Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities (2015)

Chapter: Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data

Previous Chapter: References
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

Appendix A

Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data

This appendix presents an expanded version of Table 2-2 (in Chapter 2), providing a detailed overview of the precision and usability of five key American Community Survey variables: (1) persons living in poverty, (2) occupied housing units that are renter occupied, (3) households receiving benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in the past 12 months, (4) persons who are foreign born, and (5) the population aged 25 and older with a graduate or professional degree.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

TABLE A-1 Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data (in percentage)

CharacteristicsPercentage of Persons Living in PovertyaPercentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter OccupiedbPercentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 MonthscPercentage of Persons Who Are Foreign BornPercentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
National Estimate14.934.511.412.910.6
National Margin of Error±0.1±0.2±0.1±0.1±0.1
All Tractse

Tract range

0-1000-1000-1000-1000-100

Tract mean

16.035.212.512.210.3

Tract median

12.629.89.26.97.2

Tract median CV

28.314.729.529.726.0

Tract median MoE

5.86.74.63.43.2

CV ≤ 30%

5688515061

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

359292927

CV > 50%

92202112

Confidence interval ≥ 10 percentage points

5980453017

MoE > estimate

4116158

Confidence interval lower bound < 0

4116158

Confidence interval upper bound > 100

0.17 (125 tracts)1.4 (1034 tracts)0.1 (89 tracts)0.05 (37 tracts)0.1 (64 tracts)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0Percentage of Persons Living in PovertyfPercentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter OccupiedgPercentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 MonthshPercentage of Persons Who Are Foreign BorniPercentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreej
Tract range0.02-96.30.14-99.80.04-94.20.02-95.00.02-97.4

Tract mean

16.034.912.912.510.4

Tract median

12.629.79.77.27.3

Tract median CV

28.414.830.330.426.2

Tract median MoE

5.86.74.83.53.2

CV ≤ 30%

5588494960

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

359303027

CV > 50%

92202113

Confidence interval ≥ 10 percentage points

5980463117

MoE > estimate

4113137

Confidence interval lower bound < 0

4113137

Confidence interval upper bound > 100

0.11 (78 tracts)0.8 (541 tracts)0.01 (10 tracts)0.02 (11 tracts).03 (19 tracts)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
CharacteristicsPercentage of Persons Living in PovertyaPercentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter OccupiedbPercentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 MonthscPercentage of Persons Who Are Foreign BornPercentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
Confidence Interval Width ≥ 10 Percentage Points by CV Category, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0          

CV ≤ 30%

7384694824

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

465833199

CV > 50%

30321186
Median CVs by Tract Total Population Size 

All Tracts

< 1,00031.318.727.243.637.6
1,000-2,99929.016.029.638.631.4
3,000-4,99928.114.329.329.625.9
5,000-6,99928.214.129.825.223.5
7,000+27.814.429.520.720.8

Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

  < 1,000

37.224.640.754.749.4
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

1,000-2,999

29.116.230.640.231.9

3,000-4,999

28.114.430.030.126.0

5,000-6,999

28.214.130.425.323.6

7,000+

27.814.429.920.820.8
Median CV by Tract Number of Housing Units

All Tracts

≤ 400

32.612.023.729.842.9

401-1,000

31.618.031.834.135.5

1,001-2,000

28.414.929.230.927.4

2,001-4,000

27.413.629.128.122.7

4,001-6,000

27.213.431.820.817.0

6,001+

26.413.740.416.014.2

Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

48.628.963.135.658.5

401-1,000

31.718.333.236.236.5

1,001-2,000

28.415.029.931.527.5

2,001-4,000

27.413.629.628.322.7

4,001-6,000

27.213.432.420.817.0

6,001+

26.413.740.716.014.2
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
CharacteristicsPercentage of Persons Living in PovertyaPercentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter OccupiedbPercentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 MonthscPercentage of Persons Who Are Foreign BornPercentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
Confidence Interval ≥ 10 Percentage Points by Tract Population Size, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

< 1,000

8393795861

1,000-2,999

6886603428

3,000-4,999

5980463216

5,000-6,999

5477382811

7,000+

466729236
Confidence Interval ≥ 10 Percentage Points by Tract Number of Housing Units, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

8895854556

401-1,000

7288664330

1,001-2,000

6181493217

2,001-4,000

5377362513
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

4,001-6,000

3863161714

6,001+

2554101516
MoE > Estimate by Tract Population Size, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

< 1,000

2514344339

1,000-2,999

62142213

3,000-4,999

4112116

5,000-6,999

30.51273

7,000+

20.41032
MoE > Estimate by Tract Number of Housing Units, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

3620522247

401-1,000

93172219

1,001-2,000

4113147

2,001-4,000

20.31182

4,001-6,000

101210.2
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
CharacteristicsPercentage of Persons Living in PovertyaPercentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter OccupiedbPercentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 MonthscPercentage of Persons Who Are Foreign BornPercentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
6,001+101320

 

aTracts with no persons in the universe for which poverty rates are calculated were excluded from this analysis.

bTracts with no households were excluded from this analysis.

cSNAP is Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; tracts with no households were excluded from this analysis.

dTracts with no persons aged 25 and older were excluded from this analysis.

eTracts with zero population are excluded.

fThere are 265 tracts excluded because the estimated poverty rate equals zero. When the poverty rate is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

gThere are 596 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of renter-occupied households equals zero or the percentage of renter-occupied households equals zero. When the percentage renter occupied is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

hThere are 2,754 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage with SNAP benefits equals zero or the percentage with SNAP benefits equals zero. When the percentage with SNAP benefits is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

iThere are 1,806 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of the foreign-born population equals zero or the percentage of the foreign–born population equals zero. When the percentage population is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

jThere are 940 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of persons with a professional degree equals zero or the percentage of persons with a professional degree equals zero. When the percentage with a professional degree is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

NOTE: MoE is margin of error; CV is coefficient of variation.

SOURCE: Panel analysis of data from the 2008-2012 ACS Summary File, available at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/summary_file/ [September 2014].

Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 121
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 122
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 123
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 124
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 125
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 126
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 127
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 128
Next Chapter: Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates
Subscribe to Emails from the National Academies
Stay up to date on activities, publications, and events by subscribing to email updates.