
Consensus Study Report
NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
This study was supported by a contract and grants between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institutes of Health (Contract No. HHSN263201800029I/75N 98024F00006), the National Science Foundation (Grant No. 2426575), and the National Security Agency (Grant No. H98230-24-1-0019). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-60133-7
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/29292
This publication is available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242; https://nap.nationalacademies.org.
The manufacturer’s authorized representative in the European Union for product safety is Authorised Rep Compliance Ltd., Ground Floor, 71 Lower Baggot Street, Dublin D02 P593 Ireland; www.arccompliance.com.
Copyright 2026 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and National Academies Press and the graphical logos for each are all trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2026. Frontiers of Statistics in Science and Engineering: 2035 and Beyond. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/29292.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. Tsu-Jae Liu is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Rapid Expert Consultations published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are authored by subject-matter experts on narrowly focused topics that can be supported by a body of evidence. The discussions contained in rapid expert consultations are considered those of the authors and do not contain policy recommendations. Rapid expert consultations are reviewed by the institution before release.
For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/purpose.
KATHERINE B. ENSOR, Rice University, Chair
LANCE A. WALLER, Emory University, Vice Chair
RINA F. BARBER (NAS), The University of Chicago
AMY BRAVERMAN, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
LORIN CRAWFORD, Microsoft Research
DAVID B. DUNSON, Duke University
OMAR GHATTAS, The University of Texas at Austin
FRAUKE KREUTER, University of Maryland
XIHONG LIN (NAS/NAM), Harvard University
BRIAN REICH, North Carolina State University
STEPHAN R. SAIN, Jupiter Intelligence
AARTI SINGH, Carnegie Mellon University
DANIELA M. WITTEN, University of Washington
TIAN ZHENG, Columbia University
BRITTANY SEGUNDO, Program Officer, Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics (BMSA), Study Director
MICHELLE K. SCHWALBE, Senior Program Director, Physical Sciences, Systems, and Infrastructure Program Area
ERIK SVEDBERG, Deputy Director, BMSA and National Materials and Manufacturing Board
SAMANTHA KORETSKY, Research Associate, BMSA
HEATHER LOZOWSKI, Senior Finance Business Partner
MICA PACHECO, Associate Program Officer, BMSA
JOE PALMER, Senior Project Assistant, BMSA
This page intentionally left blank.
This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.
We thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations of this report nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by ALICIA CARRIQUIRY (NAM), Iowa State University, and ELIZABETH STUART (NAM), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. They were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies.
The field of statistics is the language of science and innovation. Throughout history, the ability to examine data and information (or lack thereof) critically and provide actionable insight and wisdom grounded in an understanding of the potential biases and uncertainties around these measurements has elevated science and engineering in service to humanity. The field is broad and advances in response to novel ideas and breakthroughs both from within the field itself and its intersections with other disciplines. Statistical advances represent both new statistical thinking and new insights, data, and analytic paradigms from other fields including mathematics and computer science, as well as through collaborations with specific disciplines within science, engineering, medicine, and beyond. This “melting pot” of innovation results in statistics evolving as a dynamic field of inquiry. Statistics also has its own deep roots that grow with new data, assumptions, and computational capabilities, all of which motivate new questions that were unthinkable or considered impossible only a few years earlier. As such, the frontiers of statistics derive from within the field itself and from input into statistics from other fields, and the frontiers provide input from statistics back to these fields.
Because of the close relationship between statistics and other fields in science and engineering, many technological advances today stem from foundational advancements in statistics over the past few decades. Statistics provides the scientific basis for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, which are revolutionizing the world and will bring societal transformations in ways that are difficult to predict. Statistics affords a pathway for transparent, responsible, and trustworthy AI, which is a necessary and important requirement, as these technologies are interwoven with the fabric of society.
Frontiers of Statistics in Science and Engineering: 2035 and Beyond represents a year-long exercise to understand the breadth and depth of the field of statistics and implications for its trajectory over the next 10 years. This intense effort not only reaffirmed the critical importance of the field but also demonstrated its expanded relevance amid the technological advances we all navigate. The life cycle of statistical innovation will remain central to science and engineering progress as statisticians work collaboratively, as new questions, new data types, and new methodologies arise.
We would like to thank our sponsors (in alphabetical order): the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the National Security Agency for their support for this study and for outlining such important objectives. The statement of task focuses on science and engineering, which, for the purposes of this study, includes health and medicine. Our report has retained that focus. The field of statistics also has a long history of contributions to and reciprocal development from the social sciences, but this is beyond the scope of the report.
This impactful study was made possible through the dedication and significant contributions of an exceptional committee, including the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine staff. All committee members brought expertise across the breadth of the field. We also recognize the invaluable suggestions and insights from the independent review panel that read a previous draft of the report. The collective and tireless commitment to science, technology, and society was evident throughout the process. We are grateful for the extensive contributions of leaders in our field through various panel discussions, as well as those who provided direct input via our online form.
We want to thank our community and the National Academies for entrusting us with this important role. We hope that by 2035 the study will have paved the way for lasting, transformative impact by bringing the full statistical endeavor to bear.
