiting to enter a sawtooth space are allowed to double-park.
A double-wide lane is a curbside lane that is 20 to 24 feet wide (the equivalent of two travel lanes) separated by distinct pavement marking or striping from the adjacent through lanes. Motorists are allowed to double-park on the terminal side of a pavement marking but only moving traffic is allowed in the through lanes. Double-wide lanes facilitate enforcement by allowing double-parking in the designated area while discouraging motorists from blocking through lanes. A concern with double-wide lanes is that motorists loading or unloading adjacent to the curbside or inner lane can be “trapped” by vehicles stopped in the outer lane. As a result, motorists tend to only stop in the outer lane, leaving the inner curbside lane under-utilized.
Summary—Alternative Curbside Layouts Including the Use of Sawtooth or Angled Spaces, Pull-Through Spaces, or Permitting Double-Parking
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | X |
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Curbside congestion can be improved by revising roadway and curbside signage and wayfinding messages both by revising overhead signs and those mounted adjacent to roadways (i.e., column-mounted signs and graphics). Additionally, roadway signage that adds clarity via colors and clear messaging to better assist with the allocation of curbs and available spaces will
benefit drivers who are already distracted by surrounding congestion. Roadway signage is most effective if the message starts before the vehicle enters the decision-making zone and is part of and consistent with the airport’s signage and wayfinding master plan. Too many signs can lead to visual clutter, distract motorists, and make it challenging to find key signs. For this reason, advertisement or promotional banners are discouraged on airport roadways as such messaging can distract from directional and regulatory messages.
ACRP Report 52: Wayfinding and Signing Guidelines for Airport Terminals and Landside provides guidelines on the use, location, and design of signs including technologies, fonts, colors, and sizes. As noted in this resource, signs can be mounted on free-standing poles, overhead structures, or structural columns, or be displayed using column wraps or pavement markings.
Summary—Revising Roadway and Curbside Signage/Wayfinding
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | X | ||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Curbside congestion can be reduced by airport staff by modifying the placement and/or use of regulatory and warning signs, but only if the message is supported by active and consistent enforcement. If private vehicle use of portions of the curbside is restricted, adjacent signage clearly identifying curbside availability and access should be provided.
Summary—Modifying Placement or Use of Regulatory and Warning Signs
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Variable message signs can be used to balance demand among available curbside areas by directing arriving motorists to less busy curbside levels (if the peak periods of demand for these curbsides do not coincide). Implementation requires placing variable message signs (using either permanently mounted or temporary trailer-mounted signs) on the approach roadways to inform entering motorists about the availability of alternative drop-off or pickup areas. An example of this is shown in Figure 7-19.
Web-based information about parking availability can be used to supplement variable message roadway signs and encourage motorists to use adjacent parking structures or surface lots.
Summary—Using Variable Message Signs to Encourage/Direct Traffic to Less Busy Curbsides
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | X |
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Source: Sacramento International Airport.
It is important for an airport to provide good customer service because a customer’s first and last experiences at the airport are usually the most memorable. The strategies discussed in this section are focused on reducing roadway and curbside congestion and encouraging the use of transit and high-occupancy vehicles by improving customer experience. The strategies are
The customer experience of passengers waiting to be picked up can be enhanced by providing climate-controlled waiting areas that include seating, heating, and other amenities. These shelters can be located both at terminal curbsides and at remote/consolidated facilities. These shelters protect
passengers from the elements while providing centralized locations that increase the efficiency of the curb.
Key considerations related to implementing passenger waiting enclosures include
The shelters should be near pickup locations—particularly on uncovered roadways—serving regularly scheduled buses, courtesy vehicles, and on-demand vehicles that are not standing at the curbsides such as taxicabs or TNCs. (Generally, shelters are not required at taxicab stands as normally there is a queue of waiting taxicabs, eliminating the need for passengers to wait for arriving vehicles.) Passengers waiting in the shelter should be able to clearly see approaching vehicles and other portions of the curbside. Depending on the curb length and number of areas allocated to buses, courtesy vehicles, and TNCs, one shelter positioned at a central location or several evenly spaced locations may be needed to minimize walking distances and provide sightlines. Generally, shelters should be located at least 3 feet back from the curb face, with a minimum setback of 10 feet from any crosswalks. Shelter locations should be evaluated for their impact on pedestrian traffic in the surrounding area.
