Dropdown items
My Academies

Personal Library

Account settings

Independent Assessment of Science and Technology for the Department of Energy's Defense Environmental Cleanup Program (2019)

Chapter: References

Visit NAP.edu/10766 to get more information about this book, to buy it in print, or to download it as a free PDF.

Previous chapter Next chapter
Page of 106
Search this publication

Previous Chapter: 3 Review and Assessment of Technologies and Alternative Approaches

Page 75 Cite Bookmark

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Independent Assessment of Science and Technology for the Department of Energy's Defense Environmental Cleanup Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25338.

References

CRESP (Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation) Omnibus Risk Review Committee. 2015. A Review of the Use of Risk-Informed Management in the Cleanup Program for Former Defense Nuclear Sites. https://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/hanford/article33023001.ece/BINARY/Omnibus%20Risk%20Review%20Report_FINAL.

DOE (Department of Energy). 2007. Engineering and Technology Roadmap: Reducing the Uncertainty in the EM Program. Washington, DC.

DOE. 2008. Root Cause Analyses: Contract and Project Management. Corrective Action Plan. https://science.energy.gov/~/media/opa/pdf/processes-and-procedures/doe/Final_CAP_Report_Website.pdf.

DOE. 2017. Department of Energy FY 2018 Congressional Budget Request, DOE/CF 0132, Vol. 5. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/06/f34/FY2018BudgetVolume5.pdf.

DOE. 2018. Department of Energy FY 2019 Congressional Budget Request; Budget in Brief. DOE/CF-0144. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/03/f49/DOE-FY2019-Budget-inBrief_0.pdf.

DOE-EHSS (Department of Energy’s Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security). 2018. Proposed rules: 10 CFR Part 830, RIN 1992–AA57, nuclear safety management. Federal Register 83(153):38982. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-08-08/pdf/2018-16863.pdf.

DOE-EM (Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management). 2010. Report on Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/em/FINALREPORTonAcquisitionandProjectManagementContinuousImprovement-2Nov10.pdf.

DOE-EM. 2013. Groundwater Strategy for the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. DOE/OR/01-2628/V2&D1. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1806/ML18064A894.pdf.

DOE-EM. 2016a. Innovation and Technology: Charting the Path for Fiscal Years 2017-2021.

DOE-EM. 2016b. Mission and Functions. August 30. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/08/f33/OFFICIALMISSIONFUNCTION_FINAL_UpdatesAugust2016.pdf.

Page 76 Cite Bookmark

DOE-EM. 2016c. Technology Plan to Address the EM Mercury Challenge. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/05/f32/2016%2C%20EM%20Technology%20Plan%20to%20Address%20Mercury.pdf.

DOE-EM. 2017a. Offsite Groundwater Assessment, Remedial Site Evaluation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. DOE/OR/01-2715&D2_R. https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/A.0100.037.2570.pdf.

DOE-EM. 2017b. SRS Celebrates 20 Years Since First Tank Closure. https://www.energy.gov/em/articles/srs-celebrates-20-years-first-tank-closure.

DOE-EM. 2018a. Assistant Secretary White Lays Out Plans for Contracting, Regulatory Reform at Radwaste. https://www.energy.gov/em/articles/assistant-secretary-white-laysout-plans-contracting-regulatory-reform-radwaste.

DOE-EM. 2018b. Hanford Test Bed Program Initiative. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/07/f53/Hanford%20Test%20Bed%20Initiative%20Fact%20Sheet%207-12-18.pdf.

DOE-EM. 2018c. Request for public comment on the U.S. Department of Energy interpretation of high-level radioactive waste. Federal Register 83(196):50909-50911.

DOE-EM. 2018d. Technetium Management Technology Roadmap.

DOE-EMAB (Department of Energy’s Environmental Management Advisory Board, Science & Technology Subcommittee). 2014. Report to the Environmental Management Advisory Board: DOE-EM Technology Development and Deployment Program. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/07/f17/S%20%20T%20Report%20and%20Recommendations%20052214.pdf.

DOE-OREM (Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management). 2017. Program Plan FY 2014 to 2024: Continuing Progress. Restoring the Environment. Enabling Missions. Oak Ridge, Tennessee. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/11/f46/OREM%2010-Year%20Plan.pdf.

DOE-ORO (Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge Operations Office). 2014. Mercury Technology Development Plan for Remediation of the Y-12 Plant and East Fork Poplar Creek. DOE/ORO-2489.

DOE-RL (Department of Energy’s Richland Operations Office). 2014. Remedial Design Report/Remedial Action Work Plan for 300-FF-2 Soils. https://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/pdf.cfm?accession=0081152H.

DOE-RL. 2016. Prototype Hanford Barrier: 1994 to 2015. DOE/RL-2016-37, Revision 0. Richland, WA: Richland Operations Office. https://www.hanford.gov/c.cfm/sgrp/DOERL-2016-37/DOE-RL-2016-37_R0.pdf.

DOE-RL. 2019. 2019 Hanford Lifecycle Scope, Schedule and Cost Report. DOE/RL-2018-45, Revision 0. Richland, WA: Richland Operations Office. https://www.hanford.gov/files.cfm/2019_Hanford_Lifecycle_Report_w-Transmittal_Letter.pdf.

