Skip to main content

Review of the draft U.S. National Assessment by the Nature Record

In progress

The U.S. National Assessment by the Nature Record is designed to be “a holistic assessment of U.S. lands, waters, and wildlife, and the benefits they provide." A new National Academies ad hoc committee will conduct an independent technical review of the draft U.S. National Assessment by the Nature Record.

Open until March 11, 2026, 7:59 PM EDT
Give feedback on the Provisional Committee Appointments
Formal comments on the provisional appointments are solicited. Your comments will be considered before committee membership is finalized.

Description

An ad hoc committee will conduct a review of the draft United by Nature assessment. The committee's review will address the following questions about the draft report:
1. Does the draft assessment accurately convey important opportunities, challenges, emergent issues, and success stories related to nature in the United States?
2. Considering the draft assessment’s findings, key messages, and graphics:

  • Do the key messages reflect current understanding about status, trends, and future projections of: 1) nature and nature’s benefits in the United States, and 2) the drivers of change in nature in the United States?
  • Are graphics effective in conveying assessment information in a transparent and understandable way?
  • Are the key messages and graphics clear, internally consistent, and appropriate? Specifically, do they reflect supporting evidence, and include an assessment of confidence and likelihood, as appropriate?

3. Regarding the draft assessment’s evidence and completeness:

  • Does the draft assessment accurately reflect the peer-reviewed scientific literature or other source information?
  • Are any critical content areas missing from the draft assessment?
  • Does the draft assessment accurately reflect the relationship between nature and humans based on the peer-reviewed scientific literature or other source information cited?
  • Are chapters consistent in the use of key terms, concepts, and conclusions? Does any topical overlap appropriately support each chapter’s ability to stand alone, without resulting in unnecessary redundancy across the assessment?

4. Are the intended audiences of the draft assessment clear and is the draft assessment written at a technical level that is appropriate for the intended audience?
5. What other significant improvements, if any, might be made in the draft assessment?

Contributors

Committee

Chair

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Download all bios
Give feedback on committee Open until March 11, 2026

Comment on Provisional Committee Appointments

Viewers may communicate with the National Academies at any time over the project's duration. In addition, formal comments on the provisional appointments to a committee of the National Academies are solicited during the 20-calendar day period following the posting of the membership and, as described below, these comments will be considered before committee membership is finalized. We welcome your comments (Use the Feedback link below). Please note that the appointments made to this committee are provisional, and changes may be made. No appointment shall be considered final until we have evaluated relevant information bearing on the committee's composition and balance. This information will include the confidential written disclosures to The National Academies by each member-designate concerning potential sources of bias and conflict of interest pertaining to his or her service on the committee; information from discussion of the committee's composition and balance that is conducted in closed session at its first event and again whenever its membership changes; and any public comments that we have received on the membership during the 20-calendar day formal public comment period. If additional members are appointed to this committee, an additional 20-calendar day formal public comment period will be allowed. It is through this process that we determine whether the committee contains the requisite expertise to address its task and whether the points of views of individual members are adequately balanced such that the committee as a whole can address its charge objectively.

Sponsors

Resources Legacy Fund

Staff

Morgan Monz

Lead

Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.