Shelters should provide weather protection against wind, snow, and blowing rain, with heating provided in some climates. Shelter sizes vary based on anticipated peak-period occupancy (i.e., occupancy depends on the estimated number of peak-period passengers waiting concurrently at each shelter for buses, courtesy vehicles, and TNCs) and the local climate. Shelters in more extreme climates need to provide greater capacity than those in more temperate climates due to the proportion of passengers expected to wait inside the structures. Additional guidelines may be available from local transit codes. Climate-controlled waiting areas should contain seating, with additional amenities considered to improve customer experience, including
Shelters should be properly maintained to maintain desired levels of customer experience. Maintenance includes regular cleanings that avoid peak periods of use and upkeep to address general wear and tear on a monthly or annual basis. (Every customer service enhancement must be kept in working order and properly maintained or the amenity may negatively impact customer experience.) Any equipment associated with safety and security must be kept in working order as non-working equipment reflects a significant liability to the airport.
Summary—Providing Convenient, Enclosed, Passenger Waiting Areas
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | |||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
It is helpful to display the expected arrival times of buses and airport shuttles to passengers awaiting these vehicles. Doing so improves the customer experience and reduces their anxieties. Key considerations related to informing waiting passengers include
Source: Rob Stapleton, Jr. / Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport
Source: https://www.flystl.com/, screen capture: May 16, 2022.
At key locations on the curb, message signs can be installed displaying regularly scheduled route and shuttle information. These can be standard static informational signs or dynamic displays, showing the arrival time of the next bus (or shuttle) and route information/destinations served. Some airports have found it beneficial to provide a web application, or “app,” that includes detailed information about the ground access system, including information on parking occupancy and schedules for regular ground access services, such as scheduled buses, courtesy shuttles, and public transit. St. Louis Lambert International Airport shows current parking availability, shown in Figure 7-22.
These applications can also display the same real-time data as the dynamic signage along with live global positioning system (GPS) tracking on a map showing the location of shuttles, as shown in Figure 7-23.
Staffed or automated customer service kiosks, located at the curbside or within the baggage claim areas, can be used to provide passengers with information such as schedules, fares, and destinations served by transit services and scheduled buses. Staff at these kiosks can also provide other information about the airport and its airlines, provide directions, and respond to questions from passengers and visitors. Indeed, most of the questions that the staff at ground transportation desks receive do not pertain to the airport’s ground transportation services.
It is important to maintain up-to-date information on transit and scheduled bus schedules and fares, particularly at airports with significant seasonal traffic and where transit schedules and services vary accordingly. This applies to both static and dynamic information sources, but dynamic displays are more easily updated. Airport staff should regularly contact transit authorities, scheduled bus operators, and other providers to ensure that all information is current. Information should be automated where possible to remove the opportunity for human error.
Summary—Informing Waiting Passengers of Bus and Shuttle Arrival Times
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
It is helpful to provide arriving passengers with information describing the departure times/schedules, fares, routes, and destinations served by public transit and scheduled buses at the airport.
Source: slcairport.ridesystems.net, screen capture: May 16, 2022.
This information is particularly useful to non-resident passengers not familiar with the community. Other helpful information may include instructions on how to purchase a ticket/fare card.
Key considerations related to informing arriving passengers include:
At key locations on the curb, airports should provide displays containing fare and schedule information for scheduled routes. These can be standard signs or dynamic signs, showing the next arrival time and route. Some airports may find it beneficial to develop and provide a web application that includes detailed information on their ground access system, including information on schedules and fares for regular ground access services such as scheduled buses and rail services and regional shuttles.
Staffed or automated customer service kiosks placed in the baggage claim, curbside, or other areas can assist passengers by providing a variety of information, including regularly scheduled service information. Staffed or automated kiosks have higher costs than static displays, but they are more flexible and can provide a greater amount of information.
Efforts should be made to maintain current information on schedules, fares, and routes/destinations, particularly at airports with significant seasonal traffic. Airports should regularly engage with operators of privately operated, scheduled bus service and public transit agencies to ensure that all information is current. Information displays should be automated where possible to remove the opportunity for human error.
