Previous Chapter: Letter Report
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." Institute of Medicine. 2012. A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes: Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13440.

REFERENCES

Charles, J. B. 2012. Scientific merit assessment of directed research tasks within the NASA Human Research Program. PowerPoint Presentation at the IOM Workshop on Evaluating the Scientific Merit of Directed Research Proposals, March 28, http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Research/NASA Review/NASA%20Presentation.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

Demicheli, V., and C. Di Pietrantonj. 2007. Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2:MR000003.

Friedl, K. E. 2005. Biomedical research on health and performance of military women: Accomplishments of the Defense Women’s Health Research Program (DWHRP). Journal of Women’s Health 14(9):764-802.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2009. Human Research Program: 2009 annual report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/437981 main_2009_HRP_Annual_Report.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2010. Human Research Program: 2010 annual report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/518001main_HRP_Annual_Report_2010.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011a. Human Research Program: 2011 annual report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/614253main_HRP-Annual-Report-2011.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011b. Human Research Program: Integrated research plan. July 2011, Revision C. http://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/IRP%20Rev%20C.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011c. Human Research Program: Science management plan. May 12, 2011, Revision D. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/611217main_Human%20Research%20 Program%20Science%20Management%20Plan.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011d. Human Research Program: Unique processes, criteria, and guidelines. July 28, 2011, Revision C. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110014960_2011015698.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2012a. Human Research Roadmap: Tasks. http://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/tasks/ (accessed May 10, 2012).

———. 2012b. Human Research Program: Human health and safety. http://www.nasa. gov/exploration/humanresearch/index.html (accessed April 30, 2012).

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2008. National Institutes of Health 2007-2008 peer review self-study: Final draft. http://enhancing-peer-review-nih.gov/meetings/NIHPeerReviewReportFINALDRAFT.pdf (accessed May 1, 2012).

NRC (National Research Council). 1995. On peer review in NASA Life Sciences programs: Letter report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

———. 1998. Peer review in environmental technology development programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." Institute of Medicine. 2012. A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes: Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13440.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 2004. Grant proprosal guide: NSF 04-23 September 2004. Chapter III: NSF proposal processing and review. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/nsf04_23/3.jsp (accessed May 7, 2012).

USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2001. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; request for proposals: Special Research Grants Program, Citrus Tristeza Research. Federal Register 66(13):6208-6215.

Wood, F., and S. Wessely. 2003. Peer review of grant applications: A systematic review. In Peer review in health sciences. 2nd ed., edited by F. Godlee and T. Jefferson. London, UK: BMJ Books. Pp. 14-44.

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." Institute of Medicine. 2012. A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes: Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13440.
Page 25
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." Institute of Medicine. 2012. A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes: Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13440.
Page 26
Next Chapter: Appendix A: Workshop Agenda and List of Participants
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.