Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations (2019)

Chapter: Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018

Previous Chapter: Appendix B: Open Session Meeting Agendas
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
SpeciesCommon NameHybrid of?Insect/Fungus/Pest/Other TraitCommon Name/TaxonomyBiotech ApproachTargeted Genes/OtherFinal OutcomeCountry of ReportReference
Poplars
Populus tomentosaChinese white poplarClostera anachoretaMothTransformationCry1AcResistance in field trialChinaRen et al., 2018
Lymantria disparGypsy mothTransformationResistance in field trialChinaRen et al., 2018
Populus sp. hybrid741 clone poplarPopulus alba L. × (P. davidiana Dode + P. simonii Carr.) × P. tomentosa Carr.LepidopteransTransformationCry1Ac, Cry3A, nptIIResistanceChinaZuo et al., 2018
Populus sp.Hybrid poplarP. alba × P. grandidentataMelampsora aecidiodesLeaf rust fungusTransformationAtGolS3 (A. thaliana)Repressed resistance to leaf rust and enhanced ROS toleranceCanadaLa Mantia et al., 2018
Populus sp.Hybrid poplarP. alba × P. grandidentataMelampsora aecidiodesLeaf rust fungusTransformationCsRFS (Cucumber sativus)Repressed resistance to leaf rust and enhanced ROS toleranceCanadaLa Mantia et al., 2018
Populus sp.84K poplarP. alba × P. glandulosaDrought toleranceTransformationPeCHYR1 (from P. euphratica)Increased WUE and drought toleranceChinaHe et al., 2018
Salix mongolicaTransformation—proof of conceptGUSProof-of-concept transformationChinaGuan et al., 2018
Populus sp.Haploid poplarP. simonii × P. nigraEarly floweringTransformation with gene from Salix integraAP1 (Apetala 1)Early flowering transgenicsChinaYang et al., 2018
Populus tomentosaPoplarMelampsora sp.Leaf rust fungusTransformationPtrWRKY18 and PtrWRKY35resistance to Melampsora fungusChinaJiang et al., 2017
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Populus sp. hybridHybrid poplarP. alba × P. tremula 717 cloneMechanism of lignin biosynthesisCRISPR/Cas94CL1, 4CL2Downregulation of genes through CRISPR mutagenesisUSAZhou et al., 2015
Populus tomentosaPoplarGene knockoutCRISPR/Cas9PtoPDSGene knocked outChinaFan et al., 2015
Populus sp.Hybrid poplarP. alba × P. tremula var glandulosaEnhanced wood productionTransformation with gene from Pinus densifloraGibberellin 20-oxidase 1Enhanced wood production with gelatinous wood fibersRepublic of Korea, CanadaPark et al., 2015
Populus sp.PoplarsP. tremula × P. alba var glandulaHeavy metal remediationTransformationScYCF1Heavy cadmium toleranceRepublic of KoreaShim et al., 2013
Populus tomentosaChinese white poplarAlternaria alternataPoplar leaf blightTransformationBbchit1 and LJAMP2Resistance to both diseasesChinaHuang et al., 2012
Colletotrichum sp.Anthracnose diseaseTransformationBbchit1 and LJAMP2ChinaHuang et al., 2012
Populus sp.Hybrid poplarP. nigra × P. maximowicziiMelampsora medusaeLeaf rustTransformationech42 (endocinitase gene from Trichoderma harzianum)Resistance to leaf rustCanadaNoël et al., 2005
Populus sp.Anoplophora glabripennisAsian longhorned beetleBt886 expression in E. coliCry3AaExpression of gene is toxic to the beetle in E. coliChinaChen et al., 2005
Populus sp.Poplars[(Populus tomentosa × P. bolleana) × P. tomentosa]Malacosoma disstria, Lymantria dispar, Stilpnotia candidaMothsTransformationCpTI (cowpea trypsin inhibitor)High resistance to mothsChinaZhang et al., 2004
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
SpeciesCommon NameHybrid of?Insect/Fungus/Pest/Other TraitCommon Name/TaxonomyBiotech ApproachTargeted Genes/OtherFinal OutcomeCountry of ReportReference
Populus sp. hybridINRA 353-38P. tremula × P. tremuloidesChrysomela tremulaeArthropodTransformationCry3AaResistanceFranceGénissel et al., 2003
Populus sp.Hybrid poplarP. tremula × P. tremuloidesChrysomela tremulaeArthropodTransformationCry3AaResistanceFranceGénissel et al., 2003
Populus sp.Hybrid poplar OgyPopulus × P. euamericanaSeptoria musivaLeaf spot diseaseTransformationOxOResistance to SeptoriaUSALiang et al., 2001
Populus sp.Hybrid poplar N-106P. deltoides × P. simoniiLymantria disparGypsy mothTransformationAaIT (scorpion neurotoxin)Resistance to gypsy mothChinaWu et al., 2000
Chestnut
Castanea dentataAmerican chestnutwith Chinese chestnutCryphonectria parasiticaChestnut blight fungusTransformationOxalate oxidase (wheat)Resistance against chestnut blight fungusUSANewhouse et al., 2014
Castanea dentataAmerican chestnutCryphonectria parasiticaChestnut blight fungusTransformation—proof of conceptgfp, bar, OxOProof-of-concept transformationUSAPolin et al., 2006
Castanea sativaEuropean chestnutTransformation—proof of conceptnptII, uidAProof-of-concept transformationSpainCorredoira et al., 2004
Eucalypts
Eucalyptus sp.Realized pollen flow assessmentGM eucalyptNo pollen flow beyond 240 m in a stand that was established in 2009Brazilda Silva et al., 2017
Eucalyptus sp.E. urophylla × E. grandisRalstonia solanacearumBacterial wilt, fungal infection, gray moldTransformationaiiABacterial wilt resistanceChinaOuyang and Li, 2016
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Eucalyptus globulusSalt toleranceTransformationcodASalt tolerance and no adverse effect on soil microbial communities in a 4-year trialJapanOguchi et al., 2014
MangrinIncrease salt toleranceJapan, PakistanYu et al., 2013
Eucalyptus camaldulensisRed river gumSalt tolerancecodA familyIncrease salt toleranceJapanKikuchi et al., 2009
Eucalyptus sp.E. urophylla × E. grandisFrost toleranceTransformationCBF2 (A. thaliana)Increase freeze toleranceUSAHinchee et al., 2009
Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen ashProof-of-concept transformationTransformationnptII, GUSUSADu and Pijut, 2009
Birch
Betula platyphyllaBirchSalt/drought toleranceTransformationBpSPL9Improved ROS scavenging leading to better salt/drought tolerance in transgenic linesChinaNing et al., 2017
Betula platyphyllaBirchSalt toleranceTransformationBplMYB46Overexpression induces improved ROS scavengingChinaGuo et al., 2017
Betula platyphyllaBirchLymantria disparGypsy mothTransformationbgtResistance to gypsy mothChinaZeng et al., 2009
Betula pendulaSilver birchPyrenopeziza betulicolaFuckel leaf spot diseaseTransformationChitinase 4 (sugar beet)Resistance to leaf spot diseaseFinlandPappinen et al., 2002
Spruce
Picea glaucaWhite spruceChoristoneura fumiferanaSpruce budwormTransformationPBgGlu1Resistance to budwormCanadaMageroy et al., 2017
Picea abiesNorway spruceHeterobasidion annosumAnnosum root rotTransformationPaNACO3Resistance to fungusSwedenDalman et al., 2017
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
SpeciesCommon NameHybrid of?Insect/Fungus/Pest/Other TraitCommon Name/TaxonomyBiotech ApproachTargeted Genes/OtherFinal OutcomeCountry of ReportReference
Picea abiesNorway spruceCyratocystis polonicaBark beetle co-invading fungusTransformationFlavan-3-ols, LARResistance to fungusCanadaHammerbacher et al., 2014
Picea glaucaWhite spruceSomatic embryogenesisCHAP3A and WUSCanadaKlimaszewska et al., 2010
Picea marianaBlack spruceCylindrocladium floridanumRoot pathogenTransformationech42 (endocinitase gene from Trichoderma harzianum)Resistance to root diseaseCanadaNoël et al., 2005
Picea glaucaWhite spruceFunctional characterization: CADPost-transformation analysisCADValidation of CAD transformationCanada, FranceBedon et al., 2009
Picea glaucaWhite spruceChoristoneura fumiferanaSpruce budwormTransformationCry1ABResistant to spruce budwormCanadaLachance et al., 2007
Picea glaucaWhite spruceTransformation to test effect on rhizosphere communitiesnptII, CryIA, uidARhizosphere communities significantly affected by transgenesCanadaLeBlanc et al., 2007
Picea glaucaWhite spruceTransformation–proof of conceptnptII, uidACanadaLe et al., 2001
Picea abiesNorway spruceParticle bombardmentbarResistant to Basta herbicideSwedenBrukhin et al., 2000
Picea marianaBlack spruceParticle bombardmentnptII, GUSProof-of-concept transformationCanadaCharest et al., 1996
Douglas Fir
Pseudotsuga menziesiiDouglas firProof of conceptTransformationKanamycin resistanceProof-of-concept transformationUSADandekar et al., 1987
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Pseudotsuga menziesiiDouglas firProof of conceptParticle bombardmentGUSProof of conceptUSAGoldfarb et al., 1991
Larch
Larix sp.LarchL. kaempferi × L. deciduaProof of conceptTransformationKanamycin resistanceProof-of-concept transformationFrance, CanadaLevée et al., 1997
Larix deciduaEuropean larchProof of conceptTransformationProof-of-concept transformationUSAHuang et al., 1991
Pines
Pinus massonianaMasson pineTransformation—proof of conceptCslA2Proof-of-concept transformationChinaMaleki et al., 2018
Pinus elliottiiHybrid pineP. elliottii var. elliottii × P. caribaea var. hondurensisSomatic embryogenesisProof of conceptPortugalNunes et al., 2018
Pinus pineaStone pineTransformation—proof of conceptGUSProof-of-concept transformationSpain, EcuadorBlasco et al., 2016
Pinus radiataRadiata pineTransformation of micropropagated shootsnptII, GUSProof-of-concept transformationNew ZealandGrant et al., 2015
Pinus thunbergiiJapanese black pineSomatic embryogenesisProof of conceptJapanMaruyama and Hosoi, 2016
Pinus radiataRadiata pineSyringil lignin productionTransformationF5H, COMTSyringil lignin production in conifersUSA, New ZealandWagner et al., 2015
Pinus elliottiiSlash pineTransformation—proof of concepthpt, uidAProof-of-concept transformationChinaTang et al., 2014
Pinus radiataRadiata pineLignin composition changesRNAi suppression and transformationCCoA reductaseChanges to cell wall compositionNew Zealand, USA, BelgiumWagner et al., 2013
Pinus radiataRadiata pineLignin reductionTransformationPrCCoAOMTModification of lignin compositionNew ZealandWagner et al., 2011
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
SpeciesCommon NameHybrid of?Insect/Fungus/Pest/Other TraitCommon Name/TaxonomyBiotech ApproachTargeted Genes/OtherFinal OutcomeCountry of ReportReference
Pinus radiataRadiata pineTransformation—proof of conceptnptII, uidA, barProof-of-concept transformationNew ZealandCharity et al., 2005
Pinus radiataRadiata pineGene silencingTransformationCADSilencing of CAD geneNew Zealand, AustraliaWagner et al., 2005
Pinus taedaLoblolly pineDendrolimus punctatus and Cryphothelea formisicolaMoth pests of pinesTransformationCry1AcResistance to moth pestsUSATang and Tian, 2003
Pinus strobusEastern white pineProof of conceptTransformationGUSProof-of-concept transformationCanadaLevée et al., 1999
Elm
Ulmus americanaAmerican elmOphiostoma novoulmiDutch elm diseaseTransformationESF39AResistance to Dutch elm diseaseUSANewhouse et al., 2007
Ulmus proceraEnglish elmOphiostoma novoulmiDutch elm diseaseTransformation—proof of conceptnptII, uidAProof-of-concept transformationUSAGartland et al., 2000
Apple
Malus × domesticaAppleDwarf phenotypeTransformationMdNAC1Overexpression results in dwarf phenotypeChinaJia et al., 2018
Malus × domesticaAppleStress toleranceTransformationMdATG18aTolerance to drought stressChina, USASun et al., 2018
Malus × domesticaAppleStress toleranceTransformationMdcyMDHTolerance to cold and salt stressesChinaWang et al., 2016
Malus × domesticaAppleVenturia inaequalisScabTransformationPuroindoline-B (pinB)Reduction in scab susceptibilityFranceFaize et al., 2004