Katherine B. Ensor, Chair
Lance A. Waller, Vice Chair
Committee on the Frontiers of Statistics in Science and Engineering: 2035 and Beyond
February 2026
We are grateful to the many scholars and leaders who contributed their time and expertise to the committee’s information-gathering efforts. Special thanks go to all the speakers who briefed the committee:
Sivan Aldor-Noiman (Banff Advisors), Veera Baladandayuthapani (University of Michigan), Bonnie Berger (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Catherine Calder (The University of Texas at Austin), Beth Chance (California Polytechnic State University), Wei Chen (Northwestern University), Peter Chien (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Jan Dasgupta (Washington State University), Peng Ding (University of California, Berkeley), Hani Doss (University of Florida), John Duchi (Stanford University), Yulia Gel (Virginia Tech University), Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar (RAND), Carlo Graziani (Argonne National Laboratory), Trevor Hefley (Kansas State University), Dave Hunter (The Pennsylvania State University), Roshan Joseph (Georgia Institute of Technology), Amarjot Kaur (Merck), Michael Kosorok (University of North Carolina), Donna LaLonde (American Statistical Association), Nicole Alana Lazar (The Pennsylvania State University), Hongzhe Li (University of Pennsylvania), Lexin Li (University of California, Berkeley), Lester Mackey (Microsoft Research), Monnie McGee (Southern Methodist University), Shari Messinger (University of Miami), Jeffrey Morris (University of Pennsylvania), Vijay Nair (Wells Fargo), Dan Nettleton (Iowa State University), Betsy Ogburn (Johns Hopkins University), Eunchun Park (University of Arkansas), Robert Perera (Virginia Commonwealth University), Annie Qu (University of California, Irvine), Ricky Rambharat (Northrop Grumman), Abel Rodriguez (University of Washington), Christopher Saunders (South Dakota State University), David Schimel (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology), Lyndsay Shand (Sandia National Laboratories),
Dylan Small (University of Pennsylvania), Ralph Smith (North Carolina State University), Michael Stein (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Weijie Su (University of Pennsylvania), Ming Tony Tan (Georgetown University), Anh Tran (Sandia National Laboratories), Lan Wang (University of Miami), Scott Vander Wiel (Los Alamos National Laboratory), Frederi Viens (Rice University), Mark Ward (Purdue University), and Linda Young (U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service).
Additionally, numerous members of the broader statistical community participated in a call for perspectives and shared their thoughts on directions for the field. We are grateful for their time. This report was the product of the committee’s thoughtful deliberation and dedication on the topic. We extend our gratitude to the broader community for its engagement with this project.
4 STATISTICS ACROSS THE SPECTRUM
Collaboration with Allied Fields
Evolution of Synergistic Collaboration
Building a Collaboration Ecosystem
5 STATISTICAL INNOVATIONS THAT ENABLE NEW SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES
Stage 4: Deployment and Sustainment
The Risk to Science and Technology Without Statistics
6 STATISTICS EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Statistics Education: Opportunities and Significance for 2035
Frontiers of Statistics Education: What and How
Statistics for Artificial Intelligence
2-1 Statistical Development and the Life Cycle of a Statistical Innovation
4-1 The Impact of Statistics in Finance
5-1 Data-Driven Science and Genomics
5-2 Design of Experiments in Precision Agriculture
S-1 The life cycle of statistical innovation
S-2 Statistics to enable science and technology advances
2-1 The life cycle of statistical innovation
4-1 Statistics: The core of data-driven scientific progress
5-1 Statistics to enable science and technology advances
This page intentionally left blank.
| ACM | Association for Computing Machinery |
| AI | artificial intelligence |
| AISTATS | Artificial Intelligence and Statistics |
| AoAS | Annals of Applied Statistics |
| AoS | Annals of Statistics |
| AUDITION | Autism Digital Twin Foundations |
| CDC | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
| CMU | Carnegie Mellon University |
| CoFES | Center for Computational Finance and Economic Systems |
| COPSS | Committee of Presidents of Statistical Societies |
| CSAB | Computing Sciences Accreditation Board |
| DMS | Division of Mathematical Sciences |
| DOE | design of experiments |
| FAIR | findable, accessible, interoperable, and reproducible |
| GARCH | generalized autoregressive heteroskedastic |
| GFT | Google Flu Trends |
| GPU | graphical processing unit |
| ICSDS | International Conference on Statistics and Data Science |
| ILI | influenza-like illnesses |
| IMS | Institute of Mathematical Statistics |
| JASA | Journal of the American Statistical Association |
| JPL | Jet Propulsion Laboratory |
| JPSM | Joint Program in Survey Methodology |
| JSDM | joint species distribution model |
| JSM | Joint Statistical Meetings |
| LLM | large language model |
| MCMC | Markov Chain Monte Carlo |
| MD | molecular dynamics |
| MSR | Microsoft Research |
| NAIRR | National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource |
| NASA | National Aeronautics and Space Administration |
| NIH | National Institutes of Health |
| NSA | National Security Agency |
| NSF | National Science Foundation |
| PCA | principal components analysis |
| PCS | predictability, computability, and stability |
| PLoS | Public Library of Science |
| REU | research experience for undergraduate |
| SBI | simulation-based inference |
| SIAM | Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics |
| SIBS | Summer Institutes for Training in Biostatistics |
| SLM | small language model |
| TRIPODS | Transdisciplinary Research in Principles of Data Science |
| UC | University of California |
| VAE | variational autoencoder |