Previous Chapter: 2 Use of the QMU Methodology
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 34
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 35
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 36
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 37
Suggested Citation: "3 QMU and the Annual Assessment Review." National Research Council. 2009. Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12531.
Page 38
Next Chapter: 4 Comparison and Contrast of the Use of QMU
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.