Malus × domesticaAppleEarly floweringTransformationMdTFLEarly onset of flowering (15 months)JapanKotoda et al., 2002
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Cherry
Prunus aviumCherryProof-of-concept regenerationTransformationgusA, vcFTShoot regeneration/proof of conceptUSA, China, EgyptZong et al., 2018
Prunus sp.Black cherryFlowering control and insect resistanceBark beetlesTransformationPH3, MDL4, PsTFL1Early flowering and pest resistanceUSAWang and Pijut, 2014
Prunus sp.CherryGisela 6 and Glsela 7Proof of conceptNecrotic ring spot virusTransformationRNAiResistance to Prunus necrotic ringspot virusUSASong et al., 2013
Prunus serotinaBlack cherryProof of conceptTransformationAgamousProof-of-concept transformationUSALiu and Pijut, 2010
Prunus cerasus and hybridCherryP. cerasus × P. canescensProof of conceptTransformationnptII, gusAProof-of-concept transformationUSASong and Sink, 2006
Prunus sp.CherryP. avium × P. pseudocerasusProof of conceptSomatic embryogenesisProof of conceptItalyGutièrrez-Pesce and Rugini, 2004
Prunus sp.CherryP. avium × P. pseudocerasusProof of conceptTransformationProof of conceptItaly, USAGutièrrez-Pesce et al., 1998
Peach
Prunus persicaPeachProof of conceptTransformationGUS, GFPProof-of-concept transformationUSA, Poland, Italy, SpainPadilla et al., 2006
Prunus persicaPeachProof-of-concept regenerationTransformation and regenerationnptII, sGFPRegeneration of transformed plantsSpainPérez-Clemente et al., 2005
Papaya
Carica papayaPapayaRing spot virusTransformationCoat protein gene CPResistance to PRSVChina, TaiwanBau et al., 2003
Carica papayaPapayaRing spot virusRNAi particle bombardmentCoat protein gene CPResistance to PRSVChina, TaiwanJia et al., 2017
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
SpeciesCommon NameHybrid of?Insect/Fungus/Pest/Other TraitCommon Name/TaxonomyBiotech ApproachTargeted Genes/OtherFinal OutcomeCountry of ReportReference
Walnut
Juglans regiaPersian walnutTransformationfldIncreased tolerance to osmotic stressIranSheikh Beig Goharrizi et al., 2016
Juglans regiaWalnutTransformationnptII, uidAProof-of-concept transformationUSAWalawage et al., 2014
Juglans sp.WalnutJ. hindsii × J. regiaTransformationrolABCInduce rooting in hybridsUSAVahdati et al., 2002
Juglans regiaWalnutCydia pomonellaCodling mothBt transformationCryIIA(c)Resistance to insectsUSADandekar et al., 1998
Juglans regiaWalnutProof of conceptTransformation and regenerationAPHIITransformation and regeneration of plantsUSAMcGranahan et al., 1988
Plum
Prunus sp.Plum(P. pumila × P. salicina) × P. cerasiferaPlum pox virus (PPV)Plum pox virusRNAiPPV-CVResistance to PPVRussiaSidorova et al., 2018
Prunus sp.PlumPlum pox virus (PPV)TransformationPPV-CVResistance to PPVFrance, USAScorza et al., 1994
Avocado
Persea americanaAvocadoProof of conceptTransformationgfp, DsRed, gfp-gusProof-of-concept transformation and plant recoverySpainPalomo-Rios et al., 2017
Black Locust
Robinia pseudoacaciaBlack locustProof of conceptTransformationKanamycin-resistant geneProof-of-concept transformationUSAHan et al., 1993
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Robinia pseudoacaciaBlack locustHerbicide toleranceTransformation with sonicationbar, gusAHerbicide toleranceSpainZaragoza et al., 2004
Robinia pseudoacaciaBlack locustProof of conceptTransformationGUSProof-of-concept transformationJapanIgasaki et al., 2000
Robinia pseudoacaciaBlack locustProof of conceptTransformationnptII, GUSProof-of-concept transformationIndiaKanwar et al., 2003
Citrus
Citrus sp.Citrus(C. sinensis and C. paradisi) × Poncirus trifoliataProof of conceptTransformationnptII, GUSProof of conceptBrazil, USAde Oliveira et al., 2009
Citrus jambhiriRough lemonProof of conceptTransformation (protoplasts)nptII and catProof of conceptIsraelVardi et al., 1990
Citrus sinensisCitrusDisease resistanceXanthomonas axonopodisTransformationhrpNResistance to citrus cankerBrazil, USABarbosa-Mendes et al., 2009
Sweetgum
Liquidambar styracifluaProof of conceptTransformationKanamycin and GUSProof of conceptUSASullivan and Lagrimini, 1993
Liquidambar formosanaChinese sweetgumStress toleranceTransformationAtNHXITolerance to salt stressChinaQiao et al., 2010
Liquidambar sp.Hybrid SweetgumL. styraciflua × L. formosanaPhytoremediationTransformationECS and merAMercury phytoremediationUSADai et al., 2009
Liquidambar styracifluaInsect resistanceLymantria disparTransformationTobacco anionic peroxidaseGypsy moth resistanceUSADowd et al., 1998
Liquidambar formosanaChinese sweetgumStress toleranceTransformationSOD and PODTolerance to salt, drought, and coldChinaRenying et al., 2007
Cocoa
Theobroma cocoaCocoaProof of conceptTransformationKanamycin and nptIIProof of conceptUSA, GhanaSain et al., 1994
Theobroma cocoaCocoaProof of conceptTransformationuidAProof of conceptBrazilSilva et al., 2009
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
SpeciesCommon NameHybrid of?Insect/Fungus/Pest/Other TraitCommon Name/TaxonomyBiotech ApproachTargeted Genes/OtherFinal OutcomeCountry of ReportReference
Theobroma cocoaCocoaProof of conceptTransformationChi, nptII, and EGFPProof of conceptUSAMaximova et al., 2003
Theobroma cocoaCocoaFungal resistanceColletotrichum gloeosporoidesTransformationTcChi1Resistance to ColletotrichumUSAMaximova et al., 2006
Theobroma cocoaCocoaProof of conceptSomatic embryogenesisProof of conceptColombiaRamírez et al., 2018
Theobroma cocoaCocoaProof of conceptTransformationGFPProof of conceptUSAFister et al., 2016
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.

