A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD) (2011)

Chapter: 4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings

Unfortunately, this book can't be printed from the OpenBook. If you need to print pages from this book, we recommend downloading it as a PDF.

Visit NAP.edu/10766 to get more information about this book, to buy it in print, or to download it as a free PDF.
Previous Chapter: 3 Study Design
Page 49 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 49
Page 50 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 50
Page 51 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 51
Page 52 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 52
Page 53 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 53
Page 54 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 54
Page 55 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 55
Page 56 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 56
Page 57 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 57
Page 58 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 58
Page 59 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 59
Page 60 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 60
Page 61 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 61
Page 62 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 62
Page 63 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 63
Page 64 Cite Bookmark
Suggested Citation: "4 The Methodologies Used to Derive Two Illustrative Rankings." National Research Council. 2011. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12994.
Save
Cancel
Page 64
Next Chapter: 5 Faculty Values as Reflected in the Two Illustrative Rankings
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.