Completed
Topics
The study will review domestic and international examples and will identify opportunities for repurposing plastics in asphalt, other transportation infrastructure, and in infrastructure outside the transportation domain. It will also examine opportunities to improve plastic recycling processes and the upstream manufacturing and use of plastics to make them compatible with the safe and effective repurposing of plastics waste in infrastructure.
Featured publication
2023
In the U.S., most plastics waste is disposed in landfills, but a significant amount also ends up as litter on land, rivers, and oceans. Today, less than 10 percent of plastics waste is recycled in the U.S. annually. The use of recycled plastics in infrastructure applications has potential to help ex...
View details
Description
In response to requests from Congress, this study will identify domestic and international examples of transportation and non-transportation infrastructure projects that have used recycled plastic materials. Based on an examination of these projects and a review of other relevant research and sources of information, the study committee will review and assess:
• the effectiveness and utility of the uses of plastics waste in infrastructure, including when it is incorporated into the asphalt mixes of pavements and other materials used in transportation and non-transportation infrastructure;
• the extent to which plastics waste materials are consistent with recognized specifications and standards for asphalt and other infrastructure of different types and that are subject to different service levels and performance demands (e.g., strength, maintainability, service life, ride quality);
• the health, safety, and environmental impacts of plastics waste on humans and animals when used in transportation and non-transportation infrastructure;
• the ability of infrastructure containing plastics waste to withstand worsening natural disasters, extreme weather events, and other hazards;
• any other relevant impacts of plastics waste materials when used in asphalt and other transportation and non-transportation infrastructure; and,
• new material applications that could lead to the greater utilization of waste plastics in infrastructure and any potential economic advantage of using plastics waste in infrastructure.
On the basis of this assessment, the committee will identify opportunities for repurposing plastics waste in infrastructure and the characteristics and qualities of the waste streams needed to enable cost-effective and safe applications that provide acceptable service and environmental performance when considered on a life-cycle basis. The study will consider options for better connecting the product design with end-of-use stages of the plastic life cycle, including new polymer options and approaches that reduce the impacts of plastics that enter the environment and that improve recycling of plastics through mechanical and chemical methods. In doing so, consideration will be given to the life cycle impacts from repurposing plastics waste, including on greenhouse gas emissions and to the potential for infrastructure containing plastics in material to perform effectively under changing climate and environmental conditions. The committee may make recommendations, as appropriate, on additional research and demonstrations needed for the repurposing of plastics waste in infrastructure and on policy options for furthering understanding and use of these materials in infrastructure.
Informed by this assessment, the committee will take a longer-term view by considering how plastic recycling processes and upstream plastics manufacturing and product uses can be made more compatible with the recycling and repurposing of plastics waste for infrastructure. The committee may choose to make research and policy recommendations with respect to these issues as appropriate.
Contributors
Committee
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
The conflict of interest policy of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (http://www.nationalacademies.org/coi) prohibits the appointment of an individual to a committee authoring a Consensus Study Report if the individual has a conflict of interest that is relevant to the task to be performed. An exception to this prohibition is permitted if the National Academies determines that the conflict is unavoidable and the conflict is publicly disclosed. A determination of a conflict of interest for an individual is not an assessment of that individual's actual behavior or character or ability to act objectively despite the conflicting interest.
Mr. David Cornell has a conflict of interest related to his service on the Committee for the Study on Repurposing Plastics Waste in Infrastructure because he is consultant for SBA-CCI and for the Association of Plastics Recyclers (APR), a trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. SBA-CCI provides consulting services to the petrochemical, consumer products, and packaging industries on issues affecting the supply of and demand for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin.
The National Academies has concluded that for this committee to accomplish the tasks for which it was established, its membership must include at least one person with current direct experience working on the lifecycle of plastics that spans their manufacturing, recycling, and commercial uses, including end uses for recycled plastics. As described in his biographical summary, Mr. Cornell is a nationally recognized expert in plastics manufacturing, and as Director of Engineering and Recycling for SBA-CCI, Mr. Cornell conducts life cycle assessments and studies of processes and equipment for recycling plastics. Mr. Cornell’s experience at both SBA-CCI and APR includes mechanical and chemical recycling, testing protocols for evaluating the recyclability of plastics, and market demand for recycled plastics.
The National Academies has determined that the experience and knowledge of Mr. Cornell is needed for the committee to accomplish the task for which it has been established. The National Academies could not find another available individual with the equivalent expertise and breadth of experience who does not have a conflict of interest. Therefore, the National Academies has concluded that the conflict is unavoidable.
The National Academies believes that Mr. Cornell can serve effectively as a member of the committee, and the committee can produce an objective report, taking into account the composition of the committee, the work to be performed, and the procedures to be followed in completing the study.
Sponsors
Department of Transportation
EPA
Staff
Monica Starnes
Lead
Thomas Menzies
Lead
Major units and sub-units
Transportation Research Board
Lead
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
Lead
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Lead
Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment
Lead
Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
Lead
Consensus and Advisory Studies Division
Lead