REFERENCES

Barbosa-Mendes, J.M., F.D.A. Mourao Filho, A. Bergamin Filho, R. Harakava, S.V. Beer, and B.M.J. Mendes. 2009. Genetic transformation of Citrus sinensis cv. Hamlin with hrpN gene from Erwinia amylovora and evaluation of the transgenic lines for resistance to citrus canker. Scientia Horticulturae 122(1):109–115.

Bau, H.J., Y.H. Cheng, T.A. Yu, J.S. Yang, and S.D. Yeh. 2003. Broad-spectrum resistance to different geographic strains of Papaya ringspot virus in coat protein gene transgenic papaya. Phytopathology 93(1):112–120.

Bedon, F., C. Levasseur, J. Grima-Pettenati, A. Séguin, and J. MacKay. 2009. Sequence analysis and functional characterization of the promoter of the Picea glauca cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene in transgenic white spruce plants. Plant Cell Reports 28(5):787–800.

Blasco, M., J. Muñoz-Bertomeu, J. Segura, and I. Arrillaga. 2016. Optimizing DNA delivery into stone pine embryogenic lines. JSM Genetics & Genomics 3(3):1020.

Brukhin, V., D. Clapham, M. Elfstrand, and S. Von Arnold. 2000. Basta tolerance as a selectable and screening marker for transgenic plants of Norway spruce. Plant Cell Reports 19(9):899–903.

Charest, P.J., Y. Devantier, and D. Lachance. 1996. Stable genetic transformation of Picea mariana (black spruce) via particle bombardment. In Vitro—Plant 32(2):91–99.

Charity, J.A., L. Holland, L.J. Grace, and C. Walter. 2005. Consistent and stable expression of the nptII, uidA and bar genes in transgenic Pinus radiata after Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation using nurse cultures. Plant Cell Reports 23(9):606–616.

Chen, J., L.Y. Dai, X.P. Wang, Y.C. Tian, and M.Z. Lu. 2005. The cry3Aa gene of Bacillus thuringiensis Bt886 encodes a toxin against long-horned beetles. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 67(3):351–356.

Corredoira, E., D. Montenegro, M.C. San-José, A.M. Vieitez, and A. Ballester. 2004. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of European chestnut embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Reports 23:311–318.

da Silva, P.H., A.M. Sebbenn, D. Grattapaglia, and J.L.F. Conti, Jr. 2017. Realized pollen flow and wildling establishment from a genetically modified eucalypt field trial in southeastern Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 385:161–166.

Dai, J., R. Balish, R.B. Meagher, and S. Merkle. 2009. Development of transgenic hybrid sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua × L. formosana) expressing γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase or mercuric reductase for phytoremediation of mercury pollution. New Forests 38(1):35–52.

Dalman, K., J.J. Wind, M. Nemesio-Gorriz, A. Hammerbacher, K. Lundén, I. Ezcurra, and M. Elfstrand. 2017. Overexpression of PaNAC03, a stress induced NAC gene family transcription factor in Norway spruce leads to reduced flavonol biosynthesis and aberrant embryo development. BMC Plant Biology 17(1):6.

Dandekar, A.M., P.K. Gupta, D.J. Durzan, and V. Knauf. 1987. Transformation and foreign gene expression in micropropagated douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Nature Biotechnology 5(6):587–590.

Dandekar, A.M., G.H. McGranahan, P.V. Vail, S.L. Uratsu, C.A. Leslie, and J.S. Tebbets. 1998. High levels of expression of full-length cryIA(c) gene from Bacillus thuringiensis in transgenic somatic walnut embryos. Plant Science 131(2):181–193.

de Oliveira, M.L.P., V.J. Febres, M.G.C. Costa, G.A. Moore, and W.C. Otoni. 2009. High-efficiency Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of citrus via sonication and vacuum infiltration. Plant Cell Reports 28(3):387.

