|
Risk |
Allocation |
Remarks |
|
Design |
||
|
Technology Selection |
Contractor |
City reviews designs through an established review procedure in Service Agreement. |
|
Technology Obsolescence |
Contractor/ City |
Contractor is responsible for selecting technology that is proven, will be permitted by agencies, and will meet performance guarantees. Contractor is responsible for technology obsolescence, except for change in law, unforeseen circumstances, and unspecified conditions for raw water and water demand. |
|
Unforeseen Preexisting Site Conditions |
City |
Risks for change in law, unforeseen circumstances, and preexisting site conditions are the city’s risks. |
|
Construction/Commissioning |
||
|
Construction Period |
Contractor |
City monitors construction and tests to determine compliance with service agreement. |
|
Acceptance Test |
Contractor |
Service agreement specifies guaranteed construction period after fulfillment of conditions precedent. Notice to proceed given after conditions precedent satisfied. |
|
Payment |
City/ Contractor |
Facility not deemed suitable for commercial operation until test is passed. Retest principles outlined in service agreement. |
|
|
Construction payment based on drawdown and milestone schedule in service agreement. City is responsible for payment when milestones are met by contractor. |
|
|
Risk |
Allocation |
Remarks |
|
Operations and Maintenance |
||
|
Payment |
City |
City monitors performance via review of records and reports. City may conduct periodic inspections. |
|
Preventive Maintenance |
Contractor |
Monthly service fee paid with a fixed and variable component consistent with tax laws and forms of financing (i.e., pass-through costs, the only variable component). Monthly reports typically accompany invoices. |
|
Repairs and Replacements |
Contractor/ City |
Standard-of-care provisions and contractual obligations requiring proactive preventative maintenance program. |
|
Capital Improvements |
Contractor/ City |
Contractor is responsible for all repairs and replacements to meet performance requirements, except for certain major improvements where the city may be responsible for costs. Contractor is responsible for all capital improvements required to meet performance requirements, except for certain major improvements where the city may be responsible for costs. City is responsible for capital improvements as a result of changes to performance standards. Renegotiation principles are included in the service agreement. |
|
Supply of Raw Water |
||
|
Infrastructure (e.g., pipelines, reservoirs, etc.) |
City |
City is responsible for supplying water to facility site at interface point. Contractor assumes responsibility at the interface point. |
|
Quantity |
City/ Contractor |
Specified range of flows based on historical data is provided in the service agreement. Contractor assumes risk for flows within the specified range. City provides relief for flows outside of the range. Contractual provisions included for contractor to justify adjustments to service fees for flows outside of specified ranges. |
|
Quality |
City/ Contractor |
Specified ranges of quality based on historical data are provided in service agreement. Contractor assumes risk for quality within the specified range. City provides relief for raw water quality (additional payment or reduction in treatment rate) outside of range. |
|
Plant Performance |
||
|
Quality (without change in law) |
Contractor |
Contractor is responsible for supply of specified water quality. Contractual provisions for the need to shut down facility if raw water quality prohibits ability to meet standards. |
|
Risk |
Allocation |
Remarks |
|
Quality (with change in law) |
City |
City is responsible for costs associated with upgrading and operating facility to meet new standards. Renegotiation principles are included in service agreement. |
|
Quantity and Flow |
Contractor/ City |
Contractor is responsible for flows within specified range. Contractual provisions for delivery of water quantities requested by city outside of specified range. |
|
Infrastructure for Transmission |
City |
City is responsible for installing and maintaining transmission and distribution systems for specified and requested flows. |
|
Environmental/Permitting |
||
|
Additional Environmental Review |
Contractor |
Contractor is responsible for complying with mitigation in existing final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and to prepare supplemental EIS/addenda if needed. |
|
Existing |
Contractor |
Contractor is responsible for reporting to regulatory agencies and the city. City monitors contractor’s performance. |
|
Change in Law |
City/ Contractor |
Typically allocated to the city. Limited risk can be allocated to contractor (i.e., dollar limit). Renegotiation principles are included in service agreement. |
|
Permitting |
Contractor/ City |
Contractor secures most permits. City may be co-permittee. Securing permits typically undertaken as part of conditions precedent in service agreement. |
|
Other Factors |
||
|
Financing |
City |
City responsible for financing project as part of conditions precedent. |
|
Escalation of Costs— Construction |
Contractor/ City |
Contractor holds price until a specified calendar date. Thereafter, price escalates at a percentage of a specified index (i.e., CPI, ENR, etc.) |
|
Escalation of Costs— Operation |
City |
Service fee escalates annually at a percentage of a specified index (i.e., CPI). Certain pass-through costs are allowed. |
|
Taxation |
Contractor |
All taxes (i.e., income tax) are contractor’s responsibility. |
|
Natural Disaster |
Contractor/ City |
Insurance; renegotiation principles; force majeure provisions. City has responsible risk for amounts above uninsured portions. |
|
Industrial Relations |
||
|
Prevailing Wage Rates/Force Majeure |
Contractor |
Contractor’s choice whether or not to pay prevailing wages. Contractor’s risk if initial choice not to pay such rates is incorrect. |
|
Strikes |
Contractor/ City |
For local strikes against the facility, contractor assumes risk. For national strikes, city assumes risk. |
|
SOURCE: Westerhoff, G. P., D. Gale, P. D. Reiter, S. A. Haskins, and J. B. Gilbert. 1998. The Changing Water Utility: Creative Approaches to Effectiveness and Efficiency. Denver, Colo.: American Water Works Association. |
||