Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities (2015)

Chapter: Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data

Previous Chapter: References
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

Appendix A

Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data

This appendix presents an expanded version of Table 2-2 (in Chapter 2), providing a detailed overview of the precision and usability of five key American Community Survey variables: (1) persons living in poverty, (2) occupied housing units that are renter occupied, (3) households receiving benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in the past 12 months, (4) persons who are foreign born, and (5) the population aged 25 and older with a graduate or professional degree.

Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

TABLE A-1 Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data (in percentage)

Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
National Estimate 14.9 34.5 11.4 12.9 10.6
National Margin of Error ±0.1 ±0.2 ±0.1 ±0.1 ±0.1
All Tractse

Tract range

0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100

Tract mean

16.0 35.2 12.5 12.2 10.3

Tract median

12.6 29.8 9.2 6.9 7.2

Tract median CV

28.3 14.7 29.5 29.7 26.0

Tract median MoE

5.8 6.7 4.6 3.4 3.2

CV ≤ 30%

56 88 51 50 61

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

35 9 29 29 27

CV > 50%

9 2 20 21 12

Confidence interval ≥ 10 percentage points

59 80 45 30 17

MoE > estimate

4 1 16 15 8

Confidence interval lower bound < 0

4 1 16 15 8

Confidence interval upper bound > 100

0.17 (125 tracts) 1.4 (1034 tracts) 0.1 (89 tracts) 0.05 (37 tracts) 0.1 (64 tracts)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0 Percentage of Persons Living in Povertyf Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedg Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsh Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Borni Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreej
Tract range 0.02-96.3 0.14-99.8 0.04-94.2 0.02-95.0 0.02-97.4

Tract mean

16.0 34.9 12.9 12.5 10.4

Tract median

12.6 29.7 9.7 7.2 7.3

Tract median CV

28.4 14.8 30.3 30.4 26.2

Tract median MoE

5.8 6.7 4.8 3.5 3.2

CV ≤ 30%

55 88 49 49 60

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

35 9 30 30 27

CV > 50%

9 2 20 21 13

Confidence interval ≥ 10 percentage points

59 80 46 31 17

MoE > estimate

4 1 13 13 7

Confidence interval lower bound < 0

4 1 13 13 7

Confidence interval upper bound > 100

0.11 (78 tracts) 0.8 (541 tracts) 0.01 (10 tracts) 0.02 (11 tracts) .03 (19 tracts)
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
Confidence Interval Width ≥ 10 Percentage Points by CV Category, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0                    

CV ≤ 30%

73 84 69 48 24

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

46 58 33 19 9

CV > 50%

30 32 11 8 6
Median CVs by Tract Total Population Size  

All Tracts

< 1,000 31.3 18.7 27.2 43.6 37.6
1,000-2,999 29.0 16.0 29.6 38.6 31.4
3,000-4,999 28.1 14.3 29.3 29.6 25.9
5,000-6,999 28.2 14.1 29.8 25.2 23.5
7,000+ 27.8 14.4 29.5 20.7 20.8

Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

  < 1,000

37.2 24.6 40.7 54.7 49.4
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

1,000-2,999

29.1 16.2 30.6 40.2 31.9

3,000-4,999

28.1 14.4 30.0 30.1 26.0

5,000-6,999

28.2 14.1 30.4 25.3 23.6

7,000+

27.8 14.4 29.9 20.8 20.8
Median CV by Tract Number of Housing Units

All Tracts

≤ 400

32.6 12.0 23.7 29.8 42.9

401-1,000

31.6 18.0 31.8 34.1 35.5

1,001-2,000

28.4 14.9 29.2 30.9 27.4

2,001-4,000

27.4 13.6 29.1 28.1 22.7

4,001-6,000

27.2 13.4 31.8 20.8 17.0

6,001+

26.4 13.7 40.4 16.0 14.2

Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

48.6 28.9 63.1 35.6 58.5

401-1,000

31.7 18.3 33.2 36.2 36.5

1,001-2,000

28.4 15.0 29.9 31.5 27.5

2,001-4,000

27.4 13.6 29.6 28.3 22.7

4,001-6,000

27.2 13.4 32.4 20.8 17.0

6,001+

26.4 13.7 40.7 16.0 14.2
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
Confidence Interval ≥ 10 Percentage Points by Tract Population Size, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

< 1,000

83 93 79 58 61

1,000-2,999

68 86 60 34 28

3,000-4,999

59 80 46 32 16

5,000-6,999

54 77 38 28 11

7,000+

46 67 29 23 6
Confidence Interval ≥ 10 Percentage Points by Tract Number of Housing Units, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

88 95 85 45 56

401-1,000

72 88 66 43 30

1,001-2,000

61 81 49 32 17

2,001-4,000

53 77 36 25 13
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.

4,001-6,000

38 63 16 17 14

6,001+

25 54 10 15 16
MoE > Estimate by Tract Population Size, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

< 1,000

25 14 34 43 39

1,000-2,999

6 2 14 22 13

3,000-4,999

4 1 12 11 6

5,000-6,999

3 0.5 12 7 3

7,000+

2 0.4 10 3 2
MoE > Estimate by Tract Number of Housing Units, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

36 20 52 22 47

401-1,000

9 3 17 22 19

1,001-2,000

4 1 13 14 7

2,001-4,000

2 0.3 11 8 2

4,001-6,000

1 0 12 1 0.2
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
6,001+ 1 0 13 2 0

 

aTracts with no persons in the universe for which poverty rates are calculated were excluded from this analysis.

bTracts with no households were excluded from this analysis.

cSNAP is Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; tracts with no households were excluded from this analysis.

dTracts with no persons aged 25 and older were excluded from this analysis.

eTracts with zero population are excluded.

fThere are 265 tracts excluded because the estimated poverty rate equals zero. When the poverty rate is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

gThere are 596 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of renter-occupied households equals zero or the percentage of renter-occupied households equals zero. When the percentage renter occupied is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

hThere are 2,754 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage with SNAP benefits equals zero or the percentage with SNAP benefits equals zero. When the percentage with SNAP benefits is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

iThere are 1,806 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of the foreign-born population equals zero or the percentage of the foreign–born population equals zero. When the percentage population is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

jThere are 940 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of persons with a professional degree equals zero or the percentage of persons with a professional degree equals zero. When the percentage with a professional degree is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

NOTE: MoE is margin of error; CV is coefficient of variation.

SOURCE: Panel analysis of data from the 2008-2012 ACS Summary File, available at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/summary_file/ [September 2014].

Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 121
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 122
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 123
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 124
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 125
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 126
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 127
Suggested Citation: "Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
Page 128
Next Chapter: Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.