THE LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEM SERIES
Strategies for Achieving a Healthier America
Melissa H. Laitner, Audrey M. Huang,
and Shannon Takala-Harrison, Editors

WASHINGTON, DC
NAM.EDU

NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
This publication was initiated and funded by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). It has undergone peer review according to procedures established by the NAM. Publication by the NAM signifies that it is the product of a carefully considered process and is a contribution worthy of public attention but does not constitute an endorsement of conclusions and recommendations by the NAM. The views presented in this publication are those of individual contributors and do not represent formal consensus positions of the authors’ organizations; the NAM; or the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-71666-6
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-71666-7
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/27588
Copyright 2024 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and National Academies Press and the graphical logos for each are all trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
Suggested citation: National Academy of Medicine. 2024. The State of the U.S. Biomedical and Health Research Enterprise: Strategies for Achieving a Healthier America. M. H. Laitner, A. M. Huang, and S. Takala-Harrison, editors. NAM Special Publication. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27588.
“Knowing is not enough; we must apply.
Willing is not enough; we must do”
—GOETHE
LEADERSHIP
INNOVATION
IMPACT
![]()
for a healthier future

The National Academy of Medicine is one of three Academies constituting the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies). The National Academies provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on issues of health, health care, and biomedical science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
Learn more about the National Academy of Medicine at NAM.edu.
E. ALBERT REECE (Chair), University of Maryland School of Medicine
JEFFREY R. BALSER (Sub-Group Chair), Vanderbilt University Medical Center
DIANE E. GRIFFIN (Sub-Group Chair), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
KIRSTEN BIBBINS-DOMINGO, University of California, San Francisco; Journal of the American Medical Association
VICTOR J. DZAU, National Academy of Medicine
KAFUI DZIRASA, Duke University Medical Center
CLAIRE M. FRASER, University of Maryland School of Medicine
LINDA P. FRIED, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
ANN KURTH, The New York Academy of Medicine
SUDIP PARIKH, American Association for the Advancement of Science
RANDALL RUTTA, National Health Council
MARY WOOLLEY, Research!America
KEITH YAMAMOTO, University of California, San Francisco
ELIAS ZERHOUNI, Johns Hopkins University; Opko Health
HUDA Y. ZOGHBI, Baylor College of Medicine
AUDREY M. HUANG, University of Maryland School of Medicine
MELISSA H. LAITNER, National Academy of Medicine
SHANNON TAKALA-HARRISON, University of Maryland School of Medicine
This page intentionally left blank.
The author group would like to express its sincere gratitude to the following experts, who were called upon to share their views on the past, present, and future state of the U.S. biomedical research enterprise for this publication. Their insights and knowledge have informed the final form of this publication.
NORMAN R. AUGUSTINE, Lockheed Martin Corporation (retired) and former Undersecretary of the Army
ROY BLUNT, U.S. Senator (R), Missouri
DANIELLE CARNIVAL, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
FRANCIS S. COLLINS, National Institutes of Health
ROBERT W. CONN, University of California, San Diego
HARVEY V. FINEBERG, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
JAMES FLYNN, Deerfield Management Company
MARIA FREIRE, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
DAVID WHOLLEY, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (retired)
This page intentionally left blank.
This publication has undergone peer review according to procedures established by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). As an NAM Special Publication, it is the product of a carefully considered and systematic process and has the approval of the NAM Council. It is not a consensus study of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and does not necessarily represent positions of the individual authors’ organizations.
The author group thanks the following individuals for their review of this report:
NORMAN R. AUGUSTINE, Lockheed Martin Corporation (retired) and former Undersecretary of the Army
HARVEY V. FINEBERG, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
ANNA GREKA, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
RALPH SNYDERMAN, Duke University School of Medicine
SOHAIL TAVAZOIE, The Rockefeller University
The reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, but they were not asked to endorse the content of the Special Publication and did not see the final draft before it was published.
Review of this publication was overseen by GILBERT S. OMENN, University of Michigan Medical School. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the author group and the National Academy of Medicine.
This page intentionally left blank.
2 A Strategic and Coordinated Approach to the U.S. Biomedical Research Enterprise
3 Streamlined, Coordinated, and Increasingly Impactful Funding
4 A Renewed Focus on Health Equity
5 The Need for Federal Coordination and Use of Convergence Science
6 A 21st-Century Workforce for the U.S. Biomedical Research Enterprise of the Future
7 A Renewed and Revitalized U.S. Biomedical Research Enterprise Is Possible
This page intentionally left blank.
1-1 Definitions of Types of Research Included in the U.S. Biomedical Research Enterprise
2-1 National Agenda Setting Example 1: Singapore
2-2 National Agenda Setting Example 2: China
2-3 National Agenda Setting Example 3: European Union
1-1 Top 10 leading causes of death in the United States, by sex, 2019 and 2020
1-2 National Institutes of Health funding by institute, 1999–2021
1-3 Cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1999–2021
1-4 National Institutes of Health funding by year
1-5 Future state of the U.S. biomedical research enterprise
2-1 National Institutes of Health spending on basic and applied research, 2003–2022
2-2 Life expectancy at birth and age 65, by sex: United States, 2021 and 2022
2-3 Maternal mortality rate by race and Hispanic origin: United States, 2021 and 2022
2-4 Age-adjusted suicide rates by sex: United States, 2001–2021
2-5 U.S. deaths due to dementias
2-8 Basic science research expenditures (% gross domestic product) by country, 2000–2021
3-2 Basic science research expenditures (% gross domestic product) by country, 2000–2021
3-3 Current state of the U.S. biomedical research enterprise
4-1 Prostate cancer: Age-adjusted rate of new cases per 10,000 men by race/ethnicity
4-2 Female breast cancer: Age-adjusted death rate per 100,000 women by race/ethnicity
4-3 Estimated HIV infections in the United States by region, 2021
6-1 Number of U.S. trainees by career stage, 1979–2019
6-2 U.S. postdoctorate recipients, by broad field, 2001 and 2021
7-1 Current state of the U.S. biomedical research enterprise
7-2 Future state of the U.S. biomedical research enterprise
2-1 Health Conditions Impacting Women and Men in the United States, 2022
| AIDS | acquired immunodeficiency syndrome |
| AMP | Accelerating Medicines Partnership |
| COVID-19 | coronavirus disease 2019 |
| FDA | U.S. Food and Drug Administration |
| FNIH | Foundation for the National Institutes of Health |
| GDP | gross domestic product |
| GHIT | Global Health Innovative Technology Fund |
| HGP | Human Genome Project |
| HIV | human immunodeficiency virus |
| LN | lupus nephritis |
| MLP | Medium- and Long-Term Plan for the Development of Science and Technology |
| MSI | minority-serving institution |
| NCI | National Cancer Institute |
| NHLBI | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute |
| NIAID | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases |
| NIDDK | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases |
| NIH | National Institutes of Health |
| NSF | National Science Foundation |
| OMB | Office of Management and Budget |
| OSRD | Office of Scientific Research and Development |
| OWS | Operation Warp Speed |
| PPP | public–private partnership |
| R&D | research and development |
| WHO | World Health Organization |