Dowd, P.F., L.M. Lagrimini, and D.A. Herms. 1998. Differential leaf resistance to insects of transgenic sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) expressing tobacco anionic peroxidase. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 54(7):712–720.

Du, N., and P.M. Pijut. 2009. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Fraxinus pennsylvanica hypocotyls and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Reports 28(6):915–923.

Faize, M., S. Sourice, F. Dupuis, L. Parisi, M.F. Gautier, and E. Chevreau. 2004. Expression of wheat puroindoline-b reduces scab susceptibility in transgenic apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Plant Science 167(2):347–354.

Fan, D., T. Liu, C. Li, B. Jiao, S. Li, Y. Hou, and K. Luo. 2015. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Scientific Reports 5:12217.

Fister, A.S., Z. Shi, Y. Zhang, E.E. Helliwell, S.N. Maximova, and M.J. Guiltinan. 2016. Protocol: Transient expression system for functional genomics in the tropical tree Theobroma cacao L. Plant Methods 12(1):19.

Gartland, J.S., A.T. McHugh, C.M. Brasier, R.J. Irvine, T.M. Fenning, and K.M. Gartland. 2000. Regeneration of phenotypically normal English elm (Ulmus procera) plantlets following transformation with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector. Tree Physiology 20(13):901–907.

Génissel, A., J.C. Leplé, N. Millet, S. Augustin, L. Jouanin, and G. Pilate. 2003. High tolerance against Chrysomela tremulae of transgenic poplar plants expressing a synthetic cry3Aa gene from Bacillus thuringiensis ssp tenebrionis. Molecular Breeding 11(2):103–110.

Goldfarb, B., S.H. Strauss, G.T. Howe, and J.B. Zaerr. 1991. Transient gene expression of microprojectile-introduced DNA in Douglas-fir cotyledons. Plant Cell Reports 10(10):517–521.

Grant, J.E., P.A. Cooper, and T.M. Dale. 2015. Genetic transformation of micropropagated shoots of Pinus radiata D. Don. bioRxiv 030080.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.

Guan, Q., M. He, H. Ma, X. Liao, Z. Wang, and S. Liu. 2018. Construction of genetic transformation system of Salix mongolica: In vitro leaf-based callus induction, adventitious buds differentiation, and plant regeneration. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 132(1):213–217.

Guo, H., Y. Wang, L. Wang, P. Hu, Y. Wang, Y. Jia, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, and C. Yang. 2017. Expression of the MYB transcription factor gene BplMYB46 affects abiotic stress tolerance and secondary cell wall deposition in Betula platyphylla. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15(1):107–121.

Gutièrrez-Pesce, P.G., and E. Rugini. 2004. Influence of plant growth regulators, carbon sources and iron on the cyclic secondary somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of transgenic cherry rootstock “Colt” (Prunus avium × P. pseudocerasus). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 79(2):223–232.

Gutièrrez-Pesce, P., K. Taylor, R. Muleo, and E. Rugini. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis and shoot regeneration from transgenic roots of the cherry rootstock Colt (Prunus avium× P. pseudocerasus) mediated by pRi 1855 T-DNA of Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Cell Reports 17(6–7):574–580.

Hammerbacher, A., C. Paetz, L.P. Wright, T.C. Fischer, J. Bohlmann, A.J. Davis, T.M. Fenning, J. Gershenzon, and A. Schmidt. 2014. Flavan-3-ols in Norway spruce: Biosynthesis, accumulation, and function in response to attack by the bark beetle-associated fungus Ceratocystis polonica. Plant Physiology 164(4):2107–2122.

Han, K.H., D.E. Keathley, J.M. Davis, and M.P. Gordon. 1993. Regeneration of a transgenic woody legume (Robinia pseudoacacia L., black locust) and morphological alterations induced by Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation. Plant Science 88(2):149–157.

He, F., H.L. Wang, H.G. Li, Y. Su, S. Li, Y. Yang, C.H. Feng, W. Yin, and X. Xia. 2018. Pe CHYR 1, a ubiquitin E3 ligase from Populus euphratica, enhances drought tolerance via ABA-induced stomatal closure by ROS production in Populus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16(8):1514–1528.

Hinchee, M., W. Rottmann, L. Mullinax, C. Zhang, S. Chang, M. Cunningham, L. Pearson, and N. Nehra. 2009. Short-rotation woody crops for bioenergy and biofuels applications. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology 45(6):619–629.

Huang, Y., A.M. Diner, and D.F. Karnosky. 1991. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of a conifer: Larix decidua. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant 27(4):201–207.

Huang, Y., H. Liu, Z. Jia, Q. Fang, and K. Luo. 2012. Combined expression of antimicrobial genes (Bbchit1 and LJAMP2) in transgenic poplar enhances resistance to fungal pathogens. Tree Physiology 32(10):1313–1320.

Igasaki, T., T. Mohri, H. Ichikawa, and K. Shinohara. 2000. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Robinia pseudoacacia. Plant Cell Reports 19(5):448–453.

Jia, D., X. Gong, M. Li, C. Li, T. Sun, and F. Ma. 2018. Overexpression of a novel apple NAC transcription factor gene, MdNAC1, confers the dwarf phenotype in transgenic apple (Malus domestica). Genes 9(5):229–246.

Jia, R., H. Zhao, J. Huang, H. Kong, Y. Zhang, J. Guo, Q. Huang, Y. Guo, Q. Wei, J. Zuo, and Y.J. Zhu. 2017. Use of RNAi technology to develop a PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya. Scientific Reports 7(1):12636.

Jiang, Y., L. Guo, X. Ma, X. Zhao, B. Jiao, C. Li, and K. Luo. 2017. The WRKY transcription factors PtrWRKY18 and PtrWRKY35 promote Melampsora resistance in Populus. Tree Physiology 37(5):665–675.

