Completed
Health care quality is a multidimensional concept. With support from six private foundations, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened a committee to examine the available evidence on the safety and quality of different abortion methods, health facilities, and types of clinicians as well as the potential physical and mental health impacts on women. This resulting report provides a comprehensive review of the state of the science.
Featured publication
Consensus
·2018
Abortion is a legal medical procedure that has been provided to millions of American women. Since the Institute of Medicine first reviewed the health implications of national legalized abortion in 1975, there has been a plethora of related scientific research, including well-designed randomized clin...
View details
Description
In 1975, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued the report, Legalized Abortion and the Public Health: Report of a Study. The report contained a comprehensive analysis of the then available scientific evidence on the impact of abortion on the health of the public. Since 1975, there have been substantial changes in the U.S. healthcare delivery system and in medical science. In addition, practices for abortion care have changed, including the introduction of new techniques and technologies. An updated systematic and independent analysis of today’s available evidence has not been conducted. An ad hoc consensus committee of the Health and Medicine Division (HMD), which as of March 2016 continues the consensus studies and convening activities previously carried out by the IOM, will produce a comprehensive report on the current state of the science related to the provision of safe, high quality abortion services in the United States.
The committee will consider the following questions and offer findings and recommendations:
1) What types of legal abortion services are available in the United States? What is the evidence regarding which services are appropriate under different clinical circumstances (e.g., based on patient medical conditions such as previous cesarean section, obesity, gestational age)?
2) What is the evidence on the physical and mental health risks of these different abortion interventions?
3) What is the evidence on the safety and quality of medical and surgical abortion care?
4) What is the evidence on the minimum characteristics of clinical facilities necessary to effectively and safely provide the different types of abortion interventions?
5) What is the evidence on what clinical skills are necessary for health care providers to safely perform the various components of abortion care, including pregnancy determination, counseling, and gestational age assessment, medication dispensing, procedure performance, patient monitoring, and follow-up assessment and care?
6) What safeguards are necessary to manage medical emergencies arising from abortion interventions?
7) What is the evidence on the safe provision of pain management for abortion care?
8) What are the research gaps associated with the provision of safe, high quality care from pre-to post-abortion?
Collaborators
Committee
Co-Chair
Co-Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Committee Membership Roster Comments
Note: There was a change in the Committee Membership with the resignation of Michael L. Raggio effective 04/19/2017 (April 19, 2017).
Sponsors
JPB Foundation
Private: Non Profit
The David & Lucile Packard Foundation
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Staff
Rose Marie Martinez
Lead
Major units and sub-units
Health and Medicine Division
Lead
Institute of Medicine
Lead
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice
Lead
Board on Health Care Services
Lead