Choosing the Right Formula: Initial Report (2001)
Chapter: References and Bibliography
Page 70
References and Bibliography
NOTE: Papers prepared for the Committee on National Statistics—marked by an asterisk (*)—are available from the committee, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20418.
, and
1995
Federal block grants: What do statisticians have to contribute? In
Window on Washington,
Constance F. Citro, Ed.
Chance
8(4):
40-42.
1993
Federal Policy Options for Improving the Education of Low-Income Students.
Volume III,
Countering Inequity in School Finance.
Santa Monica, CA
:
RAND
.
1977
Statistical Data Requirements in Legislation.
Report prepared for the Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
,
, and
1993
Options for Reforming the Medicaid Matching Formula.
Washington, DC
:
The Urban Institute
.
1980
Financing Government in a Federal System.
Studies of Government Finance: Second Series.
Washington, DC
:
The Brookings Institution
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
1997
Review and Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Block Grant Allotment Formula.
RAND Drug Policy Research Center, MR-533-HHS.
Santa Monica, CA
:
RAND
.
1980
Formula Evaluation Project: Final Report.
Report to the National Science Foundation.
Rochester, NY
:
Center for Governmental Research
.
Page 71
1975
Alternative Formulas for General Revenue Sharing.
Report to the National Science Foundation.
Blacksburg, VA
:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
.
1976
A study of data requirements for population-based formula grants.
Statistical Reporter
77:
48-57.
1978 Analysis of the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) Formula, Volume I: Executive Summary. Annandale, VA : JWK International Corporation .
, and
1979
Estimates of income for small places: An empirical Bayes application of James-Stein procedures to census data.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
78:
269-277.
, and
1994
Small-area estimation: An appraisal.
Statistical Science
8(1):
55-93.
2001
New York City is shortchanged in school aid, state judge rules.
The New York Times,
January 11.
, and
1982
The census undercount: Effects on federal aid to cities.
Urban Affairs Quarterly
17(3):
251-284.
,
, and
1993
Targeting, Formula, and Resource Allocation Issues: Focusing Federal Funds Where the Needs Are Greatest.
A Supplemental Volume to the National Assessment of the Chapter I Program.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Department of Education
.
1980
The politics of printouts: The use of official numbers to allocate federal grants-in-aid.
Pp. 331-342 in
The Politics of Numbers,
W Alonso and
P. Starr, Eds.
New York
:
Russell Sage Foundation
.
1980
Estimating Population and Income of Small Areas.
Panel on Small-Area Estimates of Income and Population, Committee on National Statistics.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy Press
.
1995 Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance Concepts, C.F. Citro and R.T. Michael, Eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
1997 Small-Area Estimates of Children in Poverty, Interim Report I, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro, M.L. Cohen, G. Kalton, and K.K. West, Eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
1998 Small-Area Estimates of Children in Poverty, Interim Report 2, Evaluation of Revised 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro, M.L. Cohen, and G. Kalton, Eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
1999a Small-Area Estimates of Children in Poverty, Interim Report 3, Evaluation of Revised 1995 County and School District Estimates for Title I Allocations. Panel on Estimates
Page 72
of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, Eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
1999b Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance: Issues and Perspectives. Committee on Education Finance, H.F. Ladd, R. Chalk, and J.S. Hansen, Eds. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
2000a Small-Area Income and Poverty Estimates: Priorities for 2000 and Beyond. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, Eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
2000b Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Evaluation of Current Methodology. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, Eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
1988
Relating school district resource needs and capacities to Chapter I allocations: Implications for more effective service targeting.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
10(1):
23-36.
2000
Effect of Census 2000 Undercount on Federal Funding to States and Local Areas, 2002-2012.
Washington, DC
:
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
.
1995
State Estimates of Infants and Children Income Eligible for the WIC Program in 1992.
Washington, DC
:
Mathematica Policy Research
.
, and
*
2000
An Overview of Formulas for Allocation of Funds.
Paper prepared for the Workshop on Formulas for Allocating Program Funds, Committee on National Statistics, April 26-27, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
1980a
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Data Used to Allocate Funds.
New York
:
Springer
.
1980b Implications of equity and accuracy for undercount adjustment: A decision-theoretic approach. Pp. 204-216 in Conference on Census Undercount: Proceedings of the 1980 Conference. Washington, DC : U.S. Census Bureau .
1982a Technical issues in allocation formula design. Public Administration Review 42: 524-529.
1982b Concerning dubious estimates of the effects of census undercount adjustment of federal aid to cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly 18: 145-148.
1985 Avoiding bias in estimates of the effect of data error on allocations of public funds. Evaluation Review 9: 511-518.
1974
General Revenue Sharing Data Study.
Menlo Park, CA
:
Stanford Research Institute
.
1981
Revenue allocation by regression: National Health Service Appropriations for Teaching Hospitals.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A
144(1):
80-84.
1981
Parametric Properties of Tax Effort Revenue Sharing.
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Document SR-86.
Page 73
1983
Changing Medicaid Formula Can Improve Distribution of Funds to States.
GAO/GGD-83-27.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Government Printing Office
.
1991 Formula Programs—Adjusted Census Data Would Redistribute Small Percentage of Federal Funds to States. GAO/GGD-92-12. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office .
1991 Medicaid—Alternatives for Improving the Distribution of Funds. GAO/HRD-91-66FS. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office .
1996 Federal Grants Design Could Help Federal Resources Go Further. AIMD-97-7. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office .
1997 School Finance—State Efforts to Reduce Funding Gaps Between Poor and Wealthy Districts. GAO/HEHS-97-31. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office .
1998 School Finance—State and Federal Efforts to Target Poor Students. GAO/HEHS-98-36. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office .
1999 Formula Grants: Effects of Adjusted Population Counts on Federal Funding to States. GAO/HEHS-99-69. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office .
1998
1998 Formula Report to the Congress.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. General Services Administration
.
1978
Report on Statistics for Allocation of Funds.
Statistical Policy Working Paper 1.
Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Subcommittee on Statistics for Allocation of Funds.
Washington, DC
:
U.S. Department of Commerce
.
, and
*
2000
Interaction Between Survey Estimates and Federal Funding Formulae.
Paper presented at the Workshop on Formulas for Allocating Program Funds, Committee on National Statistics, April 26-27, National Research Council. Washington, DC.