Kanwar, K., A. Bhardwaj, S. Agarwal, and D.R. Sharma. 2003. Genetic transformation of Robinia pseudoacacia by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 41:149–153.

Kikuchi, A., X. Yu, T. Shimazaki, A. Kawaoka, H. Ebinuma, and K.N. Watanabe. 2009. Allelopathy assessments for the environmental biosafety of the salt-tolerant transgenic Eucalyptus camaldulensis, genotypes codA12-5B, coda 12-5C, and coda 20C. Journal of Wood Science 55(2):149–153.

Klimaszewska, K., G. Pelletier, C. Overton, D. Stewart, and R.G. Rutledge. 2010. Hormonally regulated overexpression of Arabidopsis WUS and conifer LEC1 (CHAP3A) in transgenic white spruce: Implications for somatic embryo development and somatic seedling growth. Plant Cell Reports 29(7):723–734.

Kotoda, N., M. Wada, T. Masuda, and J. Soejima. 2002. The break-through in the reduction of juvenile phase in apple using transgenic approaches. Pp. 337–343 in XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Biotechnology in Horticultural Crop Improvement: Achievements, Opportunities. Acta Horticulturae 625. Korbeek-Lo, Belgium: International Society for Horticultural Science.

La Mantia, J., F. Unda, C.J. Douglas, S.D. Mansfield, and R. Hamelin. 2018. Overexpression of AtGolS3 and CsRFS in poplar enhances ROS tolerance and represses defense response to leaf rust disease. Tree Physiology 38(3):457–470.

Lachance, D., L.P. Hamel, F. Pelletier, J. Valéro, M. Bernier-Cardou, K. Chapman, K. Van Frankenhuyzen, and A. Séguin. 2007. Expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ab gene in transgenic white spruce and its efficacy against the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana). Tree Genetics & Genomes 3(2):153–167.

Le, V.Q., J. Belles-Isles, M. Dusabenyagasani, and F.M. Tremblay. 2001. An improved procedure for production of white spruce (Picea glauca) transgenic plants using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Experimental Botany 52(364):2089–2095.

LeBlanc, P.M., R.C. Hamelin, and M. Filion. 2007. Alteration of soil rhizosphere communities following genetic transformation of white spruce. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73(13):4128–4134.

Levée, V., M.A. Lelu, L. Jouanin, D. Cornu, and G. Pilate. 1997. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of hybrid larch (Larix kaempferi × L. decidua) and transgenic plant regeneration. Plant Cell Reports 16(10):680–685.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.

Levée, V., E. Garin, K. Klimaszewska, and A. Seguin. 1999. Stable genetic transformation of white pine (Pinus strobus L.) after cocultivation of embryogenic tissues with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Molecular Breeding 5(5):429–440.

Liang, H., C.A. Maynard, R.D. Allen, and W.A. Powell. 2001. Increased Septoria musiva resistance in transgenic hybrid poplar leaves expressing a wheat oxalate oxidase gene. Plant Molecular Biology 45(6):619–629.

Liu, X., and P.M. Pijut. 2010. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of mature Prunus serotina (black cherry) and regeneration of transgenic shoots. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 101(1):49–57.

Mageroy, M.H., D. Lachance, S. Jancsik, G. Parent, A. Séguin, J. Mackay, and J. Bohlmann. 2017. In vivo function of Pgglu-1 in the release of acetophenones in white spruce. PeerJ 5:e3535.

Maleki, S.S., K. Mohammadi, and K. S. Ji. 2018. Study on factors influencing transformation efficiency in Pinus massoniana using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 133(3):437–445.

Maruyama, T.E., and Y. Hosoi. 2016. Somatic embryogenesis in Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.). Pp. 27–39 in Somatic Embryogenesis in Ornamentals and Its Applications, A. Mujib, ed. New Delhi, India: Springer.

Maximova, S., C. Miller, G.A. De Mayolo, S. Pishak, A. Young, and M.J. Guiltinan. 2003. Stable transformation of Theobroma cacao L. and influence of matrix attachment regions on GFP expression. Plant Cell Reports 21(9):872–883.

Maximova, S.N., J.P. Marelli, A. Young, S. Pishak, J.A. Verica, and M.J. Guiltinan. 2006. Over-expression of a cacao class I chitinase gene in Theobroma cacao L. enhances resistance against the pathogen, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Planta 224(4):740–749.

McGranahan, G.H., C.A. Leslie, S.L. Uratsu, L.A. Martin, and A.M. Dandekar. 1988. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of walnut somatic embryos and regeneration of transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology 6(7):800–804.

Newhouse, A.E., F. Schrodt, H. Liang, C.A. Maynard, and W.A. Powell. 2007. Transgenic American elm shows reduced Dutch elm disease symptoms and normal mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Cell Reports 26(7):977–987.

Newhouse, A.E., L.D. Polin-McGuigan, K.A. Baier, K.E. Valletta, W.H. Rottmann, T.J. Tschaplinski, C.A. Maynard, and W.A. Powell. 2014. Transgenic American chestnuts show enhanced blight resistance and transmit the trait to T1 progeny. Plant Science 228:88–97.

Ning, K., S. Chen, H. Huang, J. Jiang, H. Yuan, and H. Li. 2017. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the SPL gene family with BpSPL9 transgenic lines found to confer tolerance to abiotic stress in Betula platyphylla Suk. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 130(3):469–481.

Noël, A., C. Levasseur, and A. Séguin. 2005. Enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens in forest trees by genetic transformation of black spruce and hybrid poplar with a Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 67(2):92–99.

Nunes, S., L. Marum, N. Farinha, V.T. Pereira, T. Almeida, D. Sousa, N. Mano, J. Figueiredo, M.C. Dias, and C. Santos. 2018. Somatic embryogenesis of hybrid Pinus elliottii var. elliottii × P. caribaea var. hondurensis and ploidy assessment of somatic plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 132(1):71–84.