EFCOG (Energy Facility Contractors Organization). 2018. Low-Level Waste/Mixed Low-Level Waste Initiative, EFCOG Waste Management Working Group. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55c4c892e4b0d1ec35bc5efb/t/5b97bfb26d2a73cf213aca4a/1536671671422/September+2018+Bulletin+2018.pdf.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. EPA Superfund Record of Decision Hanford 200-Area (USDOE) and Hanford 100-Area (USDOE). EPA/ROD/R10-99/039. https://www.emcbc.doe.gov/SEB/CPCC/Documents/library/Regulatory/EPA%20Superfund%20-%20Interim%20Action%20ROD,%20U.S.%20DOE%20Hanford%20100%20Area%20and%20200%20Area%20100-BC-1,%20100-BC-2,%20100-DR-1,%20100-DR-2,%20100-FR-1,%20100-FR-2,%20100-HR-1,%20100-HR-2,%20100-KR-1....%20-%20(EPA-ROD-R10-99-039).pdf.

GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2006. Nuclear Cleanup of Rocky Flats. DOE Can Use Lessons Learned to Improve Oversight of Other Sites’ Cleanup Activities. GAO-06-352. https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06352.pdf.

Page 77 Cite Bookmark

GAO. 2017a. High-Risk Series: Progress on Many High-Risk Areas, While Substantial Efforts Needed on Others. GAO-17-375. Testimony Before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO17-375t.

GAO. 2017b. Nuclear Waste: Benefits and Costs Should Be Better Understood Before DOE Commits to a Separate Repository for Defense Waste. Report to Congressional Addressees. GAO-17-174. https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/684918.pdf.

GAO. 2019. Department of Energy: Program-Wide Strategy and Better Reporting Needed to Address Growing Environmental Cleanup Liability. GAO-19-28. Report to the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/696632.pdf.

Gee, G. W., R. R. Kirkham, J. L. Downs, and M. D. Campbell. 1989. The Field Lysimeter Test Facility (FLTF) at the Hanford Site: Installation and Initial Tests. PNL-6810. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratory. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6518216.

Gephart, R. E. 2003. Hanford: A Conversation About Nuclear Waste and Cleanup. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.

Hirlimann, C. 2016. Laser Induced Nuclear Waste Transmutation. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Charles_Hirlimann/publication/301837643_Laser_induced_nuclear_waste_transmutation/links/5820a50a08aeccc08af65744/Laser-induced-nuclear-waste-transmutation.pdf.

Lutze, W., and R. C. Ewing, eds. 1988. Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future. Amsterdam: North-Holland. http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:20061516.

MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Technology Review. 2011. How to transmute elements with laser light. Physics arXiv Blog. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/423107/how-to-transmute-elements-with-laser-light.

NAS, NAE, and IOM (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine). 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11463.

NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE’s Environmental Management Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/5173.

NRC. 1996. Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program: Initial Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9219.

NRC. 1999. Ground Water & Soil Cleanup: Improving Management of Persistent Contaminants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9615.

NRC. 2000. Research Needs in Subsurface Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9793.

NRC. 2001. Research Opportunities for Deactivating and Decommissioning Department of Energy Facilities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10184.

NRC. 2002. Research Opportunities for Managing the Department of Energy’s Transuranic and Mixed Waste. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10513.

NRC. 2006. Primarily Tank Waste Retrieval, Processing, and On-site Disposal at Three Department of Energy Sites: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11618.

NRC. 2010. Science and Technology for DOE Site Cleanup: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11932.

Page 78 Cite Bookmark

ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). 2015. Mercury Remediation Technology Development for Lower East Fork Poplar Creek. ORNL/SPR-2014/645. https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/Files/Pub53267.pdf.

Pro2Serve (Professional Project Services, Inc.). 2014. Strategic Plan for Mercury Remediation at the Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. DOE/OR/01-2605&D2. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management. https://doeic.science.energy.gov/uploads/F.0608.006.0972.pdf.

Reid, D. S., T. A. Wooley, and S. E. Kelly. 2017. River Protection Project Technology and Innovation Roadmap. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1420311.

SEAB (Secretary of Energy Advisory Board). 2014. Report of the Task Force on Technology Development for Environmental Management. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/01/f19/Report%20of%20the%20SEAB%20Task%20Force%20on%20Tech%20Dev%20for%20EM_FINAL.pdf.

SRR (Savannah River Remediation, LLC). 2016. Radioactive Liquid Waste: Operational Closure of Tanks. Fact Sheet. https://www.srs.gov/general/news/factsheets/srr_tank_closure.pdf.

SRR. 2018. Liquid Waste Project Technology Development & Support Optimization Blueprint Fiscal Year 2018. SRR-CWDA-2017-00066. Washington, DC: Department of Energy.

Van Tuyle, G. J., D. R. Bennett, J. W. Herczeg, E. D. Arthur, D. J. Hill, and P. J. Finck. 2002. U.S. accelerator-driven transmutation of waste (ATW) program objectives, and technology development efforts. Progress in Nuclear Energy 40(3-4):357-364.