Summary—Presenting Transit Schedules, Fares, and Route Information to Passengers
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Airports that have implemented these strategies include:
Prioritizing customer service by assigning airport representatives, such as guest service ambassadors, to the curbsides can increase the level of customer satisfaction. Staff may be airport staff, volunteers, or contracted. These representatives can (1) assist passengers with loading and unloading at the curb to gain efficiencies, (2) provide directions to support nearby signage or direct passengers to information displays, and (3) assist passengers with special needs or mobility challenges. There are a number of considerations that airports need to address when establishing guest services or ambassadors:
Airport representatives may perform many customer service tasks, including
As with all customer service positions, particular care should be taken to ensure airport representatives have sufficient and recurrent training. Training should include ADA assistance, security
and safety standards, impacts of construction, seasonal changes impacting travelers, and participation in emergency drills (performing crowd control and working with enforcement officers and emergency services). Standard operating procedures should be documented by the airport and should be shared with tenants such as airlines and rental car agencies to ensure consistency and the highest level of customer service.
Consideration should be given to the liabilities associated with the tasks assigned to the airport representatives. Careful consideration should be given to the level of assistance being provided to disabled patrons and whether employees of the airport can physically touch a passenger’s belongings.
The costs of providing guest services/airport representatives vary based on the number of employees needed. Some airports have outsourced this service by retaining a third-party contractor to provide and manage their curbside customer service representatives.
Summary—Providing Passenger Service Associates at Curbsides
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | |||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Airports with multiple curbs or with parking facilities within walking distance may have pedestrian crossings on roadways. Enhancements start with effective wayfinding inside the airport and on the curbs. Proper crossings lead to more effective curbside roadways and increased passenger satisfaction, convenience, and safety. Some areas to consider are the following:
As a general rule, pedestrian crossings and the areas leading up to them should be well lit and provide motorists with clear views of pedestrians and pedestrians with clear views of approaching vehicles. Roadways being crossed should also be well lit, allowing pedestrians ample time to assess traffic situations.
Various types of traffic controls are available to assist in pedestrian crossings. These include signage, signaling, and staffed crossings. More information on each of these types of controls and their effect on congestion are available in Section 7.3.2. Identifying the appropriate type of control is essential to balancing pedestrian and curb roadway levels of service, ensuring safe and efficient use.
Pedestrian crossings should be appropriately sized, generally in the range of 8 to 12 feet wide, to ensure crossings are safe and predictable. Crossings should be wide enough to accommodate
peak pedestrian traffic levels without unreasonable vehicle stoppage time, but not so wide that drivers have difficulty identifying pedestrians entering the walkway.
Grade-separated pedestrian crossings can improve customer experience and safety by separating pedestrians from the roadway. While grade-separated crossings allow for continuous flows of traffic and pedestrians without the risk of interaction, they are costly to construct and may not be appropriate for curbs of all passenger activity levels or terminal building configurations. Raised crosswalks/speed platforms are described in Section 7.3.3.
Summary—Enhancing Safety and Convenience for Pedestrians Crossing Roadways and Waiting for Transportation
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Many airports throughout the United States have different strategies:
Sustainability strategies strive to reduce or eliminate carbon emissions generated by landside traffic. These strategies include
Curbside traffic congestion can be mitigated (1) by increasing the number of passengers using high-occupancy modes, which reduces the number of vehicles using curbside facilities, or (2) by moving traffic to drop-off and pickup sites located outside of congested areas, such as a remote lot or drop-off point. Policies to encourage passenger use of high-occupancy modes typically focus on making those services more attractive to passengers and/or making lower-occupancy modes (i.e., services carrying a single passenger or travel party) less attractive. For this discussion, high-occupancy modes are those that (1) carry passengers who otherwise would not be traveling together in a single vehicle and (2) provide transportation for passengers who typically do not consider alternative modes, such as charter buses or courtesy vehicles operated by off-airport parking facilities, hotels/motels, and rental car operators. Therefore, services addressed in this section include
ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation and ACRP Report 35: Planning for Offsite Airport Terminals provide further information on strategies to improve use of public transit and offsite passenger terminals by airport passengers and employees.
The following strategies can increase the attractiveness of high-occupancy modes for airline passengers:
Airline passenger use of high-occupancy access modes could be increased by decreasing the relative attractiveness of lower-occupancy modes that use the curbsides. Some strategies are
Section 7.2.6. provides additional information regarding measures to encourage the use of transit or high-occupancy travel modes.
Summary—Encouraging the Use of Transit or High-Occupancy Travel Modes
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
Many airports promote use of high-occupancy modes by airline passengers. Some examples follow:
Curbside traffic congestion can be mitigated by increasing the number of passengers using long-duration parking facilities, which reduces the number of vehicles using curbside facilities. Furthermore, if passengers choose to use long-duration parking facilities instead of using curbside pickup and drop-off modes, the number of vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled associated with their air trip can be cut in half. Long-duration parking also typically can generate more net revenue per passenger than pickup and drop-off modes.
