Previous Chapter: Appendix B: Sensor Design
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.

APPENDIX C
Field Testing

The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) kindly allowed the research team to conduct field tests at their facilities. The team travelled to the SEPTA facility twice, to conduct preliminary measurements and final testing.

C.1 Testing Site

The tests were taken at the Upper Darby SEPTA facility. The mapping of the site is shown in Figure C.1.

Two sections of track were used for testing. These sections were electrically isolated from the rest of the track. The first section of the track was 306 ft in length and connected electrically through cabling to the second section. The second section was measured to be 318 ft in length. In total, the track section under the test consisted of 624 ft of rail. Figure C.2 shows the picture of the sections, while the focused portion of the third rail and the track are shown in Figure C.3.

During one of the visits, the dimensions of the third-rail line were measured to enable the researchers to model the power lines accurately. The pictures presented in Figure C.4 show the dimensions of the third rail.

Figure C.5 shows the voltage and current waveforms recorded when a fault was induced at a distance of 25 ft from the sensing equipment. The peak amplitude of the injected voltage is consistent, while the sensed current amplitude is at its highest among all test locations, reflecting minimal impedance in the fault path. These results confirm the systemʼs ability to reliably detect faults at shorter distances with high accuracy.

An aerial view of the SEPTA Upper Darby rail facility shows numerous parallel train tracks filled with stationary railcars.
Figure C.1. Mapping of the tracks at SEPTA Upper Darby facility.
Long Description.

A single track with no train cars, in the middle of the yard, is outlined with a red rectangular box, highlighting a specific section among the many parallel tracks. The bottom of the picture, below the many parallel tracks, shows maintenance vehicles and structures.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
A ground-level view of two sections of track that were used for testing at the SEPTA facility.
Figure C.2. Track sections at SEPTA facility.
Long Description.

The view is from a point between two parallel railway tracks, looking straight ahead, with gravel ballast underfoot and rails on wooden sleepers. Two sections of track that have been electrically isolated for testing run parallel on either side of the frame. Farther away, on both sides, several silver-colored SEPTA railcars are parked along adjacent tracks.

A close-up view of a railway track section that has been electrically isolated at the SEPTA facility.
Figure C.3. Focused view of the third rail and the track.
Long Description.

Two copper-colored third rails run parallel to the main steel running rail, supported by dark insulator brackets mounted on the ground. Wooden railroad ties and coarse gravel ballast are visible beneath the rails.

Figure C.6 illustrates the response of the system to a fault created 50 ft from the sensing equipment. The sensed current shows a slight decrease compared to the 25-ft test, aligning with the increase in impedance along the fault path. Despite this reduction, the system continues to provide a clear and stable signal, validating its performance over moderate distances.

Figure C.7 represents the systemʼs response to a fault at 150 ft. A noticeable decrease in sensed current amplitude is observed due to the increased distance and impedance. Nevertheless, the waveform remains distinguishable, demonstrating the systemʼs capability to detect and analyze faults even at longer distances, albeit with reduced sensitivity.

Figure C.8 shows the waveforms for a fault at 300 ft from the sensing equipment. The sensed current amplitude is significantly reduced, approaching the systemʼs noise threshold. While detection is still achievable, the reduced signal strength highlights the challenges associated with fault detection at extended distances. This emphasizes the need for potential enhancements in amplification or algorithm optimization for long-range fault detection.

The impedance increases with distance, reflecting the expected resistance and reactance in the third-rail system. These findings demonstrate the systemʼs capability to differentiate fault locations based on impedance characteristics.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
A collage of four photos shows the physical measurements of components of the third-rail system used for testing.
Figure C.4. Physical measurements of the third-rail system.
Long Description.

Photo 1: A tape measure is vertically placed against the end of a section of third rail to measure its height, showing a height measurement of approximately 1.25 inches. Photo 2: A tape measure is held horizontally across the width of the third rail, reading approximately 4 inches. Photo 3: Another vertical height measurement is taken from a different section of the third rail, again showing about 1.25 inches. Photo 4: A ruler is used to measure the width of a rail section placed on the ground, showing approximately 9 centimeters (or 3.5 inches).

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
A set of two line graphs shows the injected voltage and sensed current at a 25-foot short-circuit fault.
Figure C.5. Injected voltage and sensed current at 25-ft short-circuit fault.
Long Description.

The first graph is titled Injected Voltage: 47.13 millivolts (mV) root mean square (RMS). The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows voltage in mV from roughly negative 50 to 50 in increments of 50. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 15 mV), reaches its highest peak at (6.5 seconds, 57 mV), and ends at (8.8 seconds, negative 2 mV). The three peaks are all three at roughly 57 mV. The second graph is titled Sensed Current (Short at 25 feet): 79.88 milliamperes (mA) RMS. The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows current in mA from roughly negative 100 to 100 in increments of 100. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 10 mA), reaches its highest peak at (7.4 seconds, 120 mA), and ends at (8.8 seconds, negative 20 mA). The first two peaks are both at roughly 120 mA, but the last peak is at 100 mA. Note that the coordinate values are approximate.

