Previous Chapter: 2 Use of the QMU Methodology
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 34
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 35
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 36
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 37
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 38
Next Chapter: 4 Comparison and Contrast of the Use of QMU
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.