ACRP Report 24: Guidebook for Evaluating Airport Parking Strategies and Supporting Technologies provides further information on products and strategies to improve the attractiveness of on-airport, long-duration parking facilities.
Policies to encourage passenger use of long-duration parking focus on either making long-duration parking more attractive to passengers and/or making curbside pickup and drop-off modes less attractive.
The following strategies can increase the attractiveness of on-airport, long-duration parking options for airline passengers:
Airline passenger use of long-duration parking could be increased by strategies to decrease the relative attractiveness of curbside pickup/drop-off options:
Section 7.2.5. provides additional information regarding measures to encourage the use of long-duration parking areas rather than drop-off or pickup at the terminal curbs.
Summary—Encouraging Use of Long-Duration Parking Rather Than Drop-Off or Pickup Modes
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
To reduce emissions of vehicles traveling to and from the airport, an airport operator can take action to encourage airport passengers and commercial vehicle operators to purchase electric vehicles (EVs) and use them for airport access. EV charging infrastructure is lagging far behind demand. Providing EV charging services impacts sustainability goals, revenue generation, and the traveler experience. Such actions include
ACRP Synthesis 54: Electric Vehicle Charging Stations at Airport Parking Facilities provides further information on the technologies, business and policy issues, and planning considerations for airports considering EV chargers.
Summary—Promoting Use of Electric Vehicles by Private Motorists and Others
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | X | X | ||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | |||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
To accommodate the growing number of passengers using TNCs, airports have implemented strategies to facilitate TNC operations while minimizing the adverse impacts TNCs may have on airport roadway and curbside operations. Such strategies need to accommodate the changing needs of passengers, TNCs, and other ground transportation providers, as well as airport management. Solutions to mitigate TNC contributions to roadway operations and congestion require balancing the impacts on airport operations and traveler experiences and include
Geofencing is a technology that creates a virtual boundary around a defined geographic area allowing the detection of vehicles entering and exiting the geofenced area via GPS signals from a mobile phone or other device. The signals can be used to monitor and record the time, location, and travel direction of individual vehicle trips. Using these data, it is possible to record the volume of vehicle trips (to support charging per-trip fees, facility planning, or other purposes), ensure that only drivers waiting in hold sites receive dispatches, enforce and audit operations, and perform other tasks.
Airport geofences rely on signals from drivers’ telephones. TNC drivers are incentivized to keep their phones on in order to be dispatched to customers. Geofences are less practical for managing courtesy vehicles, shuttles, taxicabs, and other vehicles as the drivers of these vehicles need not keep their telephone turned on to pick up customers or do business.
It is recommended that as part of their permitting process airports require TNCs to define geofences around the entire airport, designated hold lots, and assigned TNC customer drop-off and pickup areas. Use of these geofences:
TNC drivers waiting for customers should be required to remain in hold lots that are located near designated passenger boarding areas so that drivers can respond promptly to customer
requests, but the hold lots should be located away from the terminal curb and congested roadway areas. At most airports, TNCs are provided hold areas that are separated from those provided to waiting taxicabs and other providers of commercial ground transportation.
At many airports, TNC drivers remain in the hold lot for less than 30 minutes. At airports where driver wait times frequently exceed 60 minutes, it is recommended that airport staff work cooperatively with the TNCs to discourage long wait times. This is because long waits frequently result in driver requests for restrooms, Wi-Fi, vehicle charging, vending machines, and other amenities.
While curbside drop-off and pickup may provide the best customer experience, at some airports TNC boarding occurs at remote sites (i.e., not immediately adjacent to the terminal building). Airport staff require remote boarding of TNCs (and other vehicles) to mitigate roadway and curbside congestion. Typically, these prohibitions do not apply to TNC-affiliated vehicles operating as licensed limousines (e.g., Uber Black). Examples of airports where TNCs are precluded from picking up customers at the terminal curbside include
TNC services to airports include individual; small party; and shared ride, matched door-to-door transportation (similar to a carpool). In markets with high TNC adoption rates, TNCs appear to be mostly used by single-party or individual users. Many of these users appear to have
Source: Massport
Source: Portland International Airport.
come from shared-ride modes, which has resulted in increases in curbside congestion. Encouraging passenger use of pooling by TNC customers or matched door-to-door transport (e.g., UberX Share and Lyft Line) can result in an 11% reduction in the number of trips to an airport, thereby reducing curb congestion (K. Hermawan, “Transportation Network Companies’ (TNC) Impacts and Potential on Airport Access,” 2018. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/01m726rr). Achieving success with these programs would require coordination with TNCs and perhaps offering reduced per-trip fees to promote pooling.
