Completed
Topics
The Board on Higher Education and Workforce and the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine, in collaboration with the Board on Science Education and the Teacher Advisory Council, convened a workshop in Washington D.C. on February 9-10, 2017. Educators, scientists, engineers, industry leaders, and scholars from a wide range of career stages focused on identifying successful practices and metrics for mentoring students in STEMM career pathways.
Featured publication
Workshop_in_brief
·2017
Mentoring has long been understood as a beneficial component of academic and professional development. But investigations of the attributes of effective mentoring interactions in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medical (STEMM) education are only now starting to shed light on how e...
View details
Description
Under the auspices of the Board on Higher Education and Workforce (BHEW) and the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM), and in collaboration with the Board on Science Education (BOSE) and the Teacher Advisory Council (TAC), an ad hoc committee will organize a workshop that will examine the following:
What are the attributes of effective mentors and mentees in STEM education at the high school and undergraduate levels? Critical elements of a mentoring relationship include the nature of the engagement and expectations of both the mentor and mentee. Key questions to frame the workshop sessions may include the following:
To what extent can and should mentees and mentors be trained? To what extent does the training of mentees in mentorships empower them to realize the benefits of mentorship and prepare them to be future mentors themselves?
What is the role of cultural diversity in education and research mentoring relationships? What do we mean by “cultural diversity” in mentoring relationships? Are there measureable benefits of demographically-similar mentorship pairings? What happens, as is so often the case in STEM fields, when there are not enough female faculty or faculty of color to ensure those matches?
What metrics exist or can be developed to assess effective research relationships? How can we quantify “quality mentoring relationships?” By what mechanisms can we effectively measure the most successful characteristics of mentoring relationships?
Can the evidence base of what we know works in mentoring relationships drive institutional and public policies to enhance mentoring? What makes the so-called “successful” interventions sustainable?
The Academies will issue a rapporteur-authored workshop proceedings.
Collaborators
Sponsors
Private: Non Profit
Staff
Rian Lund Dahlberg
Lead
Thomas Rudin
Lead
Major units and sub-units
Policy and Global Affairs
Lead
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Collaborator
Center for Advancing Science and Technology
Lead
U.S. Science and Innovation Policy
Lead
Board on Higher Education and Workforce
Lead
Teacher Advisory Council
Collaborator
Science and Engineering Education and Workforce Program Area
Lead
Board on Science Education
Collaborator