Previous Chapter: 4. Accuracy of Toxic Chemical Release Estimates
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 39
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 40
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 41
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 42
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 43
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 44
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 45
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 46
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 47
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 48
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 49
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 50
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 51
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 52
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 53
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 54
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 55
Suggested Citation: "5. Assessing Waste-Reduction Efficiency." National Research Council. 1990. Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering Mass Balance Versus Materials Accounting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1415.
Page 56
Next Chapter: 6. Evaluating Toxic Chemical Management Practices
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.