A set of two line graphs shows the injected voltage and sensed current at a 50-foot short-circuit fault.
Figure C.6. Injected voltage and sensed current at 50-ft short-circuit fault.
Long Description.

The first graph is titled Injected Voltage: 47.13 millivolts (mV) root mean square (RMS). The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows voltage in mV from roughly negative 50 to 50 in increments of 50. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 15 mV), reaches its highest peak at (6.5 seconds, 57 mV), and ends at (8.8 seconds, negative 2 mV). The three peaks are all three at roughly 57 mV. The second graph is titled Sensed Current (Short at 50 feet): 41.72 milliamperes (mA) RMS. The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows current in mA from roughly negative 100 to 100 in increments of 50. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 2 mA), reaches its highest peak at (8.4 seconds, 65 mA), and ends at (8.8 seconds, negative 30 mA). The three peaks are all different, at roughly at 58 mA, 52 mA, and 65 mA, consecutively. Note that the coordinate values are approximate.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
A set of two line graphs shows the injected voltage and sensed current at a 150-foot short-circuit fault.
Figure C.7. Injected voltage and sensed current at 150-ft short-circuit fault.
Long Description.

The first graph is titled Injected Voltage: 47.13 millivolts (mV) root mean square (RMS). The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows voltage in mV from roughly negative 50 to 50 in increments of 50. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 15 mV), reaches its highest peak at (6.5 seconds, 57 mV), and ends at (8.8 seconds, negative 2 mV). The three peaks are all three at roughly 57 mV. The second graph is titled Sensed Current (Short at 150 feet): 16.40 milliamperes (mA) RMS. The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows current in mA from roughly negative 20 to 20 in increments of 20. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 1 mA), reaches its highest peak at (8.3 seconds, 25 mA), and ends at (8.8 seconds, negative 12 mA). The first of the three peaks is at roughly 20 mA, while the second two are at 24 mA and 25 mA, consecutively. Note that the coordinate values are approximate.

A set of two line graphs shows the injected voltage and sensed current at a 300-foot short-circuit fault.
Figure C.8. Injected voltage and sensed current at 300-ft short-circuit fault.
Long Description.

The first graph is titled Injected Voltage: 47.13 millivolts (mV) root mean square (RMS). The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows voltage in mV from roughly negative 50 to 50 in increments of 50. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 15 mV), reaches its highest peak at (6.5 seconds, 57 mV), and ends at (8.8 seconds, negative 2 mV). The three peaks are all three at roughly 57 mV. The second graph is titled Sensed Current (Short at 300 feet): 12.31 milliamperes (mA) RMS. The horizontal axis shows time in seconds from roughly 6.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5. The vertical axis shows current in mA from roughly negative 20 to 20 in increments of 20. The line in the graph is in waveform with three peaks and two lows. The curve begins at (6.3 seconds, negative 7 mA), reaches its highest peak at (8.5 seconds, 28 mA), and ends at (8.8 seconds, 0 mA). The three peaks are very different, with values of 20 mA, 7 mA, and 28 mA, consecutively. Note that the coordinate values are approximate.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.

Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications:

A4A

Airlines for America

AAAE

American Association of Airport Executives

AASHO

American Association of State Highway Officials

AASHTO

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

ACI–NA

Airports Council International–North America

ACRP

Airport Cooperative Research Program

ADA

Americans with Disabilities Act

APTA

American Public Transportation Association

ASCE

American Society of Civil Engineers

ASME

American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ASTM

American Society for Testing and Materials

ATA

American Trucking Associations

CTAA

Community Transportation Association of America

CTBSSP

Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program

DHS

Department of Homeland Security

DOE

Department of Energy

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

FAA

Federal Aviation Administration

FAST

Fixing Americaʼs Surface Transportation Act (2015)

FHWA

Federal Highway Administration

FMCSA

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

FRA

Federal Railroad Administration

FTA

Federal Transit Administration

GHSA

Governors Highway Safety Association

HMCRP

Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program

IEEE

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

ISTEA

Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

ITE

Institute of Transportation Engineers

MAP-21

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012)

NASA

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASAO

National Association of State Aviation Officials

NCFRP

National Cooperative Freight Research Program

NCHRP

National Cooperative Highway Research Program

NHTSA

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

NTSB

National Transportation Safety Board

PHMSA

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

RITA

Research and Innovative Technology Administration

SAE

Society of Automotive Engineers

SAFETEA-LU

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (2005)

TCRP

Transit Cooperative Research Program

TEA-21

Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (1998)

TRB

Transportation Research Board

TSA

Transportation Security Administration

U.S. DOT

United States Department of Transportation

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.

Transportation Research Board
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 19
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 20
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 21
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 22
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 23
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 24
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 25
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Field Testing." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Low-Level DC Leakage and Fault Currents in Transit Systems: Developing a Prototype for Detection and Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29246.
Page 26
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.