Some airports allow TNC drivers to be dispatched to a waiting customer immediately after dropping off a customer (i.e., pre-dispatched). Pre-dispatching is used where customer drop-off occurs immediately prior to and on the same curbside roadway as customer pickup. Pre-dispatching improves the efficiency of TNC operations, leading to reduced roadway traffic volumes, and improved customer service (i.e., reduced wait times).
Airports have tested pricing strategies that charge TNCs higher per-trip fees for the use of premium boarding areas (e.g., the terminal curbside) than they are charged for the use of an alternate boarding area (e.g., a nearby parking structure).
As part of a March 2019 pilot program at San Francisco International Airport, TNCs were charged a $3.00 price differential: $5.00 for use of the premium curbside boarding area versus $2.00 for use of the adjacent parking structure. This pricing strategy resulted in a 10% trip shift
in TNC traffic from the terminal curbside to the remote boarding area. The differential pricing program at San Francisco International Airport was canceled after 3 months. While some TNCs have expressed support for such a differential fee program, successful implementation requires informing drivers and customers (many of whom travel from the airport infrequently) about the available benefits (reduced costs and potentially lower waiting times) as well as the inconvenience associated with longer walks.
It can be difficult for TNC customers to identify their drivers and for drivers to spot their customers. This can be a particular challenge when the curbside sidewalk and/or roadway is congested, at night if the roadway is poorly lit, or during inclement weather conditions. Identifying a vehicle can be challenging because many drivers operate cars that appear similar in shape and color. While the TNC app shows customers the license plate number of their driver’s vehicle, it can be difficult for customers to read the plate as the vehicle approaches or while it is stopped between other vehicles.
While normally TNC dwell times are shorter than those of private vehicles, TNCs can experience longer dwell times when customers cannot find their driver or when drivers must call their customers to indicate the vehicle’s location. These increased dwell times can contribute to and aggravate curbside congestion. Recognizing these challenges, TNCs and airport operators have developed and tested several solutions:
Airport staff could require TNCs to implement these or other solutions to improve customer and driver matching. Solutions that require providing all drivers with displays or other hardware may be challenging for TNCs to implement due to the frequent turnover of TNC drivers.
All major TNCs have implemented programs intended to reduce customer wait times for drivers and reduce curbside traffic volume. While Uber and Lyft both have similar programs, they refer to these programs using different names. Some of the programs include
A comparison of the different dispatching programs is shown in Table 7-1.
Table 7-1. Dispatching programs.
| Dispatch type | Minimizes wait times? | Minimizes deadheading? | Allows dispersed pickup points? |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Standard/waiting lot |
N/A - Default Dispatch Type |
||
|
Rematch |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
Prematch/predispatch |
Yes | No | Yes |
|
Expressmatch/tiered queues |
Yes |
Yes (with Rematch enabled) |
Yes |
|
PIN dispatch |
Yes |
Yes (with Rematch enabled) |
No (PIN dispatch requires a single consolidated pickup point) |
Summary—Accommodating Transportation Network Companies
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples
AVs automate certain driving systems that do not require human input. SAE International has defined six levels of autonomy for vehicles, from Level 0 (no automation) to Level 5 (where the steering wheel becomes optional for the vehicle). The trend in car manufacturing is to achieve Level 5 autonomy for vehicles, where the steering wheel becomes optional. It is also anticipated that AVs will be electrically powered in the future.
At the time this research was conducted, multiple companies were testing AVs on public roads, but the timeline for the rollout of customer-ready AVs and widespread adoption of these vehicles continues to be uncertain. However, some researchers anticipate that
The term AV, as used in this report, includes connected vehicles. Whereas AVs may be able to operate solely based on in-vehicle technologies, connected vehicles may operate driverless but do so based on communications with other vehicles, roadways, roadside infrastructure, and other elements.