Oguchi, T., Y. Kashimura, M. Mimura, X. Yu, E. Matsunaga, K. Nanto, T. Shimada, A. Kikuchi, and K.N. Watanabe. 2014. A multi-year assessment of the environmental impact of transgenic Eucalyptus trees harboring a bacterial choline oxidase gene on biomass, precinct vegetation and the microbial community. Transgenic Research 23(5):767–777.

Ouyang, L.J., and L.M. Li. 2016. Effects of an inducible aiiA gene on disease resistance in Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis. Transgenic Research 25(4):441–452.

Padilla, I.M., A. Golis, A. Gentile, C. Damiano, and R. Scorza. 2006. Evaluation of transformation in peach Prunus persica explants using green fluorescent protein (GFP) and beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter genes. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 84(3):309–314.

Palomo-Ríos, E., S. Cerezo, J.A. Mercado, and F. Pliego-Alfaro. 2017. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) somatic embryos with fluorescent marker genes and optimization of transgenic plant recovery. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 128(2):447–455.

Pappinen, A., Y. Degefu, L. Syrjälä, K. Keinonen, and K. von Weissenberg. 2002. Transgenic silver birch (Betula pendula) expressing sugarbeet chitinase 4 shows enhanced resistance to Pyrenopeziza betulicola. Plant Cell Reports 20(11):1046–1051.

Park, E.J., H.T. Kim, Y.I. Choi, C. Lee, V.P. Nguyen, H.W. Jeon, J.S. Cho, R. Funada, R.P. Pharis, L.V. Kurepin, and J.H. Ko. 2015. Overexpression of gibberellin 20-oxidase1 from Pinus densiflora results in enhanced wood formation with gelatinous fiber development in a transgenic hybrid poplar. Tree Physiology 35(11):1264–1277.

Pérez-Clemente, R.M., A. Pérez-Sanjuán, L. García-Férriz, J.P. Beltrán, and L.A. Cañas. 2005. Transgenic peach plants (Prunus persica L.) produced by genetic transformation of embryo sections using the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as an in vivo marker. Molecular Breeding 14(4):419–427.

Polin, L.D., H. Liang, R.E. Rothrock, M. Nishii, D.L. Diehl, A.E. Newhouse, C.J. Nairn, W.A. Powell, and C.A. Maynard. 2006. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of American chestnut (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.) somatic embryos. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 84(1):69–79.

Qiao, G., J. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y. Sun, L. Pan, H. Song, J. Jiang, R. Zhuo, X. Wang, and Z. Sun. 2010. Transformation of Liquidambar formosana L. via Agrobacterium tumefaciens using a mannose selection system and recovery of salt tolerant lines. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 102(2):163–170.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.

Ramírez, A.M.H., T. de la Hoz Vasquez, T.M.O. Osorio, L.A. Garces, and A.I.U. Trujillo. 2018. Evaluation of the potential of regeneration of different Colombian and commercial genotypes of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) via somatic embryogenesis. Scientia Horticulturae 229:148–156.

Ren, Y., J. Zhang, G. Wang, X. Liu, L. Li, J. Wang, and M. Yang. 2018. The relationship between insect resistance and tree age of transgenic triploid Populus tomentosa plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:53.

Renying, Z., Q. Guirong, and S. Zongxiu. 2007. Transgene expression in Chinese sweetgum driven by the salt induced expressed promoter. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 88(1):101–107.

Sain, S.L., K.K. Oduro, and D.B. Furtek. 1994. Genetic transformation of cocoa leaf cells using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 37(3):243–251.

Scorza, R., M. Ravelonandro, A.M. Callahan, J.M. Cordts, M. Fuchs, J. Dunez, and D. Gonsalves. 1994. Transgenic plums (Prunus domestica L.) express the plum pox virus coat protein gene. Plant Cell Reports 14(1):18–22.

Sheikh Beig Goharrizi, M.A., A. Dejahang, M. Tohidfar, A. Izadi Darbandi, N. Carillo, M.R. Hajirezaei, and K. Vahdati. 2016. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of somatic embryos of Persian walnut using fld gene for osmotic stress tolerance. Journal on Agricultural Science and Technology 18(2):423–435.

Shim, D., S. Kim, Y.I. Choi, W.Y. Song, J. Park, E.S. Youk, S.C. Jeong, E. Martinoia, E.W. Noh, and Y. Lee. 2013. Transgenic poplar trees expressing yeast cadmium factor 1 exhibit the characteristics necessary for the phytoremediation of mine tailing soil. Chemosphere 90(4):1478–1486.

Sidorova, T., A. Pushin, D. Miroshnichenko, and S. Dolgov. 2018. Generation of transgenic rootstock plum (Prunus pumila L. × P. salicina Lindl.) × (P. cerasifera Ehrh.) using hairpin-RNA construct for resistance to the plum pox virus. Agronomy 8(1):2.

Silva, T.E., L.C. Cidade, F.C. Alvim, J.C. Cascardo, and M.G. Costa. 2009. Studies on genetic transformation of Theobroma cacao L.: Evaluation of different polyamines and antibiotics on somatic embryogenesis and the efficiency of uidA gene transfer by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 99(3):287–298.

Song, G.Q., and K.C. Sink. 2006. Transformation of Montmorency sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) and Gisela 6 (P. cerasus × P. canescens) cherry rootstock mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Reports 25(2):117–123.

Song, G.Q., K.C. Sink, A.E. Walworth, M.A. Cook, R.F. Allison, and G.A. Lang. 2013. Engineering cherry rootstocks with resistance to Prunus necrotic ring spot virus through RNAi-mediated silencing. Plant Biotechnology Journal 11(6):702–708.

