Water Resources Planning for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway (2005)
Chapter: References
References
Denver Post. 2005. Water decision disappointing. Denver Post Editorial, May 12, 2005.
Freeman, A.M., III. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values; Theory and Methods. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
Holling, C.S. (ed.). 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Jacobs, J. 2002. Broadening U.S. Water Resources Project Planning and Evaluation. Natural Resources Journal 42(1):21-31.
Kelley, R. 1998. Battling the Inland Sea: Floods, Public Policy, and the Sacramento Valley. Berkeley, Calf.: University of California Press.
Lee, K. 1999. Appraising Adaptive Management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):3. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3. Accessed June 6, 2005.
NRC (National Research Council). 2001. Inland Navigation System Planning: The Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2002. Review Procedures for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2004a. Review of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Restructured Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway Feasibility Study. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2004b. Review of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Restructured Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway Feasibility Study: Second Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2004c. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2004d. Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2004e. River Basins and Coastal Systems Planning within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2004f. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NWF (National Wildlife Federation) and Taxpayers for Common Sense. 2004. Crossroads: Congress, the Corps of Engineers, and the Future of America’s Water Resources. Washington, D.C.: National Wildlife Federation.
Stakhiv, R., R. Cole, P. Scodari, and L. Martin. 2003. Improving Environmental Benefits Analysis in Ecosystem Restoration Planning. IWR Report 03-PS-3. Alexandria, Va.: Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Twain, M. 1883. Life on the Mississippi. Boston: James R. Osgood and Company.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2000. Planning Guidance Notebook. ER 1105-2-100, April 22, 2000. Available online at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-regs/er1105-1-100/tochtm. Accessed June 6, 2005.
USACE, 2005. Peer Review of Decision Documents. EC 1105-2-408. Available online at http://www.usace.army.mil/publications/eng-circulars/ec1105-2-408/toc.htm. Accessed August 4, 2005.
WRC (U.S. Water Resources Council). 1973. Water and Related Land Resources: Establishment of Principles and Standards. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
WRC (U.S. Water Resources Council). 1983. Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Implementation Studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
White, G.F. 1971. Unpublished paper, delivered at Columbia University, March 21.