In addition to traditional ground transportation modes, AVs are expected to facilitate the development of new access services, such as mobility as a service (MaaS). MaaS is the offering of multiple forms of transportation, such as TNCs, taxicabs, car sharing, car rentals, and public transit through a single gateway, such as a mobile application, and payment system. MaaS also allows travelers to seamlessly plan, book, and pay for multimodal travel. The introduction of AVs, which could allow a single vehicle to operate as more than one of those services (i.e., operate as a car-sharing company on one trip and as a TNC on the next), is expected to advance the transition to MaaS because it may blur the distinctions between traditional modes.
As of 2022, AVs are still being developed, and operations on public roadways are limited to vehicles being tested by system developers or vehicle manufacturers. Although the timeline for AV development and deployment is uncertain, once AVs do appear on airport roadways and curbsides, there will be a multi-year period where both AVs and human-driven vehicles are
operating on-airport; however, AV operations may be limited to certain conditions or within limited geographic areas. Therefore, the strategies presented here for accommodating AVs on airport curbsides focus on this transition period.
As AVs are currently still in the development and testing stage, their ability to interact with non-AVs is currently unknown. Given that airport curbside operations can be less predictable and more chaotic than typical on-street or highway operations (i.e., high turnover of vehicle loading/unloading spaces, frequent lane changes, frequent pedestrian/vehicle interactions, vehicles stopped in travel lanes or double-parked), it is possible that an AV’s ability to successfully navigate the environment may be compromised. This uncertainty may be compounded in that the operation of traditional vehicles or non-AV operations on an airport curbside (e.g., double-parking, very low travel speeds as drivers search for waiting passengers) are often significantly different than typical street traffic. It is currently unknown how an AV will operate in atypical circumstances that could fall outside of the AV’s normal operating parameters. Therefore, to ensure the safety of pedestrians and motorists and to minimize potential disruptions, airports may wish to separate AVs from non-AVs—particularly at passenger drop-off and pickup areas. This separation could be accomplished by (1) designating passenger drop-off and pickup areas (such as an island curb or zones within a parking facility) for exclusive use by AVs and (2) designating paths (potentially using roadways less frequented by non-AVs) that AVs must follow while on airport property.
Even prior to the operation of AVs on an airport’s roadways, airport management can update its rules and regulations so that AV-related elements are in place prior to AVs appearing in noticeable numbers. It is anticipated that federal, state, and other local jurisdictions, rather than airport operators, will provide the primary guidelines regarding the operations of AVs on public roadways and will address elements related to safety, vehicle licensing, insurance, liability, and law enforcement ability to control AVs as part of their traffic control and security role (i.e., the ability to quickly remove an empty AV from a curbside or other sensitive location). However, it is assumed that an airport will incorporate AV-related elements into its general rules regarding on-airport traffic operations as well as into its rules, regulations, and business arrangements with commercial ground transportation providers. AV-related items could include identification of operating areas (including required travel paths), dwell time limits on curbside or other designated passenger loading and unloading areas, rules regarding use of hold lots or other staging facilities, data-sharing requirements for AV operators, sustainability requirements for companies conducting business on airport property using AVs, and AV and passenger interactions with law enforcement (such as the ability to relocate/impound AVs that violate airport-specific rules and regulations).
Despite uncertainty regarding the development and adoption of AVs, airports may wish to start adjusting their infrastructure to facilitate AV operations. It is likely that the FHWA will establish national standards regarding traffic control devices that support AV operations. On-airport public roadways will likely need to incorporate those standards. Such standards are expected to focus on pavement markings and traffic signals but will likely not deviate significantly from existing
standards as long as human drivers continue driving on the same facilities. An early example of such standards is the 2018 adoption in California of 6-inch-wide lane striping (increased from 4 inches) to accommodate AVs.
To support on-airport AV operations, an airport may need to implement connected-vehicle infrastructure that would allow the roadway or parking facility to share information with individual AVs. Such information could include information on traffic conditions; alternative routes; and drop-off, pickup, and staging facility availability.
Airports should consider AVs when reconditioning parking facilities and roadways.
Summary—Accommodating Autonomous Vehicles
Intended Goals
Applicability
Estimated Costs
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | X | X | ||||
| <$10K | $10K to $50K | $50K to $100K | $100K to $500K | $0.5M to $1M | $1M to $5M | >$5M |
| X | ||||||
Implementation Considerations
The actions described in this section related to accommodating AVs on airport roadways and curbsides are non-specific and will likely be highly dependent on the physical configuration of an airport’s roadways, its operating conditions, and its regulatory environment. Therefore, known implementation considerations are limited to
Complementary Strategies and Supporting Technologies
Examples