Sullivan, J., and L.M. Lagrimini. 1993. Transformation of Liquidambar styraciflua using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Reports 12(6):303–306.

Sun, X., P. Wang, X. Jia, L. Huo, R. Che, and F. Ma. 2018. Improvement of drought tolerance by overexpressing MdATG18a is mediated by modified antioxidant system and activated autophagy in transgenic apple. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16(2):545–557.

Tang, W., and Y. Tian. 2003. Transgenic loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plants expressing a modified δ-endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis with enhanced resistance to Dendrolimus punctatus Walker and Crypyothelea formosicola Staud. Journal of Experimental Botany 54(383):835–844.

Tang, W., B. Xiao, and Y. Fei. 2014. Slash pine genetic transformation through embryo cocultivation with A. tumefaciens and transgenic plant regeneration. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 50(2):199–209.

Vahdati, K., J.R. MeKenna, A.M. Dandekar, C.A. Leslie, S.L. Uratsu, W.P. Hackett, P. Negri, and G.H. McGranahan. 2002. Rooting and other characteristics of a transgenic walnut hybrid (Juglans hindsii × J. regia) rootstock expressing rolABC. Journal of the American Horticultural Society 127(5):724–728.

Vardi, A., S. Bleichman, and D. Aviv. 1990. Genetic transformation of Citrus protoplasts and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Science 69(2):199–206.

Wagner, A., L. Phillips, R.D. Narayan, J.M. Moody, and B. Geddes. 2005. Gene silencing studies in the gymnosperm species Pinus radiata. Plant Cell Reports 24(2):95–102.

Wagner, A., Y. Tobimatsu, L. Phillips, H. Flint, K. Torr, L. Donaldson, L. Pears, and J. Ralph. 2011. CCoAOMT suppression modifies lignin composition in Pinus radiata. Plant Journal 67(1):119–129.

Wagner, A., Y. Tobimatsu, G. Goeminne, L. Phillips, H. Flint, D. Steward, K. Torr, L. Donaldson, W. Boerjan, and J. Ralph. 2013. Suppression of CCR impacts metabolite profile and cell wall composition in Pinus radiata tracheary elements. Plant Molecular Biology 81(1–2):105–117.

Wagner, A., Y. Tobimatsu, L. Phillips, H. Flint, B., Geddes, F. Lu, and J. Ralph. 2015. Syringyl lignin production in conifers: Proof of concept in a Pine tracheary element system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 12(19):6218–6223.

Walawage, S.L., C.A. Leslie, M.A. Escobar, and A.M. Dandekar. 2014. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of walnut (Juglans regia). Plant Physiology 4(19):e1258.

Wang, Q.J., H. Sun, Q.L. Dong, T.Y. Sun, Z.X. Jin, Y.J. Hao, and Y.X. Yao. 2016. The enhancement of tolerance to salt and cold stresses by modifying the redox state and salicylic acid content via the cytosolic malate dehydrogenase gene in transgenic apple plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14(10):1986–1997.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.

Wang, Y., and P.M. Pijut. 2014. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of black cherry for flowering control and insect resistance. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 119(1):107–116.

Wu, N.F., Q. Sun, B. Yao, Y.L. Fan, H.Y. Rao, M.R. Huang, and M.X. Wang. 2000. Insect-resistant transgenic poplar expressing AaIT gene. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology 16(2):129–133.

Yang, J., K. Li, C. Li, J. Li, B. Zhao, W. Zheng, Y. Gao, and C. Li. 2018. In vitro anther culture and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the AP1 gene from Salix integra Linn. in haploid poplar (Populus simonii × P. nigra). Journal of Forestry Research 29(2):321–330.

Yu, X., A. Kikuchi, T. Shimazaki, A. Yamada, Y. Ozeki, E. Matsunaga, H. Ebinuma, and K.N. Watanabe. 2013. Assessment of the salt tolerance and environmental biosafety of Eucalyptus camaldulensis harboring a mangrin transgene. Journal of Plant Research 126(1):141–150.

Zaragoza, C., J. Munoz-Bertomeu, and I. Arrillaga. 2004. Regeneration of herbicide-tolerant black locust transgenic plants by SAAT. Plant Cell Reports 22(11):832–838.

Zeng, F., Y. Zhan, N. Nan, Y. Xin, F. Qi, and C. Yang. 2009. Expression of bgt gene in transgenic birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.). African Journal of Biotechnology 8(15):3392–3398.

Zhang, Q., S. Lin, Y. Lin, Z. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Zou, and Z. Wang. 2004. Identification of CpTI gene integration for 2-year-old transgenic poplars at DNA level. Forestry Studies in China 6(3):15–19.

Zhou, X., T.B. Jacobs, L.J. Xue, S.A. Harding, and C.J. Tsai. 2015. Exploiting SNP s for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate: CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. New Phytologist 208(2):298–301.

Zong, X., Q. Chen, M.A. Nagaty, Y. Kang, G. Lang, and G.Q. Song. 2018. Adventitious shoot regeneration and Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of leaf explants of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1–8.

Zuo, L., R. Yang, Z. Zhen, J. Liu, L. Huang, and M. Yang. 2018. A 5-year field study showed no apparent effect of the Bt transgenic 741 poplar on the arthropod community and soil bacterial diversity. Scientific Reports 8(1):1956.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 201
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 202
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 203
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 204
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 205
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 206
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 207
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 208
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 209
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 210
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 211
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 212
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 213
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 214
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 215
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 216
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 217
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Biotech Tree Research and Development, 19872018." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25221.
Page 218
Next Chapter: Appendix D: Chronological Summary of Studies Empirically Examining Public and Other Stakeholder Responses to the Use of Biotechnology in Trees and Forests
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.